Cargando…
Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience
BACKGROUND: The last procedure performed by the surgeon in laparoscopic surgery is to extract the specimen through the smallest incision possible. This experiment aimed to explore the maximum diameter of specimens that can be extracted through auxiliary incisions of different lengths and shapes by i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01300-5 |
_version_ | 1783716360254128128 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yuanbi Yi, Tian He, Huajie Li, Qiguang Long, Xian Hu, Gaohua Chen, Qiwei Li, Yongpeng Chen, Rongchao Yi, Xianlin |
author_facet | Huang, Yuanbi Yi, Tian He, Huajie Li, Qiguang Long, Xian Hu, Gaohua Chen, Qiwei Li, Yongpeng Chen, Rongchao Yi, Xianlin |
author_sort | Huang, Yuanbi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The last procedure performed by the surgeon in laparoscopic surgery is to extract the specimen through the smallest incision possible. This experiment aimed to explore the maximum diameter of specimens that can be extracted through auxiliary incisions of different lengths and shapes by in vitro physical experiments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the abdominal wall with the muscle layer, fixed on a square wooden frame, to simulate the human abdominal wall. Then, specimen extraction ports were made with circular, inverted Y-shaped and straight-line incisions of different sizes and lengths, and specimens of different sizes were made from tissues of different species. These specimens were extracted from different incisions with a force gauge. The tension value (N) was measured, and records were made of the length or diameter of the smallest auxiliary incision through which a given specimen could pass, as well as the largest specimen diameter that could pass through an incision of a given size. This experiment provides us with preliminary experience-based knowledge of how to choose the appropriate auxiliary incision for surgical specimen extraction according to the diameter of the specimen. RESULTS: The maximum diameters of specimens that could be extracted with circular ostomy diameters of 2.4, 2.7 and 3.3 cm were 4.0, 4.5 and 6.0 cm, respectively. Specimens with diameters of 6.0, 8.0 and 10.0 cm could be extracted through inverted Y-shaped incisions with a length around the umbilicus of 1 cm and an extension length of 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm, respectively. Moreover, these same specimens could be extracted through inverted Y-shaped incisions with a length around the umbilicus of 2 cm and extension lengths of 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 cm. Tough tissue specimens (made from chicken gizzards) with diameters of 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 6.0 cm, respectively, could be removed through straight-line incisions measuring 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 cm in length. CONCLUSION: Along with preoperative imaging, surgical planning and trocar position, the shape and length of auxiliary incisions can be used to improve the extraction of specimens via laparoscopic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01300-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8246676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82466762021-07-06 Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience Huang, Yuanbi Yi, Tian He, Huajie Li, Qiguang Long, Xian Hu, Gaohua Chen, Qiwei Li, Yongpeng Chen, Rongchao Yi, Xianlin BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: The last procedure performed by the surgeon in laparoscopic surgery is to extract the specimen through the smallest incision possible. This experiment aimed to explore the maximum diameter of specimens that can be extracted through auxiliary incisions of different lengths and shapes by in vitro physical experiments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the abdominal wall with the muscle layer, fixed on a square wooden frame, to simulate the human abdominal wall. Then, specimen extraction ports were made with circular, inverted Y-shaped and straight-line incisions of different sizes and lengths, and specimens of different sizes were made from tissues of different species. These specimens were extracted from different incisions with a force gauge. The tension value (N) was measured, and records were made of the length or diameter of the smallest auxiliary incision through which a given specimen could pass, as well as the largest specimen diameter that could pass through an incision of a given size. This experiment provides us with preliminary experience-based knowledge of how to choose the appropriate auxiliary incision for surgical specimen extraction according to the diameter of the specimen. RESULTS: The maximum diameters of specimens that could be extracted with circular ostomy diameters of 2.4, 2.7 and 3.3 cm were 4.0, 4.5 and 6.0 cm, respectively. Specimens with diameters of 6.0, 8.0 and 10.0 cm could be extracted through inverted Y-shaped incisions with a length around the umbilicus of 1 cm and an extension length of 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm, respectively. Moreover, these same specimens could be extracted through inverted Y-shaped incisions with a length around the umbilicus of 2 cm and extension lengths of 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 cm. Tough tissue specimens (made from chicken gizzards) with diameters of 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 6.0 cm, respectively, could be removed through straight-line incisions measuring 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 cm in length. CONCLUSION: Along with preoperative imaging, surgical planning and trocar position, the shape and length of auxiliary incisions can be used to improve the extraction of specimens via laparoscopic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01300-5. BioMed Central 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8246676/ /pubmed/34210315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01300-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Yuanbi Yi, Tian He, Huajie Li, Qiguang Long, Xian Hu, Gaohua Chen, Qiwei Li, Yongpeng Chen, Rongchao Yi, Xianlin Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
title | Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
title_full | Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
title_short | Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
title_sort | laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01300-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyuanbi laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT yitian laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT hehuajie laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT liqiguang laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT longxian laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT hugaohua laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT chenqiwei laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT liyongpeng laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT chenrongchao laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience AT yixianlin laparoscopicspecimenextractioninvitropreliminaryexperience |