Cargando…

Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy

Temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with impairment in episodic memory. A substantial subgroup, however, is able to maintain adequate memory despite temporal lobe pathology. Missing from prior work in cognitive reorganization is a direct comparison of temporal lobe epilepsy patients with intact sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tracy, Joseph I, Chaudhary, Kapil, Modi, Shilpi, Crow, Andrew, Kumar, Ashith, Weinstein, David, Sperling, Michael R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34222865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab025
_version_ 1783715972061855744
author Tracy, Joseph I
Chaudhary, Kapil
Modi, Shilpi
Crow, Andrew
Kumar, Ashith
Weinstein, David
Sperling, Michael R
author_facet Tracy, Joseph I
Chaudhary, Kapil
Modi, Shilpi
Crow, Andrew
Kumar, Ashith
Weinstein, David
Sperling, Michael R
author_sort Tracy, Joseph I
collection PubMed
description Temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with impairment in episodic memory. A substantial subgroup, however, is able to maintain adequate memory despite temporal lobe pathology. Missing from prior work in cognitive reorganization is a direct comparison of temporal lobe epilepsy patients with intact status with those who are memory impaired. Little is known about the regional activations, functional connectivities and/or network reconfigurations that implement changes in primary computations or support functions that drive adaptive plasticity and compensated memory. We utilized task functional MRI on 54 unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy patients and 24 matched healthy controls during the performance of a paired-associate memory task to address three questions: (i) which regions implement paired-associate memory in temporal lobe epilepsy, and do they vary as a function of good versus poor performance, (ii) is there unique functional connectivity present during memory encoding that accounts for intact status by preservation of primary memory computations or the supportive computations that allow for intact memory responses and (iii) what features during memory encoding are most distinctive: is it the magnitude and location of regional activations, or the presence of enhanced functional connections to key structures such as the hippocampus? The study revealed non-dominant hemisphere regions (right posterior temporal regions) involving both increased regional activity and increased modulatory communication with the hippocampi as most important to intact memory in left temporal lobe epilepsy compared to impaired status. The profile involved areas that are neither contralateral homologues to left hemisphere memory areas, nor regions traditionally considered computationally primary for episodic memory. None of these areas of increased activation or functional connectivity were associated with advantaged memory in healthy controls. Our emphasis on different performance levels yielded insight into two forms of cognitive reorganization: computational primacy, where left temporal lobe epilepsy showed little change relative to healthy controls, and computational support where intact left temporal lobe epilepsy patients showed adaptive abnormalities. The analyses isolated the unique regional activations and mediating functional connectivity that implements truly compensatory reorganization in left temporal lobe epilepsy. The results provided a new perspective on memory deficits by making clear that they arise not just from the knockout of a functional hub, but from the failure to instantiate a complex set of reorganization responses. Such responses provided the computational support to ensure successful memory. We demonstrated that by keeping track of performance levels, we can increase understanding of adaptive brain responses and neuroplasticity in epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82446452021-07-01 Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy Tracy, Joseph I Chaudhary, Kapil Modi, Shilpi Crow, Andrew Kumar, Ashith Weinstein, David Sperling, Michael R Brain Commun Original Article Temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with impairment in episodic memory. A substantial subgroup, however, is able to maintain adequate memory despite temporal lobe pathology. Missing from prior work in cognitive reorganization is a direct comparison of temporal lobe epilepsy patients with intact status with those who are memory impaired. Little is known about the regional activations, functional connectivities and/or network reconfigurations that implement changes in primary computations or support functions that drive adaptive plasticity and compensated memory. We utilized task functional MRI on 54 unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy patients and 24 matched healthy controls during the performance of a paired-associate memory task to address three questions: (i) which regions implement paired-associate memory in temporal lobe epilepsy, and do they vary as a function of good versus poor performance, (ii) is there unique functional connectivity present during memory encoding that accounts for intact status by preservation of primary memory computations or the supportive computations that allow for intact memory responses and (iii) what features during memory encoding are most distinctive: is it the magnitude and location of regional activations, or the presence of enhanced functional connections to key structures such as the hippocampus? The study revealed non-dominant hemisphere regions (right posterior temporal regions) involving both increased regional activity and increased modulatory communication with the hippocampi as most important to intact memory in left temporal lobe epilepsy compared to impaired status. The profile involved areas that are neither contralateral homologues to left hemisphere memory areas, nor regions traditionally considered computationally primary for episodic memory. None of these areas of increased activation or functional connectivity were associated with advantaged memory in healthy controls. Our emphasis on different performance levels yielded insight into two forms of cognitive reorganization: computational primacy, where left temporal lobe epilepsy showed little change relative to healthy controls, and computational support where intact left temporal lobe epilepsy patients showed adaptive abnormalities. The analyses isolated the unique regional activations and mediating functional connectivity that implements truly compensatory reorganization in left temporal lobe epilepsy. The results provided a new perspective on memory deficits by making clear that they arise not just from the knockout of a functional hub, but from the failure to instantiate a complex set of reorganization responses. Such responses provided the computational support to ensure successful memory. We demonstrated that by keeping track of performance levels, we can increase understanding of adaptive brain responses and neuroplasticity in epilepsy. Oxford University Press 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8244645/ /pubmed/34222865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab025 Text en © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tracy, Joseph I
Chaudhary, Kapil
Modi, Shilpi
Crow, Andrew
Kumar, Ashith
Weinstein, David
Sperling, Michael R
Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
title Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
title_full Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
title_fullStr Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
title_short Computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
title_sort computational support, not primacy, distinguishes compensatory memory reorganization in epilepsy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34222865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab025
work_keys_str_mv AT tracyjosephi computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy
AT chaudharykapil computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy
AT modishilpi computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy
AT crowandrew computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy
AT kumarashith computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy
AT weinsteindavid computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy
AT sperlingmichaelr computationalsupportnotprimacydistinguishescompensatorymemoryreorganizationinepilepsy