Cargando…

Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches

BACKGROUND: Precise prediction of survival after treatment is of great importance for patients with diseases with high mortality. RNA sequencing data and deep learning (DL) methods are expected to become promising approaches in the development of prediction models in the future. We aimed to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Wei, Guo, Xinggang, Liu, Fuchen, Zhang, Wenli, Wang, Zongyan, Tian, Tao, Tao, Qifei, Hou, Guojun, Zhou, Weiping, Jeong, Seogsong, Xia, Qiang, Liu, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268391
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4828
_version_ 1783716255136481280
author Dong, Wei
Guo, Xinggang
Liu, Fuchen
Zhang, Wenli
Wang, Zongyan
Tian, Tao
Tao, Qifei
Hou, Guojun
Zhou, Weiping
Jeong, Seogsong
Xia, Qiang
Liu, Hui
author_facet Dong, Wei
Guo, Xinggang
Liu, Fuchen
Zhang, Wenli
Wang, Zongyan
Tian, Tao
Tao, Qifei
Hou, Guojun
Zhou, Weiping
Jeong, Seogsong
Xia, Qiang
Liu, Hui
author_sort Dong, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Precise prediction of survival after treatment is of great importance for patients with diseases with high mortality. RNA sequencing data and deep learning (DL) methods are expected to become promising approaches in the development of prediction models in the future. We aimed to evaluate the optimal covariates and methodology for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing surgical resection. METHODS: The Cox proportional hazards regression model and the DL approach were used to develop prediction models incorporating clinical, genetic, and combined clinical and genetic variables for survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. A total of 1,114 patients and 184 patients were enrolled in the present study from 2,163 and 601 patients from Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and Renji Hospital, respectively. The models were internally validated through random sampling and externally validated in clinical cohorts. Between-model comparisons were carried out in terms of the integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index. RESULTS: The Cox and DL clinical models were developed by adopting 7 independent prognostic factors (total bilirubin, prothrombin time, tumor size, tumor number, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion) and 22 clinical factors, respectively. Both the Cox clinical model and the DL clinical model showed excellent performances in the derivation [area under the curve (AUC): 0.75 vs. 0.77] and validation (AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.80) sets. The derived Cox genetic model with 6 significant prognostic genes was not as effective as the DL approach involving 686 genes. A combined clinical and genetic approach modified the performances of both the Cox and DL models. The integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index of the DL clinical model were generally better than those of the Cox clinical model. CONCLUSIONS: Our Cox clinical model sufficiently provided precise survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. It may serve as an accurate and cost-effective tool for predicting survival in such patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82461612021-07-14 Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches Dong, Wei Guo, Xinggang Liu, Fuchen Zhang, Wenli Wang, Zongyan Tian, Tao Tao, Qifei Hou, Guojun Zhou, Weiping Jeong, Seogsong Xia, Qiang Liu, Hui Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Precise prediction of survival after treatment is of great importance for patients with diseases with high mortality. RNA sequencing data and deep learning (DL) methods are expected to become promising approaches in the development of prediction models in the future. We aimed to evaluate the optimal covariates and methodology for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing surgical resection. METHODS: The Cox proportional hazards regression model and the DL approach were used to develop prediction models incorporating clinical, genetic, and combined clinical and genetic variables for survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. A total of 1,114 patients and 184 patients were enrolled in the present study from 2,163 and 601 patients from Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and Renji Hospital, respectively. The models were internally validated through random sampling and externally validated in clinical cohorts. Between-model comparisons were carried out in terms of the integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index. RESULTS: The Cox and DL clinical models were developed by adopting 7 independent prognostic factors (total bilirubin, prothrombin time, tumor size, tumor number, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion) and 22 clinical factors, respectively. Both the Cox clinical model and the DL clinical model showed excellent performances in the derivation [area under the curve (AUC): 0.75 vs. 0.77] and validation (AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.80) sets. The derived Cox genetic model with 6 significant prognostic genes was not as effective as the DL approach involving 686 genes. A combined clinical and genetic approach modified the performances of both the Cox and DL models. The integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index of the DL clinical model were generally better than those of the Cox clinical model. CONCLUSIONS: Our Cox clinical model sufficiently provided precise survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. It may serve as an accurate and cost-effective tool for predicting survival in such patients. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246161/ /pubmed/34268391 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4828 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dong, Wei
Guo, Xinggang
Liu, Fuchen
Zhang, Wenli
Wang, Zongyan
Tian, Tao
Tao, Qifei
Hou, Guojun
Zhou, Weiping
Jeong, Seogsong
Xia, Qiang
Liu, Hui
Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
title Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
title_full Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
title_fullStr Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
title_full_unstemmed Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
title_short Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
title_sort probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268391
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4828
work_keys_str_mv AT dongwei probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT guoxinggang probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT liufuchen probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT zhangwenli probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT wangzongyan probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT tiantao probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT taoqifei probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT houguojun probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT zhouweiping probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT jeongseogsong probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT xiaqiang probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches
AT liuhui probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches