Cargando…

RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this work was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of reconstructive procedures applied in upper limb soft tissue injuries according to their location. METHODS: The study involved 94 male and 22 female patients (116 total) operated between April 2001 and Novemb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: JELSKI, CARLOS ALBERTO EGUEZ, SZENDLER, GUSTAVO BALADORE, CAVALHEIRO, CRISTINA SCHMITT, VIEIRA, LUIZ ANGELO, CAETANO, EDIE BENEDITO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212902239180
_version_ 1783716002852241408
author JELSKI, CARLOS ALBERTO EGUEZ
SZENDLER, GUSTAVO BALADORE
CAVALHEIRO, CRISTINA SCHMITT
VIEIRA, LUIZ ANGELO
CAETANO, EDIE BENEDITO
author_facet JELSKI, CARLOS ALBERTO EGUEZ
SZENDLER, GUSTAVO BALADORE
CAVALHEIRO, CRISTINA SCHMITT
VIEIRA, LUIZ ANGELO
CAETANO, EDIE BENEDITO
author_sort JELSKI, CARLOS ALBERTO EGUEZ
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this work was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of reconstructive procedures applied in upper limb soft tissue injuries according to their location. METHODS: The study involved 94 male and 22 female patients (116 total) operated between April 2001 and November 2017 due to traumatic injuries in a upper limb. Individuals were evaluated considering their age, sex, etiology, reconstruction area , applied methodology and complications. The finger injuries were excluded. RESULTS: The performed reconstruction procedures include 29 skin grafts; six advancement flaps; seven rotation flaps; 33 pedicled fasciocutaneous flaps, 9 free fasciocutaneous flaps; 5 pedicled muscle flaps; 12 free muscle flaps, three pedicled musculocutaneous flaps; one free musculocutaneous flap; 11 neurovascular free flaps. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive procedures in the upper limbs are diverse, varying from skin grafting to free flaps. The indication of the best option depends on the type of injurie and the surgeon. The final goal is to reach the best functional result combined with the lowest possible morbidity. Level of Evidence IV, Case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82448382021-07-09 RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS JELSKI, CARLOS ALBERTO EGUEZ SZENDLER, GUSTAVO BALADORE CAVALHEIRO, CRISTINA SCHMITT VIEIRA, LUIZ ANGELO CAETANO, EDIE BENEDITO Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this work was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of reconstructive procedures applied in upper limb soft tissue injuries according to their location. METHODS: The study involved 94 male and 22 female patients (116 total) operated between April 2001 and November 2017 due to traumatic injuries in a upper limb. Individuals were evaluated considering their age, sex, etiology, reconstruction area , applied methodology and complications. The finger injuries were excluded. RESULTS: The performed reconstruction procedures include 29 skin grafts; six advancement flaps; seven rotation flaps; 33 pedicled fasciocutaneous flaps, 9 free fasciocutaneous flaps; 5 pedicled muscle flaps; 12 free muscle flaps, three pedicled musculocutaneous flaps; one free musculocutaneous flap; 11 neurovascular free flaps. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive procedures in the upper limbs are diverse, varying from skin grafting to free flaps. The indication of the best option depends on the type of injurie and the surgeon. The final goal is to reach the best functional result combined with the lowest possible morbidity. Level of Evidence IV, Case series. ATHA EDITORA 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8244838/ /pubmed/34248406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212902239180 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
JELSKI, CARLOS ALBERTO EGUEZ
SZENDLER, GUSTAVO BALADORE
CAVALHEIRO, CRISTINA SCHMITT
VIEIRA, LUIZ ANGELO
CAETANO, EDIE BENEDITO
RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS
title RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS
title_full RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS
title_fullStr RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS
title_full_unstemmed RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS
title_short RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER LIMB SOFT TISSUE INJURIES, EXCEPT FOR FINGERTIPS LESIONS
title_sort reconstruction of upper limb soft tissue injuries, except for fingertips lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212902239180
work_keys_str_mv AT jelskicarlosalbertoeguez reconstructionofupperlimbsofttissueinjuriesexceptforfingertipslesions
AT szendlergustavobaladore reconstructionofupperlimbsofttissueinjuriesexceptforfingertipslesions
AT cavalheirocristinaschmitt reconstructionofupperlimbsofttissueinjuriesexceptforfingertipslesions
AT vieiraluizangelo reconstructionofupperlimbsofttissueinjuriesexceptforfingertipslesions
AT caetanoediebenedito reconstructionofupperlimbsofttissueinjuriesexceptforfingertipslesions