Cargando…

No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T

Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging facilitates high spatiotemporal resolution that benefits from increasing the number of receiver elements. Because high‐density receiver arrays have a relatively small element size compared with the transmitter, a side effect is that such setups cause low fl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gosselink, Mark, Hoogduin, Hans, Froeling, Martijn, Klomp, Dennis W. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4491
_version_ 1783715869413605376
author Gosselink, Mark
Hoogduin, Hans
Froeling, Martijn
Klomp, Dennis W. J.
author_facet Gosselink, Mark
Hoogduin, Hans
Froeling, Martijn
Klomp, Dennis W. J.
author_sort Gosselink, Mark
collection PubMed
description Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging facilitates high spatiotemporal resolution that benefits from increasing the number of receiver elements. Because high‐density receiver arrays have a relatively small element size compared with the transmitter, a side effect is that such setups cause low flux coupling between the transmitter and receiver. Moreover, when transmitters are designed in a multitransmit configuration, their relative size is much smaller than the sample, reducing coupling to the sample and thereby potentially also the coupling to the receivers. Transmitters are traditionally detuned during reception. In this study, we investigate, for a 32‐channel receiver head array at 7 T, if transmitter detuning of a quadrature birdcage or of an eight‐channel transmit coil can be omitted without substantially sacrificing signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). The transmit elements are operated once with and once without detuning and, in the latter, the received signals are either merged with the array or excluded for image reconstruction. For each of the three measurements, SNR and 1/g‐factor maps are investigated. The tuning of the quadrature and eight‐channel transmit coils during signal reception introduced a 10.1% and 6.5% penalty in SNR, respectively, relative to the SNR received with detuned transmitters. When also incorporating the signal of the transmit coils, the SNR was regained to 98.5% or 101.4% for the quadrature and eight‐channel coil, respectively, relative to the detuned transmitters, while the 1/g‐factor maps improved slightly. For the 32‐channel receive coil used the SNR penalty can become negligible when omitting detuning of the transmit coils. This not only simplifies transmit coil designs, potentially increasing their efficiency, but also enables the transmitters to be used as receivers in parallel to the receiver array, thus increasing parallel imaging performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82441172021-07-02 No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T Gosselink, Mark Hoogduin, Hans Froeling, Martijn Klomp, Dennis W. J. NMR Biomed Research Articles Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging facilitates high spatiotemporal resolution that benefits from increasing the number of receiver elements. Because high‐density receiver arrays have a relatively small element size compared with the transmitter, a side effect is that such setups cause low flux coupling between the transmitter and receiver. Moreover, when transmitters are designed in a multitransmit configuration, their relative size is much smaller than the sample, reducing coupling to the sample and thereby potentially also the coupling to the receivers. Transmitters are traditionally detuned during reception. In this study, we investigate, for a 32‐channel receiver head array at 7 T, if transmitter detuning of a quadrature birdcage or of an eight‐channel transmit coil can be omitted without substantially sacrificing signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). The transmit elements are operated once with and once without detuning and, in the latter, the received signals are either merged with the array or excluded for image reconstruction. For each of the three measurements, SNR and 1/g‐factor maps are investigated. The tuning of the quadrature and eight‐channel transmit coils during signal reception introduced a 10.1% and 6.5% penalty in SNR, respectively, relative to the SNR received with detuned transmitters. When also incorporating the signal of the transmit coils, the SNR was regained to 98.5% or 101.4% for the quadrature and eight‐channel coil, respectively, relative to the detuned transmitters, while the 1/g‐factor maps improved slightly. For the 32‐channel receive coil used the SNR penalty can become negligible when omitting detuning of the transmit coils. This not only simplifies transmit coil designs, potentially increasing their efficiency, but also enables the transmitters to be used as receivers in parallel to the receiver array, thus increasing parallel imaging performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-10 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8244117/ /pubmed/33567471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4491 Text en © 2021 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gosselink, Mark
Hoogduin, Hans
Froeling, Martijn
Klomp, Dennis W. J.
No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T
title No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T
title_full No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T
title_fullStr No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T
title_full_unstemmed No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T
title_short No need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 T
title_sort no need to detune transmitters in 32‐channel receiver arrays at 7 t
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4491
work_keys_str_mv AT gosselinkmark noneedtodetunetransmittersin32channelreceiverarraysat7t
AT hoogduinhans noneedtodetunetransmittersin32channelreceiverarraysat7t
AT froelingmartijn noneedtodetunetransmittersin32channelreceiverarraysat7t
AT klompdenniswj noneedtodetunetransmittersin32channelreceiverarraysat7t