Cargando…

Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Precarious employment is a significant determinant of population health and health inequities and has complex public health consequences both for a given nation and internationally. Precarious employment is conceptualized as a multi-dimensional construct including but not limited to empl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunn, Virginia, Håkansta, Carin, Vignola, Emilia, Matilla-Santander, Nuria, Kreshpaj, Bertina, Wegman, David H., Hogstedt, Christer, Ahonen, Emily Q., Muntaner, Carles, Baron, Sherry, Bodin, Theo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z
_version_ 1783715976242528256
author Gunn, Virginia
Håkansta, Carin
Vignola, Emilia
Matilla-Santander, Nuria
Kreshpaj, Bertina
Wegman, David H.
Hogstedt, Christer
Ahonen, Emily Q.
Muntaner, Carles
Baron, Sherry
Bodin, Theo
author_facet Gunn, Virginia
Håkansta, Carin
Vignola, Emilia
Matilla-Santander, Nuria
Kreshpaj, Bertina
Wegman, David H.
Hogstedt, Christer
Ahonen, Emily Q.
Muntaner, Carles
Baron, Sherry
Bodin, Theo
author_sort Gunn, Virginia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Precarious employment is a significant determinant of population health and health inequities and has complex public health consequences both for a given nation and internationally. Precarious employment is conceptualized as a multi-dimensional construct including but not limited to employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and lack of rights and protection in the employment relation, which could affect both informal and formal workers. The purpose of this review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize existing research on the effectiveness of initiatives aiming to or having the potential to eliminate, reduce, or mitigate workers’ exposure to precarious employment conditions and its effects on the health and well-being of workers and their families. METHODS: The electronic databases searched (from January 2000 onwards) are Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed, along with three institutional databases as sources of grey literature. We will include any study (e.g. quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods design) evaluating the effects of initiatives that aim to or have the potential to address workers’ exposure to precarious employment or its effects on the health and well-being of workers and their families, whether or not such initiatives were designed specifically to address precarious employment. The primary outcomes will be changes in (i) the prevalence of precarious employment and workers’ exposure to precarious employment and (ii) the health and well-being of precariously employed workers and their families. No secondary outcomes will be included. Given the large body of evidence screened, the initial screening of each study will be done by one reviewer, after implementing several strategies to ensure decision-making consistency across reviewers. The screening of full-text articles, data extraction, and critical appraisal will be done independently by two reviewers. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Established checklists will be used to assess a study’s methodological quality or bias. A narrative synthesis will be employed to describe and summarize the included studies’ characteristics and findings and to explore relationships both within and between the included studies. DISCUSSION: We expect that this review’s findings will provide stakeholders interested in tackling precarious employment and its harmful health effects with evidence on effectiveness of solutions that have been implemented to inform considerations for adaptation of these to their unique contexts. In addition, the review will increase our understanding of existing research gaps and enable us to make recommendations to address them. Our work aligns with the sustainable development agenda to protect workers, promote decent work and economic growth, eliminate poverty, and reduce inequalities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020187544. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82446692021-07-01 Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review Gunn, Virginia Håkansta, Carin Vignola, Emilia Matilla-Santander, Nuria Kreshpaj, Bertina Wegman, David H. Hogstedt, Christer Ahonen, Emily Q. Muntaner, Carles Baron, Sherry Bodin, Theo Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Precarious employment is a significant determinant of population health and health inequities and has complex public health consequences both for a given nation and internationally. Precarious employment is conceptualized as a multi-dimensional construct including but not limited to employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and lack of rights and protection in the employment relation, which could affect both informal and formal workers. The purpose of this review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize existing research on the effectiveness of initiatives aiming to or having the potential to eliminate, reduce, or mitigate workers’ exposure to precarious employment conditions and its effects on the health and well-being of workers and their families. METHODS: The electronic databases searched (from January 2000 onwards) are Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed, along with three institutional databases as sources of grey literature. We will include any study (e.g. quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods design) evaluating the effects of initiatives that aim to or have the potential to address workers’ exposure to precarious employment or its effects on the health and well-being of workers and their families, whether or not such initiatives were designed specifically to address precarious employment. The primary outcomes will be changes in (i) the prevalence of precarious employment and workers’ exposure to precarious employment and (ii) the health and well-being of precariously employed workers and their families. No secondary outcomes will be included. Given the large body of evidence screened, the initial screening of each study will be done by one reviewer, after implementing several strategies to ensure decision-making consistency across reviewers. The screening of full-text articles, data extraction, and critical appraisal will be done independently by two reviewers. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Established checklists will be used to assess a study’s methodological quality or bias. A narrative synthesis will be employed to describe and summarize the included studies’ characteristics and findings and to explore relationships both within and between the included studies. DISCUSSION: We expect that this review’s findings will provide stakeholders interested in tackling precarious employment and its harmful health effects with evidence on effectiveness of solutions that have been implemented to inform considerations for adaptation of these to their unique contexts. In addition, the review will increase our understanding of existing research gaps and enable us to make recommendations to address them. Our work aligns with the sustainable development agenda to protect workers, promote decent work and economic growth, eliminate poverty, and reduce inequalities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020187544. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z. BioMed Central 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8244669/ /pubmed/34193280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Gunn, Virginia
Håkansta, Carin
Vignola, Emilia
Matilla-Santander, Nuria
Kreshpaj, Bertina
Wegman, David H.
Hogstedt, Christer
Ahonen, Emily Q.
Muntaner, Carles
Baron, Sherry
Bodin, Theo
Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
title Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
title_short Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
title_sort initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnvirginia initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT hakanstacarin initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT vignolaemilia initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT matillasantandernuria initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT kreshpajbertina initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wegmandavidh initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT hogstedtchrister initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT ahonenemilyq initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT muntanercarles initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT baronsherry initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT bodintheo initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT initiativesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditseffectsonworkershealthandwellbeingaprotocolforasystematicreview