Cargando…

Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study of medical rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aramanadka, Chithra, Kamath, Abhay T., Srikanth, G., Pai, Deepika, Singla, Nishu, Daundiyal, Shriya, Desai, Avani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9947350
_version_ 1783716069474566144
author Aramanadka, Chithra
Kamath, Abhay T.
Srikanth, G.
Pai, Deepika
Singla, Nishu
Daundiyal, Shriya
Desai, Avani
author_facet Aramanadka, Chithra
Kamath, Abhay T.
Srikanth, G.
Pai, Deepika
Singla, Nishu
Daundiyal, Shriya
Desai, Avani
author_sort Aramanadka, Chithra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study of medical records was performed. Demographics, type of fracture, location, type of miniplate used, the time gap between the insertion and removal, and causes of hardware removal were assessed. RESULTS: About 1472 patients had undergone internal fixation for the facial fractures. Stainless steel miniplate was used in 489 patients, and titanium was used in 983 patients. Out of the 42 cases, 22 cases involved the removal of titanium hardware and 20 patients involved the removal of stainless steel hardware. Infection/osteomyelitis was the main cause of hardware removal. The maximum amount of hardware failure was in the mandible. 78.6% of hardware removal was performed in males. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, routine removal of titanium miniplates can be performed in children to avoid growth disturbances, not indicated in adult patients unless symptomatic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8245212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82452122021-07-12 Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study Aramanadka, Chithra Kamath, Abhay T. Srikanth, G. Pai, Deepika Singla, Nishu Daundiyal, Shriya Desai, Avani ScientificWorldJournal Research Article BACKGROUND: Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study of medical records was performed. Demographics, type of fracture, location, type of miniplate used, the time gap between the insertion and removal, and causes of hardware removal were assessed. RESULTS: About 1472 patients had undergone internal fixation for the facial fractures. Stainless steel miniplate was used in 489 patients, and titanium was used in 983 patients. Out of the 42 cases, 22 cases involved the removal of titanium hardware and 20 patients involved the removal of stainless steel hardware. Infection/osteomyelitis was the main cause of hardware removal. The maximum amount of hardware failure was in the mandible. 78.6% of hardware removal was performed in males. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, routine removal of titanium miniplates can be performed in children to avoid growth disturbances, not indicated in adult patients unless symptomatic. Hindawi 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8245212/ /pubmed/34257626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9947350 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chithra Aramanadka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aramanadka, Chithra
Kamath, Abhay T.
Srikanth, G.
Pai, Deepika
Singla, Nishu
Daundiyal, Shriya
Desai, Avani
Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
title Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
title_full Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
title_short Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
title_sort hardware removal in maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9947350
work_keys_str_mv AT aramanadkachithra hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy
AT kamathabhayt hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy
AT srikanthg hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy
AT paideepika hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy
AT singlanishu hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy
AT daundiyalshriya hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy
AT desaiavani hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy