Cargando…

Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios

Public opinion on the EU has received growing attention in the last decades, with an ever‐increasing number of studies examining various aspects of it. Surprisingly, most studies focus on attitudes towards the past and present of the EU, yet we know very little about public attitudes towards the fut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldberg, Andreas C., van Elsas, Erika J., De Vreese, Claes H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13057
_version_ 1783716380953018368
author Goldberg, Andreas C.
van Elsas, Erika J.
De Vreese, Claes H.
author_facet Goldberg, Andreas C.
van Elsas, Erika J.
De Vreese, Claes H.
author_sort Goldberg, Andreas C.
collection PubMed
description Public opinion on the EU has received growing attention in the last decades, with an ever‐increasing number of studies examining various aspects of it. Surprisingly, most studies focus on attitudes towards the past and present of the EU, yet we know very little about public attitudes towards the future of the EU. This study helps to fill this research gap by examining attitudes towards the EU's long‐term future using a novel approach. We developed eight concrete future EU scenarios based on an inductive analysis of qualitative survey data. Subsequently, respondents (in an independent survey) ranked their top three scenarios according to individual preferences. Using multidimensional unfolding, we show that these preferences form three clusters ordered along a more versus less EU dimension. In a second step, we used multinomial logistic regression to examine not only who supports which scenario (socio‐demographics) but also which EU attitudes lead to which future preferences. The analyses identify distinct characteristics and attitudes that drive people's preference for a given scenario. Overall, we find that factors such as occupational levels or left–right attitudes are strong determinants of preferences for the future of the EU, and that specific EU support (performance and utilitarian evaluations) is more important than diffuse EU support (identity and affect).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82467652021-07-02 Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios Goldberg, Andreas C. van Elsas, Erika J. De Vreese, Claes H. J Common Mark Stud Original Articles Public opinion on the EU has received growing attention in the last decades, with an ever‐increasing number of studies examining various aspects of it. Surprisingly, most studies focus on attitudes towards the past and present of the EU, yet we know very little about public attitudes towards the future of the EU. This study helps to fill this research gap by examining attitudes towards the EU's long‐term future using a novel approach. We developed eight concrete future EU scenarios based on an inductive analysis of qualitative survey data. Subsequently, respondents (in an independent survey) ranked their top three scenarios according to individual preferences. Using multidimensional unfolding, we show that these preferences form three clusters ordered along a more versus less EU dimension. In a second step, we used multinomial logistic regression to examine not only who supports which scenario (socio‐demographics) but also which EU attitudes lead to which future preferences. The analyses identify distinct characteristics and attitudes that drive people's preference for a given scenario. Overall, we find that factors such as occupational levels or left–right attitudes are strong determinants of preferences for the future of the EU, and that specific EU support (performance and utilitarian evaluations) is more important than diffuse EU support (identity and affect). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-22 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8246765/ /pubmed/34219803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13057 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies published by University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Goldberg, Andreas C.
van Elsas, Erika J.
De Vreese, Claes H.
Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios
title Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios
title_full Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios
title_fullStr Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios
title_short Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios
title_sort eurovisions: an exploration and explanation of public preferences for future eu scenarios
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13057
work_keys_str_mv AT goldbergandreasc eurovisionsanexplorationandexplanationofpublicpreferencesforfutureeuscenarios
AT vanelsaserikaj eurovisionsanexplorationandexplanationofpublicpreferencesforfutureeuscenarios
AT devreeseclaesh eurovisionsanexplorationandexplanationofpublicpreferencesforfutureeuscenarios