Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S):...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Facadio Antero, Maria, Singh, Bhuchitra, Pradhan, Apoorva, Gornet, Megan, Kearns, William G., Baker, Valerie, Christianson, Mindy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005
_version_ 1783715903242764288
author Facadio Antero, Maria
Singh, Bhuchitra
Pradhan, Apoorva
Gornet, Megan
Kearns, William G.
Baker, Valerie
Christianson, Mindy S.
author_facet Facadio Antero, Maria
Singh, Bhuchitra
Pradhan, Apoorva
Gornet, Megan
Kearns, William G.
Baker, Valerie
Christianson, Mindy S.
author_sort Facadio Antero, Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Comparison between the cost of IVF with PGT-A vs. IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The model analyzed a hypothetical single fresh oocyte donor IVF cycle with PGT-A vs. IVF alone and followed the progression of a single embryo through the different decision nodes. Cost estimates assigned to each clinical event were based on data obtained from the literature and institutional costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cost per live birth. RESULT(S): In the base-case analysis, IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in fresh donor oocyte cycles when compared with IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The cycles using PGT-A cost an additional $6,018.66. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $119,606.59 per additional live birth achieved with IVF with PGT-A. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in nearly all iterations. CONCLUSION(S): PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte IVF cycles is not cost effective compared with IVF alone over a wide range of probabilities and costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82442842021-07-02 Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles Facadio Antero, Maria Singh, Bhuchitra Pradhan, Apoorva Gornet, Megan Kearns, William G. Baker, Valerie Christianson, Mindy S. F S Rep Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Comparison between the cost of IVF with PGT-A vs. IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The model analyzed a hypothetical single fresh oocyte donor IVF cycle with PGT-A vs. IVF alone and followed the progression of a single embryo through the different decision nodes. Cost estimates assigned to each clinical event were based on data obtained from the literature and institutional costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cost per live birth. RESULT(S): In the base-case analysis, IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in fresh donor oocyte cycles when compared with IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The cycles using PGT-A cost an additional $6,018.66. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $119,606.59 per additional live birth achieved with IVF with PGT-A. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in nearly all iterations. CONCLUSION(S): PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte IVF cycles is not cost effective compared with IVF alone over a wide range of probabilities and costs. Elsevier 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8244284/ /pubmed/34223271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Facadio Antero, Maria
Singh, Bhuchitra
Pradhan, Apoorva
Gornet, Megan
Kearns, William G.
Baker, Valerie
Christianson, Mindy S.
Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
title Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
title_full Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
title_short Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
title_sort cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005
work_keys_str_mv AT facadioanteromaria costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles
AT singhbhuchitra costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles
AT pradhanapoorva costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles
AT gornetmegan costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles
AT kearnswilliamg costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles
AT bakervalerie costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles
AT christiansonmindys costeffectivenessofpreimplantationgenetictestingforaneuploidyforfreshdonoroocytecycles