Cargando…

Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary

The physical processes during planet formation span a large range of pressures and temperatures. Giant impacts, such as the one that formed the Moon, achieve peak pressures of 100s of GPa. The peak shock states generate sufficient entropy such that subsequent decompression to low pressures intersect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, E. J., Duncan, M. S., Root, S., Kraus, R. G., Spaulding, D. K., Jacobsen, S. B., Stewart, S. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006745
_version_ 1783715866806845440
author Davies, E. J.
Duncan, M. S.
Root, S.
Kraus, R. G.
Spaulding, D. K.
Jacobsen, S. B.
Stewart, S. T.
author_facet Davies, E. J.
Duncan, M. S.
Root, S.
Kraus, R. G.
Spaulding, D. K.
Jacobsen, S. B.
Stewart, S. T.
author_sort Davies, E. J.
collection PubMed
description The physical processes during planet formation span a large range of pressures and temperatures. Giant impacts, such as the one that formed the Moon, achieve peak pressures of 100s of GPa. The peak shock states generate sufficient entropy such that subsequent decompression to low pressures intersects the liquid‐vapor phase boundary. The entire shock‐and‐release thermodynamic path must be calculated accurately in order to predict the post‐impact structures of planetary bodies. Forsterite (Mg(2)SiO(4)) is a commonly used mineral to represent the mantles of differentiated bodies in hydrocode models of planetary collisions. Here, we performed shock experiments on the Sandia Z Machine to obtain the density and temperature of the liquid branch of the liquid‐vapor phase boundary of forsterite. This work is combined with previous work constraining pressure, density, temperature, and entropy of the forsterite principal Hugoniot. We find that the vapor curves in previous forsterite equation of state models used in giant impacts vary substantially from our experimental results, and we compare our results to a recently updated equation of state. We have also found that due to under‐predicted entropy production on the principal Hugoniot and elevated temperatures of the liquid vapor phase boundary of these past models, past impact studies may have underestimated vapor production. Furthermore, our results provide experimental support to the idea that giant impacts can transform much of the mantles of rocky planets into supercritical fluids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82441052021-07-02 Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary Davies, E. J. Duncan, M. S. Root, S. Kraus, R. G. Spaulding, D. K. Jacobsen, S. B. Stewart, S. T. J Geophys Res Planets Research Article The physical processes during planet formation span a large range of pressures and temperatures. Giant impacts, such as the one that formed the Moon, achieve peak pressures of 100s of GPa. The peak shock states generate sufficient entropy such that subsequent decompression to low pressures intersects the liquid‐vapor phase boundary. The entire shock‐and‐release thermodynamic path must be calculated accurately in order to predict the post‐impact structures of planetary bodies. Forsterite (Mg(2)SiO(4)) is a commonly used mineral to represent the mantles of differentiated bodies in hydrocode models of planetary collisions. Here, we performed shock experiments on the Sandia Z Machine to obtain the density and temperature of the liquid branch of the liquid‐vapor phase boundary of forsterite. This work is combined with previous work constraining pressure, density, temperature, and entropy of the forsterite principal Hugoniot. We find that the vapor curves in previous forsterite equation of state models used in giant impacts vary substantially from our experimental results, and we compare our results to a recently updated equation of state. We have also found that due to under‐predicted entropy production on the principal Hugoniot and elevated temperatures of the liquid vapor phase boundary of these past models, past impact studies may have underestimated vapor production. Furthermore, our results provide experimental support to the idea that giant impacts can transform much of the mantles of rocky planets into supercritical fluids. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-22 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8244105/ /pubmed/34221785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006745 Text en © 2021. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory/Security, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies, E. J.
Duncan, M. S.
Root, S.
Kraus, R. G.
Spaulding, D. K.
Jacobsen, S. B.
Stewart, S. T.
Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
title Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
title_full Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
title_fullStr Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
title_full_unstemmed Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
title_short Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
title_sort temperature and density on the forsterite liquid‐vapor phase boundary
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006745
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesej temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary
AT duncanms temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary
AT roots temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary
AT krausrg temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary
AT spauldingdk temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary
AT jacobsensb temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary
AT stewartst temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary