Cargando…

Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization after surgery is a key recommendation for people with hip fracture, however this is achieved by only 50% of people. Recumbent bike riding has been used in other populations with limited mobility and has potential to allow early exercise in people post hip fracture. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Said, Catherine M., Delahunt, Marisa, Hardidge, Andrew, Smith, Paul, Tran, Phong, McDonald, Luke, Kefalianos, Emmanuel, Daniel, Cathy, Berney, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02321-8
_version_ 1783715875446063104
author Said, Catherine M.
Delahunt, Marisa
Hardidge, Andrew
Smith, Paul
Tran, Phong
McDonald, Luke
Kefalianos, Emmanuel
Daniel, Cathy
Berney, Sue
author_facet Said, Catherine M.
Delahunt, Marisa
Hardidge, Andrew
Smith, Paul
Tran, Phong
McDonald, Luke
Kefalianos, Emmanuel
Daniel, Cathy
Berney, Sue
author_sort Said, Catherine M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early mobilization after surgery is a key recommendation for people with hip fracture, however this is achieved by only 50% of people. Recumbent bike riding has been used in other populations with limited mobility and has potential to allow early exercise in people post hip fracture. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a trial protocol designed to determine the effect of early post-operative cycling in bed on outcomes in people with hip fracture. METHODS: Single-blinded, multi-site randomized controlled pilot trial. Fifty-one people with hip fracture were recruited within 4 days of surgery from two sites in Victoria. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either usual care (n = 25) or usual care plus active cycling in bed (n = 26). The cycling intervention was delivered on weekdays until the participant could walk 15 m with assistance of one person. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety. Clinical outcomes, including mobility (Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale) and delirium were measured at day seven post-operatively and at hospital discharge by an assessor blinded to group. Additional outcomes at discharge included gait speed, cognition and quality of life. RESULTS: The intervention was safe, feasible and acceptable to patients and staff. Delivery of the intervention was ceased on (median) day 9.5 (IQR 7, 12); 73% of scheduled sessions were delivered; (median) 4 sessions (IQR 2.0, 5.5) were delivered per participant with (median) 9 min 34 s (IQR 04:39, 17:34) of active cycling per session. The trial protocol was feasible, however at day seven 75% of participants had not met the criterion (able to walk 15 m with assistance of one person) to cease the cycling intervention.. CONCLUSION: In bed cycling is feasible post-operatively following hip fracture, however seven days post-operatively is too early to evaluate the impact of the cycling intervention as many participants were still receiving the intervention. A fully powered RCT to explore the effectiveness and cost efficiency of this novel intervention is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered (25/09/2017) with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617001345370.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82441482021-06-30 Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial Said, Catherine M. Delahunt, Marisa Hardidge, Andrew Smith, Paul Tran, Phong McDonald, Luke Kefalianos, Emmanuel Daniel, Cathy Berney, Sue BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Early mobilization after surgery is a key recommendation for people with hip fracture, however this is achieved by only 50% of people. Recumbent bike riding has been used in other populations with limited mobility and has potential to allow early exercise in people post hip fracture. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a trial protocol designed to determine the effect of early post-operative cycling in bed on outcomes in people with hip fracture. METHODS: Single-blinded, multi-site randomized controlled pilot trial. Fifty-one people with hip fracture were recruited within 4 days of surgery from two sites in Victoria. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either usual care (n = 25) or usual care plus active cycling in bed (n = 26). The cycling intervention was delivered on weekdays until the participant could walk 15 m with assistance of one person. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety. Clinical outcomes, including mobility (Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale) and delirium were measured at day seven post-operatively and at hospital discharge by an assessor blinded to group. Additional outcomes at discharge included gait speed, cognition and quality of life. RESULTS: The intervention was safe, feasible and acceptable to patients and staff. Delivery of the intervention was ceased on (median) day 9.5 (IQR 7, 12); 73% of scheduled sessions were delivered; (median) 4 sessions (IQR 2.0, 5.5) were delivered per participant with (median) 9 min 34 s (IQR 04:39, 17:34) of active cycling per session. The trial protocol was feasible, however at day seven 75% of participants had not met the criterion (able to walk 15 m with assistance of one person) to cease the cycling intervention.. CONCLUSION: In bed cycling is feasible post-operatively following hip fracture, however seven days post-operatively is too early to evaluate the impact of the cycling intervention as many participants were still receiving the intervention. A fully powered RCT to explore the effectiveness and cost efficiency of this novel intervention is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered (25/09/2017) with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617001345370. BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8244148/ /pubmed/34187387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02321-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Said, Catherine M.
Delahunt, Marisa
Hardidge, Andrew
Smith, Paul
Tran, Phong
McDonald, Luke
Kefalianos, Emmanuel
Daniel, Cathy
Berney, Sue
Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
title Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
title_full Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
title_fullStr Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
title_short Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
title_sort recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02321-8
work_keys_str_mv AT saidcatherinem recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT delahuntmarisa recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT hardidgeandrew recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT smithpaul recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT tranphong recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT mcdonaldluke recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT kefalianosemmanuel recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT danielcathy recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT berneysue recumbentcyclingtoimproveoutcomesinpeoplewithhipfractureafeasibilityrandomizedtrial