Cargando…

Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations

BACKGROUND: Demodex infestation is highly age-dependent. Intriguingly, our previous studies that focused on children and young adult patients suggested that the clinical features of young patients were different from those studies enrolling mainly elderly patients. Whether age plays a role between y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jing, Luo, Xiaohui, Liao, Yinglin, Liang, Lingyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268404
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7715
_version_ 1783716259929522176
author Li, Jing
Luo, Xiaohui
Liao, Yinglin
Liang, Lingyi
author_facet Li, Jing
Luo, Xiaohui
Liao, Yinglin
Liang, Lingyi
author_sort Li, Jing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Demodex infestation is highly age-dependent. Intriguingly, our previous studies that focused on children and young adult patients suggested that the clinical features of young patients were different from those studies enrolling mainly elderly patients. Whether age plays a role between young and elderly patients with ocular demodicosis remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective comparative study included 91 patients younger than 35 years and 92 older than 45 years with ocular demodicosis. Demodex mite count, symptoms, tear film, and ocular changes were compared between the two groups. Risk factors of meibomian gland loss (MGL) and corneal changes were analysed in the two groups. RESULTS: Demodex counts were comparable between the two groups. Young patients had higher D. brevis counts and overall percentage of D. brevis, while elderly patients had more D. folliculorum (all P<0.05). Irritation and blurred vision were more common in young patients, while eye fatigue and photophobia were more common in elderly patients (both P<0.05). The two groups had comparable tear volume and tear break-up time. Meibomian gland dysfunction was the most common sign in both groups but MGL was significantly more severe in young patients. More prevalent corneal changes and more eyelash disorders were found in young patients (both P<0.05). Female sex, a higher D. brevis percentage, lid margin anomalies, and MGL were associated with corneal change, while a higher D. brevis percentage and lid margin anomalies were related to MGL in young patients. MGL was associated with corneal change, but age was the only predictor of MGL in the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with ocular demodicosis tend to have more D. brevis infestation, more MGL, and more corneal involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82461812021-07-14 Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations Li, Jing Luo, Xiaohui Liao, Yinglin Liang, Lingyi Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Demodex infestation is highly age-dependent. Intriguingly, our previous studies that focused on children and young adult patients suggested that the clinical features of young patients were different from those studies enrolling mainly elderly patients. Whether age plays a role between young and elderly patients with ocular demodicosis remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective comparative study included 91 patients younger than 35 years and 92 older than 45 years with ocular demodicosis. Demodex mite count, symptoms, tear film, and ocular changes were compared between the two groups. Risk factors of meibomian gland loss (MGL) and corneal changes were analysed in the two groups. RESULTS: Demodex counts were comparable between the two groups. Young patients had higher D. brevis counts and overall percentage of D. brevis, while elderly patients had more D. folliculorum (all P<0.05). Irritation and blurred vision were more common in young patients, while eye fatigue and photophobia were more common in elderly patients (both P<0.05). The two groups had comparable tear volume and tear break-up time. Meibomian gland dysfunction was the most common sign in both groups but MGL was significantly more severe in young patients. More prevalent corneal changes and more eyelash disorders were found in young patients (both P<0.05). Female sex, a higher D. brevis percentage, lid margin anomalies, and MGL were associated with corneal change, while a higher D. brevis percentage and lid margin anomalies were related to MGL in young patients. MGL was associated with corneal change, but age was the only predictor of MGL in the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with ocular demodicosis tend to have more D. brevis infestation, more MGL, and more corneal involvement. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246181/ /pubmed/34268404 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7715 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Jing
Luo, Xiaohui
Liao, Yinglin
Liang, Lingyi
Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
title Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
title_full Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
title_fullStr Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
title_full_unstemmed Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
title_short Age differences in ocular demodicosis: Demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
title_sort age differences in ocular demodicosis: demodex profiles and clinical manifestations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268404
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7715
work_keys_str_mv AT lijing agedifferencesinoculardemodicosisdemodexprofilesandclinicalmanifestations
AT luoxiaohui agedifferencesinoculardemodicosisdemodexprofilesandclinicalmanifestations
AT liaoyinglin agedifferencesinoculardemodicosisdemodexprofilesandclinicalmanifestations
AT lianglingyi agedifferencesinoculardemodicosisdemodexprofilesandclinicalmanifestations