Cargando…

NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department

AIM: To test National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill general medical patients in the emergency department (ED), by 1) testing NEWS2s prediction of and association with primary outcome ‘mortality’ (hospital or 30 day) and secondary outcomes ‘...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engebretsen, Stine, Bogstrand, Stig Tore, Jacobsen, Dag, Vitelli, Valeria, Rimstad, Rune
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100020
_version_ 1783715924662026240
author Engebretsen, Stine
Bogstrand, Stig Tore
Jacobsen, Dag
Vitelli, Valeria
Rimstad, Rune
author_facet Engebretsen, Stine
Bogstrand, Stig Tore
Jacobsen, Dag
Vitelli, Valeria
Rimstad, Rune
author_sort Engebretsen, Stine
collection PubMed
description AIM: To test National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill general medical patients in the emergency department (ED), by 1) testing NEWS2s prediction of and association with primary outcome ‘mortality’ (hospital or 30 day) and secondary outcomes ‘intensive care unit (ICU) admission’ and ‘critical care in ED’ and 2) comparing this for different NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system in use. METHODS: Register-data on adult triage 1 and 2 patients with complete NEWS2 from 2015 and 2016 were retrieved. Prediction was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Associations were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: 1586 patients were included. NEWS2 showed poor prediction of ‘mortality’ (AUC 0.686, CI 0.633–0.739) and adequate prediction of ‘ICU admission’ (AUC 0.716, CI 0.690–0.742) and ‘critical care in ED’ (AUC 0.756, CI 0.732–0.780). It was strongly associated with all outcomes (all p<0.001). All NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system showed poor prediction of all outcomes (all AUCs <0.7). The single-parameter system had the strongest association with ‘mortality’ (OR 1.688, CI 1.052–2.708, p<0.05) and ‘critical care in ED’ (OR 3.267, CI 2.490–4.286, p<0.001). NEWS2 > 4 had the strongest association with ‘ICU admission’ (OR 2.339, CI 1.742–3.141, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: For identification in order to trigger a response in the ED, outcomes closest in time seem most clinically relevant. As such, the single-parameter system had acceptable performance. NEWS2 > 4 should be considered as an additional trigger due to its association with ICU admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82443932021-07-02 NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department Engebretsen, Stine Bogstrand, Stig Tore Jacobsen, Dag Vitelli, Valeria Rimstad, Rune Resusc Plus Clinical Paper AIM: To test National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill general medical patients in the emergency department (ED), by 1) testing NEWS2s prediction of and association with primary outcome ‘mortality’ (hospital or 30 day) and secondary outcomes ‘intensive care unit (ICU) admission’ and ‘critical care in ED’ and 2) comparing this for different NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system in use. METHODS: Register-data on adult triage 1 and 2 patients with complete NEWS2 from 2015 and 2016 were retrieved. Prediction was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Associations were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: 1586 patients were included. NEWS2 showed poor prediction of ‘mortality’ (AUC 0.686, CI 0.633–0.739) and adequate prediction of ‘ICU admission’ (AUC 0.716, CI 0.690–0.742) and ‘critical care in ED’ (AUC 0.756, CI 0.732–0.780). It was strongly associated with all outcomes (all p<0.001). All NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system showed poor prediction of all outcomes (all AUCs <0.7). The single-parameter system had the strongest association with ‘mortality’ (OR 1.688, CI 1.052–2.708, p<0.05) and ‘critical care in ED’ (OR 3.267, CI 2.490–4.286, p<0.001). NEWS2 > 4 had the strongest association with ‘ICU admission’ (OR 2.339, CI 1.742–3.141, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: For identification in order to trigger a response in the ED, outcomes closest in time seem most clinically relevant. As such, the single-parameter system had acceptable performance. NEWS2 > 4 should be considered as an additional trigger due to its association with ICU admission. Elsevier 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8244393/ /pubmed/34223303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100020 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Paper
Engebretsen, Stine
Bogstrand, Stig Tore
Jacobsen, Dag
Vitelli, Valeria
Rimstad, Rune
NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_full NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_fullStr NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_short NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_sort news2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
topic Clinical Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100020
work_keys_str_mv AT engebretsenstine news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT bogstrandstigtore news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT jacobsendag news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT vitellivaleria news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT rimstadrune news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment