Cargando…

Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of initial steps of newborn resuscitation according to the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics’ Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines in the prehospital setting. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of 265 paramedics and Emergency M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huynh, Trang Kieu, Schoonover, Amanda, Harrod, Tabria, Bahr, Nathan, Guise, Jeanne-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100086
_version_ 1783715926865084416
author Huynh, Trang Kieu
Schoonover, Amanda
Harrod, Tabria
Bahr, Nathan
Guise, Jeanne-Marie
author_facet Huynh, Trang Kieu
Schoonover, Amanda
Harrod, Tabria
Bahr, Nathan
Guise, Jeanne-Marie
author_sort Huynh, Trang Kieu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of initial steps of newborn resuscitation according to the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics’ Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines in the prehospital setting. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of 265 paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) from 45 EMS teams recruited from public fire and private transport agencies in a major metropolitan area. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire assessing demographics, experience, and comfort in caring for children. Simulations were conducted April 2015 to March 2016. Technical performance was evaluated by blinded video review. NRP actions were assessed using a structured performance tool. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five EMS providers responded to survey questions and participated in simulations. In total, 16% reported feeling very or extremely comfortable caring for children <30 days of age (vs. 71% for children aged 12–18 years). Among 45 EMS teams participating in simulations, 22% (n = 10) dried, 18% (n = 8) stimulated, and 2% (n = 1) warmed within 30 s from arrival and 11% (n = 5) provided BMV within 60 s from arrival, as recommended by NRP. All teams provided BMV. Eighty-eight percent bagged below NRP rate recommendations and 96% bagged with tidal volume exceeding guidelines. Looking over the entire 10-min simulation for ever performing measures, 73% started to dry the baby within a median of 51 (range 0−539) seconds from arrival, 38% started to stimulate the baby within a median of 34 s (range 0−181), and 44% started to warm the baby within a median 291 s (range 27−575 s). CONCLUSIONS: These data from field simulations suggest NRP steps recommended for the first minute after birth are seldom performed in a timely manner and suggests opportunities for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82444042021-07-02 Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation Huynh, Trang Kieu Schoonover, Amanda Harrod, Tabria Bahr, Nathan Guise, Jeanne-Marie Resusc Plus Simulation and Education OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of initial steps of newborn resuscitation according to the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics’ Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines in the prehospital setting. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of 265 paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) from 45 EMS teams recruited from public fire and private transport agencies in a major metropolitan area. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire assessing demographics, experience, and comfort in caring for children. Simulations were conducted April 2015 to March 2016. Technical performance was evaluated by blinded video review. NRP actions were assessed using a structured performance tool. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five EMS providers responded to survey questions and participated in simulations. In total, 16% reported feeling very or extremely comfortable caring for children <30 days of age (vs. 71% for children aged 12–18 years). Among 45 EMS teams participating in simulations, 22% (n = 10) dried, 18% (n = 8) stimulated, and 2% (n = 1) warmed within 30 s from arrival and 11% (n = 5) provided BMV within 60 s from arrival, as recommended by NRP. All teams provided BMV. Eighty-eight percent bagged below NRP rate recommendations and 96% bagged with tidal volume exceeding guidelines. Looking over the entire 10-min simulation for ever performing measures, 73% started to dry the baby within a median of 51 (range 0−539) seconds from arrival, 38% started to stimulate the baby within a median of 34 s (range 0−181), and 44% started to warm the baby within a median 291 s (range 27−575 s). CONCLUSIONS: These data from field simulations suggest NRP steps recommended for the first minute after birth are seldom performed in a timely manner and suggests opportunities for improvement. Elsevier 2021-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8244404/ /pubmed/34223352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100086 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Simulation and Education
Huynh, Trang Kieu
Schoonover, Amanda
Harrod, Tabria
Bahr, Nathan
Guise, Jeanne-Marie
Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
title Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
title_full Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
title_fullStr Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
title_short Characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
title_sort characterizing prehospital response to neonatal resuscitation
topic Simulation and Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100086
work_keys_str_mv AT huynhtrangkieu characterizingprehospitalresponsetoneonatalresuscitation
AT schoonoveramanda characterizingprehospitalresponsetoneonatalresuscitation
AT harrodtabria characterizingprehospitalresponsetoneonatalresuscitation
AT bahrnathan characterizingprehospitalresponsetoneonatalresuscitation
AT guisejeannemarie characterizingprehospitalresponsetoneonatalresuscitation