Cargando…

Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics

AIM: To evaluate neonatal and paediatric life support training practices across Europe. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study. Paediatric residents, general paediatricians, and subspecialists were surveyed to assess how paediatric basic and advanced life support (PBLS/PALS) and neonatal life sup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binkhorst, Mathijs, van der Aar, Inge M., Linders, Marjolein, van Heijst, Arno F.J., de Boode, Willem P., Draaisma, Jos M.T., Hogeveen, Marije
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100063
_version_ 1783715951431122944
author Binkhorst, Mathijs
van der Aar, Inge M.
Linders, Marjolein
van Heijst, Arno F.J.
de Boode, Willem P.
Draaisma, Jos M.T.
Hogeveen, Marije
author_facet Binkhorst, Mathijs
van der Aar, Inge M.
Linders, Marjolein
van Heijst, Arno F.J.
de Boode, Willem P.
Draaisma, Jos M.T.
Hogeveen, Marije
author_sort Binkhorst, Mathijs
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate neonatal and paediatric life support training practices across Europe. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study. Paediatric residents, general paediatricians, and subspecialists were surveyed to assess how paediatric basic and advanced life support (PBLS/PALS) and neonatal life support (NLS) are practically arranged and utilised throughout Europe. A mini-Delphi approach was used for survey development. Eligible professionals in general and university hospitals received a web link to the survey. RESULTS: 498 respondents from 16 countries were included. A large majority of responses came from the Netherlands (n = 393) and Belgium (n = 42). Therefore, analysis was based on these responses. PBLS was more frequently offered than PALS and NLS, though not to all professionals caring for children. For PBLS, PALS, and NLS, official recertification varied between 35–75%. Approximately 80–90% had read the latest guidelines, at least partially. Sixty to seventy percent felt capable of instant PALS, 75–90% considered themselves able to perform PBLS and NLS instantly. Not reading the guidelines and less confidence about instant resuscitation seemed to occur more often in the lower and higher age/experience groups compared to the intermediate age/experience groups. A quarter of the respondents <30 years did not feel prepared for instant PALS. General paediatricians appeared to feel most capable of instant resuscitation. General and university hospitals had rather similar training practices and facilities. Manikins were predominantly low-fidelity, especially in general hospitals. Barriers to course participation were high costs, lack of time, the non-compulsory status, remote location, and unavailability of courses. CONCLUSION: Although most paediatric professionals receive life support training, guideline reading, recertification, training utilisation, and resuscitation preparedness require improvement. Barriers to course participation should be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82445152021-07-02 Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics Binkhorst, Mathijs van der Aar, Inge M. Linders, Marjolein van Heijst, Arno F.J. de Boode, Willem P. Draaisma, Jos M.T. Hogeveen, Marije Resusc Plus Simulation and Education AIM: To evaluate neonatal and paediatric life support training practices across Europe. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study. Paediatric residents, general paediatricians, and subspecialists were surveyed to assess how paediatric basic and advanced life support (PBLS/PALS) and neonatal life support (NLS) are practically arranged and utilised throughout Europe. A mini-Delphi approach was used for survey development. Eligible professionals in general and university hospitals received a web link to the survey. RESULTS: 498 respondents from 16 countries were included. A large majority of responses came from the Netherlands (n = 393) and Belgium (n = 42). Therefore, analysis was based on these responses. PBLS was more frequently offered than PALS and NLS, though not to all professionals caring for children. For PBLS, PALS, and NLS, official recertification varied between 35–75%. Approximately 80–90% had read the latest guidelines, at least partially. Sixty to seventy percent felt capable of instant PALS, 75–90% considered themselves able to perform PBLS and NLS instantly. Not reading the guidelines and less confidence about instant resuscitation seemed to occur more often in the lower and higher age/experience groups compared to the intermediate age/experience groups. A quarter of the respondents <30 years did not feel prepared for instant PALS. General paediatricians appeared to feel most capable of instant resuscitation. General and university hospitals had rather similar training practices and facilities. Manikins were predominantly low-fidelity, especially in general hospitals. Barriers to course participation were high costs, lack of time, the non-compulsory status, remote location, and unavailability of courses. CONCLUSION: Although most paediatric professionals receive life support training, guideline reading, recertification, training utilisation, and resuscitation preparedness require improvement. Barriers to course participation should be addressed. Elsevier 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8244515/ /pubmed/34223335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100063 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Simulation and Education
Binkhorst, Mathijs
van der Aar, Inge M.
Linders, Marjolein
van Heijst, Arno F.J.
de Boode, Willem P.
Draaisma, Jos M.T.
Hogeveen, Marije
Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
title Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
title_full Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
title_fullStr Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
title_full_unstemmed Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
title_short Training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: A survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
title_sort training practices in neonatal and paediatric life support: a survey among healthcare professionals working in paediatrics
topic Simulation and Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100063
work_keys_str_mv AT binkhorstmathijs trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics
AT vanderaaringem trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics
AT lindersmarjolein trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics
AT vanheijstarnofj trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics
AT deboodewillemp trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics
AT draaismajosmt trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics
AT hogeveenmarije trainingpracticesinneonatalandpaediatriclifesupportasurveyamonghealthcareprofessionalsworkinginpaediatrics