Cargando…

Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts

Recently, the dual beam Xe(+) plasma focused ion beam (Xe(+)pFIB) instrument has attracted increasing interest for site‐specific transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample preparation for a local region of interest as it shows several potential benefits compared to conventional Ga(+)FIB milling....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Xiangli, Wade, C. Austin, Withers, Philip J., Zhou, Xiaorong, Cai, Changrun, Haigh, Sarah J., Burke, M. Grace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33210738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12983
_version_ 1783716390706872320
author Zhong, Xiangli
Wade, C. Austin
Withers, Philip J.
Zhou, Xiaorong
Cai, Changrun
Haigh, Sarah J.
Burke, M. Grace
author_facet Zhong, Xiangli
Wade, C. Austin
Withers, Philip J.
Zhou, Xiaorong
Cai, Changrun
Haigh, Sarah J.
Burke, M. Grace
author_sort Zhong, Xiangli
collection PubMed
description Recently, the dual beam Xe(+) plasma focused ion beam (Xe(+)pFIB) instrument has attracted increasing interest for site‐specific transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample preparation for a local region of interest as it shows several potential benefits compared to conventional Ga(+)FIB milling. Nevertheless, challenges and questions remain especially in terms of FIB‐induced artefacts, which hinder reliable S/TEM microstructural and compositional analysis. Here we examine the efficacy of using Xe(+) pFIB as compared with conventional Ga(+) FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys. Three potential source of specimen preparation artefacts were examined, namely: (1) implantation‐induced defects such as amophisation, dislocations, or ‘bubble’ formation in the near‐surface region resulting from ion bombardment of the sample by the incident beam; (2) compositional artefacts due to implantation of the source ions and (3) material redeposition due to the milling process. It is shown that Xe(+)pFIB milling is able to produce improved STEM/TEM samples compared to those produced by Ga(+) milling, and is therefore the preferred specimen preparation route. Strategies for minimising the artefacts induced by Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB are also proposed. LAY DESCRIPTION: FIB (focused ion beam) instruments have become one of the most important systems in the preparation of site‐specific TEM specimens, which are typically 50‐100 nm in thickness. TEM specimen preparation of Al alloys is particularly challenging, as convention Ga‐ion FIB produces artefacts in these materials that make microstructural analysis difficult or impossible. Recently, the use of noble gas ion sources, such as Xe, has markedly improved milling speeds and is being used for the preparation of various materials. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the structural defects formed during FIB milling and assess the ion‐induced chemical contamination in these TEM samples. Here we explore the feasibility and efficiency of using Xe(+)PFIB as a TEM sample preparation route for Al alloys in comparison with the conventional Ga+FIB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82468172021-07-02 Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts Zhong, Xiangli Wade, C. Austin Withers, Philip J. Zhou, Xiaorong Cai, Changrun Haigh, Sarah J. Burke, M. Grace J Microsc Original Articles Recently, the dual beam Xe(+) plasma focused ion beam (Xe(+)pFIB) instrument has attracted increasing interest for site‐specific transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample preparation for a local region of interest as it shows several potential benefits compared to conventional Ga(+)FIB milling. Nevertheless, challenges and questions remain especially in terms of FIB‐induced artefacts, which hinder reliable S/TEM microstructural and compositional analysis. Here we examine the efficacy of using Xe(+) pFIB as compared with conventional Ga(+) FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys. Three potential source of specimen preparation artefacts were examined, namely: (1) implantation‐induced defects such as amophisation, dislocations, or ‘bubble’ formation in the near‐surface region resulting from ion bombardment of the sample by the incident beam; (2) compositional artefacts due to implantation of the source ions and (3) material redeposition due to the milling process. It is shown that Xe(+)pFIB milling is able to produce improved STEM/TEM samples compared to those produced by Ga(+) milling, and is therefore the preferred specimen preparation route. Strategies for minimising the artefacts induced by Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB are also proposed. LAY DESCRIPTION: FIB (focused ion beam) instruments have become one of the most important systems in the preparation of site‐specific TEM specimens, which are typically 50‐100 nm in thickness. TEM specimen preparation of Al alloys is particularly challenging, as convention Ga‐ion FIB produces artefacts in these materials that make microstructural analysis difficult or impossible. Recently, the use of noble gas ion sources, such as Xe, has markedly improved milling speeds and is being used for the preparation of various materials. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the structural defects formed during FIB milling and assess the ion‐induced chemical contamination in these TEM samples. Here we explore the feasibility and efficiency of using Xe(+)PFIB as a TEM sample preparation route for Al alloys in comparison with the conventional Ga+FIB. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-24 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246817/ /pubmed/33210738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12983 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Microscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Microscopical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhong, Xiangli
Wade, C. Austin
Withers, Philip J.
Zhou, Xiaorong
Cai, Changrun
Haigh, Sarah J.
Burke, M. Grace
Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts
title Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts
title_full Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts
title_fullStr Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts
title_short Comparing Xe(+)pFIB and Ga(+)FIB for TEM sample preparation of Al alloys: Minimising FIB‐induced artefacts
title_sort comparing xe(+)pfib and ga(+)fib for tem sample preparation of al alloys: minimising fib‐induced artefacts
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33210738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12983
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongxiangli comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts
AT wadecaustin comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts
AT withersphilipj comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts
AT zhouxiaorong comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts
AT caichangrun comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts
AT haighsarahj comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts
AT burkemgrace comparingxepfibandgafibfortemsamplepreparationofalalloysminimisingfibinducedartefacts