Cargando…
Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study
BACKGROUND: Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study of medical rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9947350 |
_version_ | 1783716069474566144 |
---|---|
author | Aramanadka, Chithra Kamath, Abhay T. Srikanth, G. Pai, Deepika Singla, Nishu Daundiyal, Shriya Desai, Avani |
author_facet | Aramanadka, Chithra Kamath, Abhay T. Srikanth, G. Pai, Deepika Singla, Nishu Daundiyal, Shriya Desai, Avani |
author_sort | Aramanadka, Chithra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study of medical records was performed. Demographics, type of fracture, location, type of miniplate used, the time gap between the insertion and removal, and causes of hardware removal were assessed. RESULTS: About 1472 patients had undergone internal fixation for the facial fractures. Stainless steel miniplate was used in 489 patients, and titanium was used in 983 patients. Out of the 42 cases, 22 cases involved the removal of titanium hardware and 20 patients involved the removal of stainless steel hardware. Infection/osteomyelitis was the main cause of hardware removal. The maximum amount of hardware failure was in the mandible. 78.6% of hardware removal was performed in males. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, routine removal of titanium miniplates can be performed in children to avoid growth disturbances, not indicated in adult patients unless symptomatic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8245212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82452122021-07-12 Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study Aramanadka, Chithra Kamath, Abhay T. Srikanth, G. Pai, Deepika Singla, Nishu Daundiyal, Shriya Desai, Avani ScientificWorldJournal Research Article BACKGROUND: Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study of medical records was performed. Demographics, type of fracture, location, type of miniplate used, the time gap between the insertion and removal, and causes of hardware removal were assessed. RESULTS: About 1472 patients had undergone internal fixation for the facial fractures. Stainless steel miniplate was used in 489 patients, and titanium was used in 983 patients. Out of the 42 cases, 22 cases involved the removal of titanium hardware and 20 patients involved the removal of stainless steel hardware. Infection/osteomyelitis was the main cause of hardware removal. The maximum amount of hardware failure was in the mandible. 78.6% of hardware removal was performed in males. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, routine removal of titanium miniplates can be performed in children to avoid growth disturbances, not indicated in adult patients unless symptomatic. Hindawi 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8245212/ /pubmed/34257626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9947350 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chithra Aramanadka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aramanadka, Chithra Kamath, Abhay T. Srikanth, G. Pai, Deepika Singla, Nishu Daundiyal, Shriya Desai, Avani Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study |
title | Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | hardware removal in maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9947350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aramanadkachithra hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy AT kamathabhayt hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy AT srikanthg hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy AT paideepika hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy AT singlanishu hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy AT daundiyalshriya hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy AT desaiavani hardwareremovalinmaxillofacialtraumaaretrospectivestudy |