Cargando…

Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows

Experiments were performed to determine the effects of feeding method and hay processing (Experiment 1), energy supplement moisture content and feeding method (Experiment 2), and access time to hay (Experiment 3) on cow body weight (BW), dry matter intake (DMI), and hay or energy supplement intake a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaderborg, Jeffery P, Bird, Scott L, Crawford, Grant I, Walker, Ryon S, DiCostanzo, Alfredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34222821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab069
_version_ 1783716030523113472
author Jaderborg, Jeffery P
Bird, Scott L
Crawford, Grant I
Walker, Ryon S
DiCostanzo, Alfredo
author_facet Jaderborg, Jeffery P
Bird, Scott L
Crawford, Grant I
Walker, Ryon S
DiCostanzo, Alfredo
author_sort Jaderborg, Jeffery P
collection PubMed
description Experiments were performed to determine the effects of feeding method and hay processing (Experiment 1), energy supplement moisture content and feeding method (Experiment 2), and access time to hay (Experiment 3) on cow body weight (BW), dry matter intake (DMI), and hay or energy supplement intake and waste. Experiment 1 was designed as a 4 × 4 Latin Square using 48 multiparous, late-gestating, Angus cows (626 kg initial BW). Cows were stratified by age and BW into four treatment groups (n = 12 cows/group); treatment groups were then initially assigned randomly to treatments in a sequence of preset Latin Square periods. In Experiment 1, round bales were processed and delivered on the pen surface or in a bunk, or left unprocessed and delivered in a hay ring or rolled out on the pen surface. Experiment 2 was designed as a 6 × 6 Latin Square utilizing 54 multiparous, late-gestating, Angus cows (616 kg initial BW). Cows were stratified by age and BW into treatment groups (n = 9 cows/group); treatment groups were then initially assigned randomly to treatments in a sequence of preset Latin Square periods. In Experiment 2, corn screenings (CS) or wet beet pulp (BP) were fed in a structure (inverted tire or bunk) or BP only on the pen surface. Experiment 3 was designed as a replicated 3 × 3 Latin Square utilizing 24 multiparous, late-gestating, Angus cows (584 kg initial BW). Cows were stratified by age and BW into treatment groups (n = 8 cows/group); treatment groups were then initially assigned randomly to treatments in a sequence of preset Latin Square periods. In Experiment 3, cows were permitted access to round-bales in a hay ring for 6, 14, or 24 h. In Experiment 1, hay DMI was not affected (P ≥ 0.579). Hay waste was greater (P ≤ 0.007) when hay, processed or not, was fed on the pen surface. In Experiment 2, hay DMI was greatest (P ≤ 0.011) for cows fed no supplement and those fed CS in a bunk. Feeding BP in a bunk led to the greatest (P ≤ 0.003) hay waste. In Experiment 3, cows permitted 6-h access consumed and wasted less (P < 0.001) hay compared with those permitted longer access; BW was unaffected (P ≥ 0.870). In these experiments, cows fed hay on the pen surface, processed or not, achieved similar DMI as those fed in a ring or bunk, but wasted more hay. Delivering BP in a bunk or on the pen surface increased hay and supplement waste, respectively. Controlling access to hay reduced DMI and waste while maintaining cow BW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8244985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82449852021-07-01 Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows Jaderborg, Jeffery P Bird, Scott L Crawford, Grant I Walker, Ryon S DiCostanzo, Alfredo Transl Anim Sci Forage Based Livestock Systems Experiments were performed to determine the effects of feeding method and hay processing (Experiment 1), energy supplement moisture content and feeding method (Experiment 2), and access time to hay (Experiment 3) on cow body weight (BW), dry matter intake (DMI), and hay or energy supplement intake and waste. Experiment 1 was designed as a 4 × 4 Latin Square using 48 multiparous, late-gestating, Angus cows (626 kg initial BW). Cows were stratified by age and BW into four treatment groups (n = 12 cows/group); treatment groups were then initially assigned randomly to treatments in a sequence of preset Latin Square periods. In Experiment 1, round bales were processed and delivered on the pen surface or in a bunk, or left unprocessed and delivered in a hay ring or rolled out on the pen surface. Experiment 2 was designed as a 6 × 6 Latin Square utilizing 54 multiparous, late-gestating, Angus cows (616 kg initial BW). Cows were stratified by age and BW into treatment groups (n = 9 cows/group); treatment groups were then initially assigned randomly to treatments in a sequence of preset Latin Square periods. In Experiment 2, corn screenings (CS) or wet beet pulp (BP) were fed in a structure (inverted tire or bunk) or BP only on the pen surface. Experiment 3 was designed as a replicated 3 × 3 Latin Square utilizing 24 multiparous, late-gestating, Angus cows (584 kg initial BW). Cows were stratified by age and BW into treatment groups (n = 8 cows/group); treatment groups were then initially assigned randomly to treatments in a sequence of preset Latin Square periods. In Experiment 3, cows were permitted access to round-bales in a hay ring for 6, 14, or 24 h. In Experiment 1, hay DMI was not affected (P ≥ 0.579). Hay waste was greater (P ≤ 0.007) when hay, processed or not, was fed on the pen surface. In Experiment 2, hay DMI was greatest (P ≤ 0.011) for cows fed no supplement and those fed CS in a bunk. Feeding BP in a bunk led to the greatest (P ≤ 0.003) hay waste. In Experiment 3, cows permitted 6-h access consumed and wasted less (P < 0.001) hay compared with those permitted longer access; BW was unaffected (P ≥ 0.870). In these experiments, cows fed hay on the pen surface, processed or not, achieved similar DMI as those fed in a ring or bunk, but wasted more hay. Delivering BP in a bunk or on the pen surface increased hay and supplement waste, respectively. Controlling access to hay reduced DMI and waste while maintaining cow BW. Oxford University Press 2021-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8244985/ /pubmed/34222821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab069 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Forage Based Livestock Systems
Jaderborg, Jeffery P
Bird, Scott L
Crawford, Grant I
Walker, Ryon S
DiCostanzo, Alfredo
Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
title Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
title_full Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
title_fullStr Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
title_full_unstemmed Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
title_short Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
title_sort influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows
topic Forage Based Livestock Systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8244985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34222821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab069
work_keys_str_mv AT jaderborgjefferyp influenceofhayfeedingmethodsupplementmoistureoraccesstimeonintakeandwastebybeefcows
AT birdscottl influenceofhayfeedingmethodsupplementmoistureoraccesstimeonintakeandwastebybeefcows
AT crawfordgranti influenceofhayfeedingmethodsupplementmoistureoraccesstimeonintakeandwastebybeefcows
AT walkerryons influenceofhayfeedingmethodsupplementmoistureoraccesstimeonintakeandwastebybeefcows
AT dicostanzoalfredo influenceofhayfeedingmethodsupplementmoistureoraccesstimeonintakeandwastebybeefcows