Cargando…

Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of advance directives, healthcare proxies, and legal representatives in Austrian intensive care units (ICUs), and to explore barriers faced by adults engaged in the contemplation and documentation phase of the advance care planning process. METHODS: Two studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köstenberger, Markus, Diegelmann, Svenja, Terlutter, Ralf, Bidmon, Sonja, Neuwersch, Stefan, Likar, Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100014
_version_ 1783715943183024128
author Köstenberger, Markus
Diegelmann, Svenja
Terlutter, Ralf
Bidmon, Sonja
Neuwersch, Stefan
Likar, Rudolf
author_facet Köstenberger, Markus
Diegelmann, Svenja
Terlutter, Ralf
Bidmon, Sonja
Neuwersch, Stefan
Likar, Rudolf
author_sort Köstenberger, Markus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of advance directives, healthcare proxies, and legal representatives in Austrian intensive care units (ICUs), and to explore barriers faced by adults engaged in the contemplation and documentation phase of the advance care planning process. METHODS: Two studies were conducted: (1) A 4-week multicenter study covering seven Austrian ICUs. A retrospective chart review of 475 patients who presented to the ICUs between 1 January 2019 and 31 January 2019 was conducted. (2) An interview and focus group study with 12 semi-structured expert interviews and three focus groups with 21 adults was performed to gain insights into potential barriers faced by Austrian adults planning medical decisions in advance. RESULTS: Of the 475 ICU patients, 3 (0.6%) had an advance directive, 4 (0.8%) had a healthcare proxy, and 7 (1.5%) had a legal guardian. Despite the low prevalence rates, patients and relatives reacted positively to the question of whether they had an advance directive. Patients older than 55 years and patients with children reacted significantly more positively than younger patients and patients without children. The interviews and focus groups revealed important barriers that prevent adults in Austria from considering planning in advance for potentially critical health states. CONCLUSION: The studies show low prevalence rates of healthcare documents in Austrian ICUs. However, when patients were asked about an advance directive, reactions indicated positive attitudes. The gap between positive attitudes and actual document completion can be explained by multiple barriers that exist for adults in Austria when it comes to planning for potential future incapacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82444812021-07-02 Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers Köstenberger, Markus Diegelmann, Svenja Terlutter, Ralf Bidmon, Sonja Neuwersch, Stefan Likar, Rudolf Resusc Plus Clinical Paper PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of advance directives, healthcare proxies, and legal representatives in Austrian intensive care units (ICUs), and to explore barriers faced by adults engaged in the contemplation and documentation phase of the advance care planning process. METHODS: Two studies were conducted: (1) A 4-week multicenter study covering seven Austrian ICUs. A retrospective chart review of 475 patients who presented to the ICUs between 1 January 2019 and 31 January 2019 was conducted. (2) An interview and focus group study with 12 semi-structured expert interviews and three focus groups with 21 adults was performed to gain insights into potential barriers faced by Austrian adults planning medical decisions in advance. RESULTS: Of the 475 ICU patients, 3 (0.6%) had an advance directive, 4 (0.8%) had a healthcare proxy, and 7 (1.5%) had a legal guardian. Despite the low prevalence rates, patients and relatives reacted positively to the question of whether they had an advance directive. Patients older than 55 years and patients with children reacted significantly more positively than younger patients and patients without children. The interviews and focus groups revealed important barriers that prevent adults in Austria from considering planning in advance for potentially critical health states. CONCLUSION: The studies show low prevalence rates of healthcare documents in Austrian ICUs. However, when patients were asked about an advance directive, reactions indicated positive attitudes. The gap between positive attitudes and actual document completion can be explained by multiple barriers that exist for adults in Austria when it comes to planning for potential future incapacity. Elsevier 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8244481/ /pubmed/34223298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100014 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Paper
Köstenberger, Markus
Diegelmann, Svenja
Terlutter, Ralf
Bidmon, Sonja
Neuwersch, Stefan
Likar, Rudolf
Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers
title Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers
title_full Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers
title_fullStr Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers
title_full_unstemmed Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers
title_short Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers
title_sort advance directives in austrian intensive care units: an analysis of prevalence and barriers
topic Clinical Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100014
work_keys_str_mv AT kostenbergermarkus advancedirectivesinaustrianintensivecareunitsananalysisofprevalenceandbarriers
AT diegelmannsvenja advancedirectivesinaustrianintensivecareunitsananalysisofprevalenceandbarriers
AT terlutterralf advancedirectivesinaustrianintensivecareunitsananalysisofprevalenceandbarriers
AT bidmonsonja advancedirectivesinaustrianintensivecareunitsananalysisofprevalenceandbarriers
AT neuwerschstefan advancedirectivesinaustrianintensivecareunitsananalysisofprevalenceandbarriers
AT likarrudolf advancedirectivesinaustrianintensivecareunitsananalysisofprevalenceandbarriers