Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S):...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005 |
_version_ | 1783715903242764288 |
---|---|
author | Facadio Antero, Maria Singh, Bhuchitra Pradhan, Apoorva Gornet, Megan Kearns, William G. Baker, Valerie Christianson, Mindy S. |
author_facet | Facadio Antero, Maria Singh, Bhuchitra Pradhan, Apoorva Gornet, Megan Kearns, William G. Baker, Valerie Christianson, Mindy S. |
author_sort | Facadio Antero, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Comparison between the cost of IVF with PGT-A vs. IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The model analyzed a hypothetical single fresh oocyte donor IVF cycle with PGT-A vs. IVF alone and followed the progression of a single embryo through the different decision nodes. Cost estimates assigned to each clinical event were based on data obtained from the literature and institutional costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cost per live birth. RESULT(S): In the base-case analysis, IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in fresh donor oocyte cycles when compared with IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The cycles using PGT-A cost an additional $6,018.66. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $119,606.59 per additional live birth achieved with IVF with PGT-A. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in nearly all iterations. CONCLUSION(S): PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte IVF cycles is not cost effective compared with IVF alone over a wide range of probabilities and costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8244284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82442842021-07-02 Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles Facadio Antero, Maria Singh, Bhuchitra Pradhan, Apoorva Gornet, Megan Kearns, William G. Baker, Valerie Christianson, Mindy S. F S Rep Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Comparison between the cost of IVF with PGT-A vs. IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The model analyzed a hypothetical single fresh oocyte donor IVF cycle with PGT-A vs. IVF alone and followed the progression of a single embryo through the different decision nodes. Cost estimates assigned to each clinical event were based on data obtained from the literature and institutional costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cost per live birth. RESULT(S): In the base-case analysis, IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in fresh donor oocyte cycles when compared with IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The cycles using PGT-A cost an additional $6,018.66. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $119,606.59 per additional live birth achieved with IVF with PGT-A. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in nearly all iterations. CONCLUSION(S): PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte IVF cycles is not cost effective compared with IVF alone over a wide range of probabilities and costs. Elsevier 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8244284/ /pubmed/34223271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Facadio Antero, Maria Singh, Bhuchitra Pradhan, Apoorva Gornet, Megan Kearns, William G. Baker, Valerie Christianson, Mindy S. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
title | Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT facadioanteromaria costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles AT singhbhuchitra costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles AT pradhanapoorva costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles AT gornetmegan costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles AT kearnswilliamg costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles AT bakervalerie costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles AT christiansonmindys costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles |