Cargando…
Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary
The physical processes during planet formation span a large range of pressures and temperatures. Giant impacts, such as the one that formed the Moon, achieve peak pressures of 100s of GPa. The peak shock states generate sufficient entropy such that subsequent decompression to low pressures intersect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006745 |
_version_ | 1783715866806845440 |
---|---|
author | Davies, E. J. Duncan, M. S. Root, S. Kraus, R. G. Spaulding, D. K. Jacobsen, S. B. Stewart, S. T. |
author_facet | Davies, E. J. Duncan, M. S. Root, S. Kraus, R. G. Spaulding, D. K. Jacobsen, S. B. Stewart, S. T. |
author_sort | Davies, E. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The physical processes during planet formation span a large range of pressures and temperatures. Giant impacts, such as the one that formed the Moon, achieve peak pressures of 100s of GPa. The peak shock states generate sufficient entropy such that subsequent decompression to low pressures intersects the liquid‐vapor phase boundary. The entire shock‐and‐release thermodynamic path must be calculated accurately in order to predict the post‐impact structures of planetary bodies. Forsterite (Mg(2)SiO(4)) is a commonly used mineral to represent the mantles of differentiated bodies in hydrocode models of planetary collisions. Here, we performed shock experiments on the Sandia Z Machine to obtain the density and temperature of the liquid branch of the liquid‐vapor phase boundary of forsterite. This work is combined with previous work constraining pressure, density, temperature, and entropy of the forsterite principal Hugoniot. We find that the vapor curves in previous forsterite equation of state models used in giant impacts vary substantially from our experimental results, and we compare our results to a recently updated equation of state. We have also found that due to under‐predicted entropy production on the principal Hugoniot and elevated temperatures of the liquid vapor phase boundary of these past models, past impact studies may have underestimated vapor production. Furthermore, our results provide experimental support to the idea that giant impacts can transform much of the mantles of rocky planets into supercritical fluids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8244105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82441052021-07-02 Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary Davies, E. J. Duncan, M. S. Root, S. Kraus, R. G. Spaulding, D. K. Jacobsen, S. B. Stewart, S. T. J Geophys Res Planets Research Article The physical processes during planet formation span a large range of pressures and temperatures. Giant impacts, such as the one that formed the Moon, achieve peak pressures of 100s of GPa. The peak shock states generate sufficient entropy such that subsequent decompression to low pressures intersects the liquid‐vapor phase boundary. The entire shock‐and‐release thermodynamic path must be calculated accurately in order to predict the post‐impact structures of planetary bodies. Forsterite (Mg(2)SiO(4)) is a commonly used mineral to represent the mantles of differentiated bodies in hydrocode models of planetary collisions. Here, we performed shock experiments on the Sandia Z Machine to obtain the density and temperature of the liquid branch of the liquid‐vapor phase boundary of forsterite. This work is combined with previous work constraining pressure, density, temperature, and entropy of the forsterite principal Hugoniot. We find that the vapor curves in previous forsterite equation of state models used in giant impacts vary substantially from our experimental results, and we compare our results to a recently updated equation of state. We have also found that due to under‐predicted entropy production on the principal Hugoniot and elevated temperatures of the liquid vapor phase boundary of these past models, past impact studies may have underestimated vapor production. Furthermore, our results provide experimental support to the idea that giant impacts can transform much of the mantles of rocky planets into supercritical fluids. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-22 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8244105/ /pubmed/34221785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006745 Text en © 2021. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory/Security, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Davies, E. J. Duncan, M. S. Root, S. Kraus, R. G. Spaulding, D. K. Jacobsen, S. B. Stewart, S. T. Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary |
title | Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary |
title_full | Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary |
title_fullStr | Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary |
title_full_unstemmed | Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary |
title_short | Temperature and Density on the Forsterite Liquid‐Vapor Phase Boundary |
title_sort | temperature and density on the forsterite liquid‐vapor phase boundary |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviesej temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary AT duncanms temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary AT roots temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary AT krausrg temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary AT spauldingdk temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary AT jacobsensb temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary AT stewartst temperatureanddensityontheforsteriteliquidvaporphaseboundary |