Cargando…
Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech
Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The intera...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211013242 |
_version_ | 1783716321650802688 |
---|---|
author | Kraus, Frauke Tune, Sarah Ruhe, Anna Obleser, Jonas Wöstmann, Malte |
author_facet | Kraus, Frauke Tune, Sarah Ruhe, Anna Obleser, Jonas Wöstmann, Malte |
author_sort | Kraus, Frauke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The interactive effects of unilateral acoustic degradation and spatial attention to one sound source in multitalker situations are at present unclear. Here, we simulated some features of listening with a unilateral CI in young, normal-hearing listeners (N = 22) who were presented with 8-band noise-vocoded speech to one ear and intact speech to the other ear. Neural responses were recorded in the electroencephalogram to obtain the spectrotemporal response function to speech. Listeners made more mistakes when answering questions about vocoded (vs. intact) attended speech. At the neural level, we asked how unilateral acoustic degradation would impact the attention-induced amplification of tracking target versus distracting speech. Interestingly, unilateral degradation did not per se reduce the attention-induced amplification but instead delayed it in time: Speech encoding accuracy, modelled on the basis of the spectrotemporal response function, was significantly enhanced for attended versus ignored intact speech at earlier neural response latencies (<∼250 ms). This attentional enhancement was not absent but delayed for vocoded speech. These findings suggest that attentional selection of unilateral, degraded speech is feasible but induces delayed neural separation of competing speech, which might explain listening challenges experienced by unilateral CI users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8246482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82464822021-07-13 Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech Kraus, Frauke Tune, Sarah Ruhe, Anna Obleser, Jonas Wöstmann, Malte Trends Hear Original Article Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The interactive effects of unilateral acoustic degradation and spatial attention to one sound source in multitalker situations are at present unclear. Here, we simulated some features of listening with a unilateral CI in young, normal-hearing listeners (N = 22) who were presented with 8-band noise-vocoded speech to one ear and intact speech to the other ear. Neural responses were recorded in the electroencephalogram to obtain the spectrotemporal response function to speech. Listeners made more mistakes when answering questions about vocoded (vs. intact) attended speech. At the neural level, we asked how unilateral acoustic degradation would impact the attention-induced amplification of tracking target versus distracting speech. Interestingly, unilateral degradation did not per se reduce the attention-induced amplification but instead delayed it in time: Speech encoding accuracy, modelled on the basis of the spectrotemporal response function, was significantly enhanced for attended versus ignored intact speech at earlier neural response latencies (<∼250 ms). This attentional enhancement was not absent but delayed for vocoded speech. These findings suggest that attentional selection of unilateral, degraded speech is feasible but induces delayed neural separation of competing speech, which might explain listening challenges experienced by unilateral CI users. SAGE Publications 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8246482/ /pubmed/34184964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211013242 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kraus, Frauke Tune, Sarah Ruhe, Anna Obleser, Jonas Wöstmann, Malte Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech |
title | Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech |
title_full | Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech |
title_fullStr | Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech |
title_full_unstemmed | Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech |
title_short | Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech |
title_sort | unilateral acoustic degradation delays attentional separation of competing speech |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211013242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausfrauke unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech AT tunesarah unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech AT ruheanna unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech AT obleserjonas unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech AT wostmannmalte unilateralacousticdegradationdelaysattentionalseparationofcompetingspeech |