Cargando…

Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is helpful for the evaluation of patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED). However, it remains unclear how much training and how many LUS examinations are needed for ED physicians to obtain proficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: House, Darlene R., Amatya, Yogendra, Nti, Benjamin, Russell, Frances M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00236-4
_version_ 1783716147396345856
author House, Darlene R.
Amatya, Yogendra
Nti, Benjamin
Russell, Frances M.
author_facet House, Darlene R.
Amatya, Yogendra
Nti, Benjamin
Russell, Frances M.
author_sort House, Darlene R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is helpful for the evaluation of patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED). However, it remains unclear how much training and how many LUS examinations are needed for ED physicians to obtain proficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the threshold number of LUS physicians need to perform to achieve proficiency for interpreting LUS on ED patients with dyspnea. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at Patan Hospital in Nepal, evaluating proficiency of physicians novice to LUS. After eight hours of didactics and hands-on training, physicians independently performed and interpreted ultrasounds on patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. An expert sonographer blinded to patient data and LUS interpretation reviewed images and provided an expert interpretation. Interobserver agreement was performed between the study physician and expert physician interpretation. Cumulative sum analysis was used to determine the number of scans required to attain an acceptable level of training. RESULTS: Nineteen physicians were included in the study, submitting 330 LUS examinations with 3288 lung zones. Eighteen physicians (95%) reached proficiency. Physicians reached proficiency for interpreting LUS accurately when compared to an expert after 4.4 (SD 2.2) LUS studies for individual zone interpretation and 4.8 (SD 2.3) studies for overall interpretation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following 1 day of training, the majority of physicians novice to LUS achieved proficiency with interpretation of lung ultrasound after less than five ultrasound examinations performed independently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8245620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82456202021-07-20 Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting House, Darlene R. Amatya, Yogendra Nti, Benjamin Russell, Frances M. Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is helpful for the evaluation of patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED). However, it remains unclear how much training and how many LUS examinations are needed for ED physicians to obtain proficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the threshold number of LUS physicians need to perform to achieve proficiency for interpreting LUS on ED patients with dyspnea. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at Patan Hospital in Nepal, evaluating proficiency of physicians novice to LUS. After eight hours of didactics and hands-on training, physicians independently performed and interpreted ultrasounds on patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. An expert sonographer blinded to patient data and LUS interpretation reviewed images and provided an expert interpretation. Interobserver agreement was performed between the study physician and expert physician interpretation. Cumulative sum analysis was used to determine the number of scans required to attain an acceptable level of training. RESULTS: Nineteen physicians were included in the study, submitting 330 LUS examinations with 3288 lung zones. Eighteen physicians (95%) reached proficiency. Physicians reached proficiency for interpreting LUS accurately when compared to an expert after 4.4 (SD 2.2) LUS studies for individual zone interpretation and 4.8 (SD 2.3) studies for overall interpretation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following 1 day of training, the majority of physicians novice to LUS achieved proficiency with interpretation of lung ultrasound after less than five ultrasound examinations performed independently. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8245620/ /pubmed/34191145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00236-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
House, Darlene R.
Amatya, Yogendra
Nti, Benjamin
Russell, Frances M.
Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
title Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
title_full Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
title_fullStr Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
title_full_unstemmed Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
title_short Lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
title_sort lung ultrasound training and evaluation for proficiency among physicians in a low-resource setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00236-4
work_keys_str_mv AT housedarlener lungultrasoundtrainingandevaluationforproficiencyamongphysiciansinalowresourcesetting
AT amatyayogendra lungultrasoundtrainingandevaluationforproficiencyamongphysiciansinalowresourcesetting
AT ntibenjamin lungultrasoundtrainingandevaluationforproficiencyamongphysiciansinalowresourcesetting
AT russellfrancesm lungultrasoundtrainingandevaluationforproficiencyamongphysiciansinalowresourcesetting