Cargando…

Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech

Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The intera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraus, Frauke, Tune, Sarah, Ruhe, Anna, Obleser, Jonas, Wöstmann, Malte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211013242
_version_ 1783716321650802688
author Kraus, Frauke
Tune, Sarah
Ruhe, Anna
Obleser, Jonas
Wöstmann, Malte
author_facet Kraus, Frauke
Tune, Sarah
Ruhe, Anna
Obleser, Jonas
Wöstmann, Malte
author_sort Kraus, Frauke
collection PubMed
description Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The interactive effects of unilateral acoustic degradation and spatial attention to one sound source in multitalker situations are at present unclear. Here, we simulated some features of listening with a unilateral CI in young, normal-hearing listeners (N = 22) who were presented with 8-band noise-vocoded speech to one ear and intact speech to the other ear. Neural responses were recorded in the electroencephalogram to obtain the spectrotemporal response function to speech. Listeners made more mistakes when answering questions about vocoded (vs. intact) attended speech. At the neural level, we asked how unilateral acoustic degradation would impact the attention-induced amplification of tracking target versus distracting speech. Interestingly, unilateral degradation did not per se reduce the attention-induced amplification but instead delayed it in time: Speech encoding accuracy, modelled on the basis of the spectrotemporal response function, was significantly enhanced for attended versus ignored intact speech at earlier neural response latencies (<∼250 ms). This attentional enhancement was not absent but delayed for vocoded speech. These findings suggest that attentional selection of unilateral, degraded speech is feasible but induces delayed neural separation of competing speech, which might explain listening challenges experienced by unilateral CI users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82464822021-07-13 Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech Kraus, Frauke Tune, Sarah Ruhe, Anna Obleser, Jonas Wöstmann, Malte Trends Hear Original Article Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The interactive effects of unilateral acoustic degradation and spatial attention to one sound source in multitalker situations are at present unclear. Here, we simulated some features of listening with a unilateral CI in young, normal-hearing listeners (N = 22) who were presented with 8-band noise-vocoded speech to one ear and intact speech to the other ear. Neural responses were recorded in the electroencephalogram to obtain the spectrotemporal response function to speech. Listeners made more mistakes when answering questions about vocoded (vs. intact) attended speech. At the neural level, we asked how unilateral acoustic degradation would impact the attention-induced amplification of tracking target versus distracting speech. Interestingly, unilateral degradation did not per se reduce the attention-induced amplification but instead delayed it in time: Speech encoding accuracy, modelled on the basis of the spectrotemporal response function, was significantly enhanced for attended versus ignored intact speech at earlier neural response latencies (<∼250 ms). This attentional enhancement was not absent but delayed for vocoded speech. These findings suggest that attentional selection of unilateral, degraded speech is feasible but induces delayed neural separation of competing speech, which might explain listening challenges experienced by unilateral CI users. SAGE Publications 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8246482/ /pubmed/34184964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211013242 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kraus, Frauke
Tune, Sarah
Ruhe, Anna
Obleser, Jonas
Wöstmann, Malte
Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
title Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
title_full Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
title_fullStr Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
title_short Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
title_sort unilateral acoustic degradation delays attentional separation of competing speech
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211013242
work_keys_str_mv AT krausfrauke unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech
AT tunesarah unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech
AT ruheanna unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech
AT obleserjonas unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech
AT wostmannmalte unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech