Cargando…
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review
OBJECTIVES: Online support can be a crucial source of support for individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours, with forum moderators being pivotal in terms of the role they play in times of personal mental health emergencies. This study identified what is empirically known about the professional pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047905 |
_version_ | 1783716300070060032 |
---|---|
author | Perry, Amanda Pyle, Denise Lamont-Mills, Andrea du Plessis, Carol du Preez, Jan |
author_facet | Perry, Amanda Pyle, Denise Lamont-Mills, Andrea du Plessis, Carol du Preez, Jan |
author_sort | Perry, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Online support can be a crucial source of support for individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours, with forum moderators being pivotal in terms of the role they play in times of personal mental health emergencies. This study identified what is empirically known about the professional practices of health professionals who are online mental health forum moderators and provide support to individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours. DESIGN: The Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien extension of the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework was used. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Psychology Collection (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Web of Science, Taylor and Francis Online, SAGE Journals and Science Direct databases were searched for articles that featured a result relating to an online forum; included participants who worked as online moderators or facilitators and focused on suicide or self-harm. Results were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1990 onwards. As a quality assurance measure, grey literature (nonacademic literature) was not included. Reference lists of included articles were hand-searched. RESULTS: There were 397 articles initially identified after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, with five articles included for synthesis. All articles received a moderate quality rating. Only one article featured a moderator who was a qualified health professional; the moderators in the remaining articles were volunteers who undertook preservice training. We found that there is little research that examines the professional working practices of online moderators who support individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The dearth of research focusing on the professional practices of online forum moderators is cause for concern given that individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours are increasingly turning to online forums when in crisis. Future research should focus on online moderators’ practice through interviewing moderators about their professional practices and by examining online moderator practice as it occurs in situ. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8246377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82463772021-07-13 Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review Perry, Amanda Pyle, Denise Lamont-Mills, Andrea du Plessis, Carol du Preez, Jan BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Online support can be a crucial source of support for individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours, with forum moderators being pivotal in terms of the role they play in times of personal mental health emergencies. This study identified what is empirically known about the professional practices of health professionals who are online mental health forum moderators and provide support to individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours. DESIGN: The Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien extension of the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework was used. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Psychology Collection (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Web of Science, Taylor and Francis Online, SAGE Journals and Science Direct databases were searched for articles that featured a result relating to an online forum; included participants who worked as online moderators or facilitators and focused on suicide or self-harm. Results were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1990 onwards. As a quality assurance measure, grey literature (nonacademic literature) was not included. Reference lists of included articles were hand-searched. RESULTS: There were 397 articles initially identified after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, with five articles included for synthesis. All articles received a moderate quality rating. Only one article featured a moderator who was a qualified health professional; the moderators in the remaining articles were volunteers who undertook preservice training. We found that there is little research that examines the professional working practices of online moderators who support individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The dearth of research focusing on the professional practices of online forum moderators is cause for concern given that individuals experiencing suicidal behaviours are increasingly turning to online forums when in crisis. Future research should focus on online moderators’ practice through interviewing moderators about their professional practices and by examining online moderator practice as it occurs in situ. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8246377/ /pubmed/34193497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047905 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Perry, Amanda Pyle, Denise Lamont-Mills, Andrea du Plessis, Carol du Preez, Jan Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
title | Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
title_full | Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
title_short | Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
title_sort | suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perryamanda suicidalbehavioursandmoderatorsupportinonlinehealthcommunitiesascopingreview AT pyledenise suicidalbehavioursandmoderatorsupportinonlinehealthcommunitiesascopingreview AT lamontmillsandrea suicidalbehavioursandmoderatorsupportinonlinehealthcommunitiesascopingreview AT duplessiscarol suicidalbehavioursandmoderatorsupportinonlinehealthcommunitiesascopingreview AT dupreezjan suicidalbehavioursandmoderatorsupportinonlinehealthcommunitiesascopingreview |