Cargando…

Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE: Research into echocardiography (echo) during cardiac arrest has suffered from methodological flaws that limit aggregation of findings. We developed and validated a novel image rating scale for qualitative analysis of echo images obtained during resuscitation. METHODS: A novel 5-point ordi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaspari, Romolo, Teran, Felipe, Kamilaris, Andrew, Gleeson, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100097
_version_ 1783715951910322176
author Gaspari, Romolo
Teran, Felipe
Kamilaris, Andrew
Gleeson, Timothy
author_facet Gaspari, Romolo
Teran, Felipe
Kamilaris, Andrew
Gleeson, Timothy
author_sort Gaspari, Romolo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Research into echocardiography (echo) during cardiac arrest has suffered from methodological flaws that limit aggregation of findings. We developed and validated a novel image rating scale for qualitative analysis of echo images obtained during resuscitation. METHODS: A novel 5-point ordinal rating scale was developed and validated using recorded echo images from 145 consecutive cardiac arrest patients. Recorded echo images were reviewed in a blinded fashion by investigators experienced in cardiac arrest echo, and image quality was rated using this scale. Cardiac activity was subsequently classified as no activity, disorganized activity and organized activity. The primary outcome was inter-rater agreement using the image quality rating scale. Secondary outcome was the qualitative evaluation of the type of cardiac activity. RESULTS: A total of 235 ultrasounds were analyzed by study investigators using the image quality rating scale. The overall image quality agreement between reviewers using the scale was good with a weighted kappa of 0.65. Agreement for image quality in subxyphoid images was greater than in parasternal images (0.65–0.52). Echo analysis of cardiac activity showed no activity (33%), disorganized activity (18%), and organized activity (49%). Agreement was great for presence or absence of “cardiac activity” and “organized cardiac activity” with a kappa of 0.84 and 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: A novel image quality rating scale for echo during cardiac arrest demonstrates substantial agreement between reviewers. Agreement regarding the presence or absence, as well as the organization of cardiac activity was substantial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82445172021-07-02 Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest Gaspari, Romolo Teran, Felipe Kamilaris, Andrew Gleeson, Timothy Resusc Plus Clinical Paper OBJECTIVE: Research into echocardiography (echo) during cardiac arrest has suffered from methodological flaws that limit aggregation of findings. We developed and validated a novel image rating scale for qualitative analysis of echo images obtained during resuscitation. METHODS: A novel 5-point ordinal rating scale was developed and validated using recorded echo images from 145 consecutive cardiac arrest patients. Recorded echo images were reviewed in a blinded fashion by investigators experienced in cardiac arrest echo, and image quality was rated using this scale. Cardiac activity was subsequently classified as no activity, disorganized activity and organized activity. The primary outcome was inter-rater agreement using the image quality rating scale. Secondary outcome was the qualitative evaluation of the type of cardiac activity. RESULTS: A total of 235 ultrasounds were analyzed by study investigators using the image quality rating scale. The overall image quality agreement between reviewers using the scale was good with a weighted kappa of 0.65. Agreement for image quality in subxyphoid images was greater than in parasternal images (0.65–0.52). Echo analysis of cardiac activity showed no activity (33%), disorganized activity (18%), and organized activity (49%). Agreement was great for presence or absence of “cardiac activity” and “organized cardiac activity” with a kappa of 0.84 and 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: A novel image quality rating scale for echo during cardiac arrest demonstrates substantial agreement between reviewers. Agreement regarding the presence or absence, as well as the organization of cardiac activity was substantial. Elsevier 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8244517/ /pubmed/34223362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100097 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Paper
Gaspari, Romolo
Teran, Felipe
Kamilaris, Andrew
Gleeson, Timothy
Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
title Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
title_full Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
title_fullStr Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
title_short Development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
title_sort development and validation of a novel image quality rating scale for echocardiography during cardiac arrest
topic Clinical Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100097
work_keys_str_mv AT gaspariromolo developmentandvalidationofanovelimagequalityratingscaleforechocardiographyduringcardiacarrest
AT teranfelipe developmentandvalidationofanovelimagequalityratingscaleforechocardiographyduringcardiacarrest
AT kamilarisandrew developmentandvalidationofanovelimagequalityratingscaleforechocardiographyduringcardiacarrest
AT gleesontimothy developmentandvalidationofanovelimagequalityratingscaleforechocardiographyduringcardiacarrest