Cargando…

Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review

Chronic wounds are defined as “hard‐to‐heal” wounds that are caused by disordered mechanisms of wound healing. Chronic wounds have a high risk of infection and can form biofilms, leading to the release of planktonic bacteria, which causes persistent infections locally or remotely. Therefore, infecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kataoka, Yukie, Kunimitsu, Mao, Nakagami, Gojiro, Koudounas, Sofoklis, Weller, Carolina D., Sanada, Hiromi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33236843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13509
_version_ 1783715844161798144
author Kataoka, Yukie
Kunimitsu, Mao
Nakagami, Gojiro
Koudounas, Sofoklis
Weller, Carolina D.
Sanada, Hiromi
author_facet Kataoka, Yukie
Kunimitsu, Mao
Nakagami, Gojiro
Koudounas, Sofoklis
Weller, Carolina D.
Sanada, Hiromi
author_sort Kataoka, Yukie
collection PubMed
description Chronic wounds are defined as “hard‐to‐heal” wounds that are caused by disordered mechanisms of wound healing. Chronic wounds have a high risk of infection and can form biofilms, leading to the release of planktonic bacteria, which causes persistent infections locally or remotely. Therefore, infection control and removal of the biofilm in chronic wounds are essential. Recently, ultrasonic debridement was introduced as a new method to reduce infection and promote the healing of chronic wounds. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on the changes in bacteria and biofilms, and consequently the wound healing rate of chronic wounds. A total of 1021 articles were identified through the database search, and nine papers were eligible for inclusion. Findings suggest that non‐contact devices are useful for wound healing as they reduce the inflammatory response, although the bacterial load is not significantly changed. Ultrasonic debridement devices that require direct contact with the wound promote wound healing through reduction of biofilm or bacterial load. The optimum settings for ultrasonic debridement using a non‐contact device are relatively consistent, but the settings for devices that require direct contact are diverse. Further studies on ultrasonic debridement in chronic wounds are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82440032021-07-02 Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review Kataoka, Yukie Kunimitsu, Mao Nakagami, Gojiro Koudounas, Sofoklis Weller, Carolina D. Sanada, Hiromi Int Wound J Original Articles Chronic wounds are defined as “hard‐to‐heal” wounds that are caused by disordered mechanisms of wound healing. Chronic wounds have a high risk of infection and can form biofilms, leading to the release of planktonic bacteria, which causes persistent infections locally or remotely. Therefore, infection control and removal of the biofilm in chronic wounds are essential. Recently, ultrasonic debridement was introduced as a new method to reduce infection and promote the healing of chronic wounds. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on the changes in bacteria and biofilms, and consequently the wound healing rate of chronic wounds. A total of 1021 articles were identified through the database search, and nine papers were eligible for inclusion. Findings suggest that non‐contact devices are useful for wound healing as they reduce the inflammatory response, although the bacterial load is not significantly changed. Ultrasonic debridement devices that require direct contact with the wound promote wound healing through reduction of biofilm or bacterial load. The optimum settings for ultrasonic debridement using a non‐contact device are relatively consistent, but the settings for devices that require direct contact are diverse. Further studies on ultrasonic debridement in chronic wounds are required. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8244003/ /pubmed/33236843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13509 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kataoka, Yukie
Kunimitsu, Mao
Nakagami, Gojiro
Koudounas, Sofoklis
Weller, Carolina D.
Sanada, Hiromi
Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review
title Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review
title_full Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review
title_short Effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: A scoping review
title_sort effectiveness of ultrasonic debridement on reduction of bacteria and biofilm in patients with chronic wounds: a scoping review
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33236843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13509
work_keys_str_mv AT kataokayukie effectivenessofultrasonicdebridementonreductionofbacteriaandbiofilminpatientswithchronicwoundsascopingreview
AT kunimitsumao effectivenessofultrasonicdebridementonreductionofbacteriaandbiofilminpatientswithchronicwoundsascopingreview
AT nakagamigojiro effectivenessofultrasonicdebridementonreductionofbacteriaandbiofilminpatientswithchronicwoundsascopingreview
AT koudounassofoklis effectivenessofultrasonicdebridementonreductionofbacteriaandbiofilminpatientswithchronicwoundsascopingreview
AT wellercarolinad effectivenessofultrasonicdebridementonreductionofbacteriaandbiofilminpatientswithchronicwoundsascopingreview
AT sanadahiromi effectivenessofultrasonicdebridementonreductionofbacteriaandbiofilminpatientswithchronicwoundsascopingreview