Cargando…

Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing focus to improve the quality of recovery following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Postoperative pain and nausea are the most common reasons for prolonged hospital stay and readmission after ACSS. Superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides site-sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulcahy, Michael J., Elalingam, Thananchayan, Jang, Kevin, D’Souza, Mario, Tait, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05377-4
_version_ 1783715878460719104
author Mulcahy, Michael J.
Elalingam, Thananchayan
Jang, Kevin
D’Souza, Mario
Tait, Matthew
author_facet Mulcahy, Michael J.
Elalingam, Thananchayan
Jang, Kevin
D’Souza, Mario
Tait, Matthew
author_sort Mulcahy, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been increasing focus to improve the quality of recovery following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Postoperative pain and nausea are the most common reasons for prolonged hospital stay and readmission after ACSS. Superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides site-specific analgesia with minimal side effects, thereby improving the quality of recovery. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect bilateral cervical plexus block has on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing ACSS. METHODS: The study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, blinded, parallel-group, randomised placebo-controlled trial. 136 eligible patients (68 in each group) undergoing ACSS will be included. Patients randomised to the intervention group will have a SCPB administered under ultrasound guidance with a local anaesthetic solution (0.2% ropivacaine, 15mL); patients randomised to the placebo group will be injected in an identical manner with a saline solution. The primary outcome is the 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire score at 24 h after surgery. In addition, comparisons between groups will be made for a 24-h opioid usage and length of hospital stay. Neck pain intensity will be quantified using the numeric rating scale at 1, 3, 6 and at 24 h postoperatively. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, dysphagia or hoarseness in the first 24 h after surgery will also be measured. DISCUSSION: By conducting a blinded placebo trial, we aim to control for the bias inherently associated with a tangible medical intervention and show the true treatment effect of SCPB in ACSS. A statistically significant result will indicate an overall improved quality of recovery for patients; alternatively, if no benefit is shown, this trial will provide evidence that this intervention is unnecessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ACTRN12619000028101. Prospectively registered on 11 January 2019 with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82441652021-06-30 Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial Mulcahy, Michael J. Elalingam, Thananchayan Jang, Kevin D’Souza, Mario Tait, Matthew Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There has been increasing focus to improve the quality of recovery following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Postoperative pain and nausea are the most common reasons for prolonged hospital stay and readmission after ACSS. Superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides site-specific analgesia with minimal side effects, thereby improving the quality of recovery. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect bilateral cervical plexus block has on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing ACSS. METHODS: The study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, blinded, parallel-group, randomised placebo-controlled trial. 136 eligible patients (68 in each group) undergoing ACSS will be included. Patients randomised to the intervention group will have a SCPB administered under ultrasound guidance with a local anaesthetic solution (0.2% ropivacaine, 15mL); patients randomised to the placebo group will be injected in an identical manner with a saline solution. The primary outcome is the 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire score at 24 h after surgery. In addition, comparisons between groups will be made for a 24-h opioid usage and length of hospital stay. Neck pain intensity will be quantified using the numeric rating scale at 1, 3, 6 and at 24 h postoperatively. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, dysphagia or hoarseness in the first 24 h after surgery will also be measured. DISCUSSION: By conducting a blinded placebo trial, we aim to control for the bias inherently associated with a tangible medical intervention and show the true treatment effect of SCPB in ACSS. A statistically significant result will indicate an overall improved quality of recovery for patients; alternatively, if no benefit is shown, this trial will provide evidence that this intervention is unnecessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ACTRN12619000028101. Prospectively registered on 11 January 2019 with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry BioMed Central 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8244165/ /pubmed/34187541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05377-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mulcahy, Michael J.
Elalingam, Thananchayan
Jang, Kevin
D’Souza, Mario
Tait, Matthew
Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
title Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
title_full Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
title_fullStr Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
title_short Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
title_sort bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05377-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mulcahymichaelj bilateralcervicalplexusblockforanteriorcervicalspinesurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT elalingamthananchayan bilateralcervicalplexusblockforanteriorcervicalspinesurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT jangkevin bilateralcervicalplexusblockforanteriorcervicalspinesurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT dsouzamario bilateralcervicalplexusblockforanteriorcervicalspinesurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT taitmatthew bilateralcervicalplexusblockforanteriorcervicalspinesurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrial