Cargando…

Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination

Virtual patients (VP) have been advocated as reliable tools for teaching and evaluating clinical skills and competence. We have developed an internet-based, OSCE-like, conversational VP system designed both for training and assessment of medical students. The system, that encompasses complete patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliven, Arie, Nave, Rachel, Baruch, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1946896
_version_ 1783716049102831616
author Oliven, Arie
Nave, Rachel
Baruch, Adam
author_facet Oliven, Arie
Nave, Rachel
Baruch, Adam
author_sort Oliven, Arie
collection PubMed
description Virtual patients (VP) have been advocated as reliable tools for teaching and evaluating clinical skills and competence. We have developed an internet-based, OSCE-like, conversational VP system designed both for training and assessment of medical students. The system, that encompasses complete patient management from H&P to diagnostic procedures and treatment, has now been used regularly during the clerkship of internal medicine. The present article describes the system and compares assessments undertaken with the VP-system over the last five years, to traditional bed-side oral exams. All students practiced on their own exercise VP cases, while preparing for the final exam. A total of 586 students were evaluated simultaneously with both assessment modalities. The αCronbach of the VP exam averaged 0.86. No correlation was found between the grades obtained in the two exams, indicating that the VP exam evaluated different parameters than those assessed by the examiners in the oral examinations. We conclude that a VP system can be utilized as a valid and reliable examination tool. It is also most useful for independent training by students during their ward-based learning, as well as when not studying in classes, wards or clinics, when social distancing is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8245083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82450832021-07-09 Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination Oliven, Arie Nave, Rachel Baruch, Adam Med Educ Online Research Article Virtual patients (VP) have been advocated as reliable tools for teaching and evaluating clinical skills and competence. We have developed an internet-based, OSCE-like, conversational VP system designed both for training and assessment of medical students. The system, that encompasses complete patient management from H&P to diagnostic procedures and treatment, has now been used regularly during the clerkship of internal medicine. The present article describes the system and compares assessments undertaken with the VP-system over the last five years, to traditional bed-side oral exams. All students practiced on their own exercise VP cases, while preparing for the final exam. A total of 586 students were evaluated simultaneously with both assessment modalities. The αCronbach of the VP exam averaged 0.86. No correlation was found between the grades obtained in the two exams, indicating that the VP exam evaluated different parameters than those assessed by the examiners in the oral examinations. We conclude that a VP system can be utilized as a valid and reliable examination tool. It is also most useful for independent training by students during their ward-based learning, as well as when not studying in classes, wards or clinics, when social distancing is required. Taylor & Francis 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8245083/ /pubmed/34180780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1946896 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oliven, Arie
Nave, Rachel
Baruch, Adam
Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
title Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
title_full Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
title_fullStr Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
title_full_unstemmed Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
title_short Long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
title_sort long experience with a web-based, interactive, conversational virtual patient case simulation for medical students’ evaluation: comparison with oral examination
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1946896
work_keys_str_mv AT olivenarie longexperiencewithawebbasedinteractiveconversationalvirtualpatientcasesimulationformedicalstudentsevaluationcomparisonwithoralexamination
AT naverachel longexperiencewithawebbasedinteractiveconversationalvirtualpatientcasesimulationformedicalstudentsevaluationcomparisonwithoralexamination
AT baruchadam longexperiencewithawebbasedinteractiveconversationalvirtualpatientcasesimulationformedicalstudentsevaluationcomparisonwithoralexamination