Cargando…
Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches
BACKGROUND: Precise prediction of survival after treatment is of great importance for patients with diseases with high mortality. RNA sequencing data and deep learning (DL) methods are expected to become promising approaches in the development of prediction models in the future. We aimed to evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268391 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4828 |
_version_ | 1783716255136481280 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Wei Guo, Xinggang Liu, Fuchen Zhang, Wenli Wang, Zongyan Tian, Tao Tao, Qifei Hou, Guojun Zhou, Weiping Jeong, Seogsong Xia, Qiang Liu, Hui |
author_facet | Dong, Wei Guo, Xinggang Liu, Fuchen Zhang, Wenli Wang, Zongyan Tian, Tao Tao, Qifei Hou, Guojun Zhou, Weiping Jeong, Seogsong Xia, Qiang Liu, Hui |
author_sort | Dong, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Precise prediction of survival after treatment is of great importance for patients with diseases with high mortality. RNA sequencing data and deep learning (DL) methods are expected to become promising approaches in the development of prediction models in the future. We aimed to evaluate the optimal covariates and methodology for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing surgical resection. METHODS: The Cox proportional hazards regression model and the DL approach were used to develop prediction models incorporating clinical, genetic, and combined clinical and genetic variables for survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. A total of 1,114 patients and 184 patients were enrolled in the present study from 2,163 and 601 patients from Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and Renji Hospital, respectively. The models were internally validated through random sampling and externally validated in clinical cohorts. Between-model comparisons were carried out in terms of the integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index. RESULTS: The Cox and DL clinical models were developed by adopting 7 independent prognostic factors (total bilirubin, prothrombin time, tumor size, tumor number, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion) and 22 clinical factors, respectively. Both the Cox clinical model and the DL clinical model showed excellent performances in the derivation [area under the curve (AUC): 0.75 vs. 0.77] and validation (AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.80) sets. The derived Cox genetic model with 6 significant prognostic genes was not as effective as the DL approach involving 686 genes. A combined clinical and genetic approach modified the performances of both the Cox and DL models. The integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index of the DL clinical model were generally better than those of the Cox clinical model. CONCLUSIONS: Our Cox clinical model sufficiently provided precise survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. It may serve as an accurate and cost-effective tool for predicting survival in such patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8246161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82461612021-07-14 Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches Dong, Wei Guo, Xinggang Liu, Fuchen Zhang, Wenli Wang, Zongyan Tian, Tao Tao, Qifei Hou, Guojun Zhou, Weiping Jeong, Seogsong Xia, Qiang Liu, Hui Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Precise prediction of survival after treatment is of great importance for patients with diseases with high mortality. RNA sequencing data and deep learning (DL) methods are expected to become promising approaches in the development of prediction models in the future. We aimed to evaluate the optimal covariates and methodology for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing surgical resection. METHODS: The Cox proportional hazards regression model and the DL approach were used to develop prediction models incorporating clinical, genetic, and combined clinical and genetic variables for survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. A total of 1,114 patients and 184 patients were enrolled in the present study from 2,163 and 601 patients from Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and Renji Hospital, respectively. The models were internally validated through random sampling and externally validated in clinical cohorts. Between-model comparisons were carried out in terms of the integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index. RESULTS: The Cox and DL clinical models were developed by adopting 7 independent prognostic factors (total bilirubin, prothrombin time, tumor size, tumor number, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion) and 22 clinical factors, respectively. Both the Cox clinical model and the DL clinical model showed excellent performances in the derivation [area under the curve (AUC): 0.75 vs. 0.77] and validation (AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.80) sets. The derived Cox genetic model with 6 significant prognostic genes was not as effective as the DL approach involving 686 genes. A combined clinical and genetic approach modified the performances of both the Cox and DL models. The integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index of the DL clinical model were generally better than those of the Cox clinical model. CONCLUSIONS: Our Cox clinical model sufficiently provided precise survival prediction in patients with HCC after resection. It may serve as an accurate and cost-effective tool for predicting survival in such patients. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246161/ /pubmed/34268391 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4828 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dong, Wei Guo, Xinggang Liu, Fuchen Zhang, Wenli Wang, Zongyan Tian, Tao Tao, Qifei Hou, Guojun Zhou, Weiping Jeong, Seogsong Xia, Qiang Liu, Hui Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
title | Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
title_full | Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
title_fullStr | Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
title_short | Probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
title_sort | probabilistic ratiocination of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: evaluation of expected to be promising approaches |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268391 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongwei probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT guoxinggang probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT liufuchen probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT zhangwenli probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT wangzongyan probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT tiantao probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT taoqifei probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT houguojun probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT zhouweiping probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT jeongseogsong probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT xiaqiang probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches AT liuhui probabilisticratiocinationofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionevaluationofexpectedtobepromisingapproaches |