Cargando…

Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series

OBJECTIVE: There is mounting evidence that traumatic life events play a role in auditory hallucinations (AH). Theory suggests that some AH are decontextualized trauma memory intrusions. Exposure‐based trauma‐focused therapies that target trauma memory intrusions may therefore be a promising new trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brand, Rachel M., Bendall, Sarah, Hardy, Amy, Rossell, Susan L., Thomas, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papt.12284
_version_ 1783716395124523008
author Brand, Rachel M.
Bendall, Sarah
Hardy, Amy
Rossell, Susan L.
Thomas, Neil
author_facet Brand, Rachel M.
Bendall, Sarah
Hardy, Amy
Rossell, Susan L.
Thomas, Neil
author_sort Brand, Rachel M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is mounting evidence that traumatic life events play a role in auditory hallucinations (AH). Theory suggests that some AH are decontextualized trauma memory intrusions. Exposure‐based trauma‐focused therapies that target trauma memory intrusions may therefore be a promising new treatment. We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a standard protocol trauma‐focused imaginal exposure intervention for trauma‐related AH and to provide initial proof of concept regarding potential effects on AH. DESIGN: We conducted a single‐arm case series of a six session (90 min per session) imaginal exposure intervention for trauma‐related AH with assessments at baseline, post‐therapy, and one‐month follow‐up. RESULTS: Fifteen people were recruited and eligible to start the intervention. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction; however, temporary distress and symptom exacerbation were common and contributed to discontinuation. There was a large reduction in AH severity at one‐month follow‐up (adjusted d = 0.99), but individual response was highly variable. There were also large reductions in post‐traumatic stress disorder symptoms and the intrusiveness of the trauma memory. CONCLUSIONS: Imaginal exposure for trauma‐related AH is generally acceptable and may have large effects on AH severity for some people. However, temporary distress and symptom exacerbation are common and can lead to discontinuation. Low referral rates and uptake also suggest feasibility issues for standalone imaginal exposure for AH. The intervention may be more feasible and acceptable in the context of a broader trauma‐focused therapy. Well‐powered trials are needed to determine efficacy and factors that impact on acceptability and therapy response. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Some AH can be understood as trauma memory intrusions that lack temporal and spatial contextualization and are therefore experienced without autonoetic awareness. Imaginal exposure to trauma memories associated with AH may be an effective intervention for some people. Temporary distress and symptom exacerbation may be common when using standard trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for AH. This can impact on the acceptability of the therapy and should be considered in future development and delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82468452021-07-02 Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series Brand, Rachel M. Bendall, Sarah Hardy, Amy Rossell, Susan L. Thomas, Neil Psychol Psychother Research Papers OBJECTIVE: There is mounting evidence that traumatic life events play a role in auditory hallucinations (AH). Theory suggests that some AH are decontextualized trauma memory intrusions. Exposure‐based trauma‐focused therapies that target trauma memory intrusions may therefore be a promising new treatment. We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a standard protocol trauma‐focused imaginal exposure intervention for trauma‐related AH and to provide initial proof of concept regarding potential effects on AH. DESIGN: We conducted a single‐arm case series of a six session (90 min per session) imaginal exposure intervention for trauma‐related AH with assessments at baseline, post‐therapy, and one‐month follow‐up. RESULTS: Fifteen people were recruited and eligible to start the intervention. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction; however, temporary distress and symptom exacerbation were common and contributed to discontinuation. There was a large reduction in AH severity at one‐month follow‐up (adjusted d = 0.99), but individual response was highly variable. There were also large reductions in post‐traumatic stress disorder symptoms and the intrusiveness of the trauma memory. CONCLUSIONS: Imaginal exposure for trauma‐related AH is generally acceptable and may have large effects on AH severity for some people. However, temporary distress and symptom exacerbation are common and can lead to discontinuation. Low referral rates and uptake also suggest feasibility issues for standalone imaginal exposure for AH. The intervention may be more feasible and acceptable in the context of a broader trauma‐focused therapy. Well‐powered trials are needed to determine efficacy and factors that impact on acceptability and therapy response. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Some AH can be understood as trauma memory intrusions that lack temporal and spatial contextualization and are therefore experienced without autonoetic awareness. Imaginal exposure to trauma memories associated with AH may be an effective intervention for some people. Temporary distress and symptom exacerbation may be common when using standard trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for AH. This can impact on the acceptability of the therapy and should be considered in future development and delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-21 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8246845/ /pubmed/32436342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papt.12284 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Brand, Rachel M.
Bendall, Sarah
Hardy, Amy
Rossell, Susan L.
Thomas, Neil
Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series
title Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series
title_full Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series
title_fullStr Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series
title_full_unstemmed Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series
title_short Trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: A case series
title_sort trauma‐focused imaginal exposure for auditory hallucinations: a case series
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papt.12284
work_keys_str_mv AT brandrachelm traumafocusedimaginalexposureforauditoryhallucinationsacaseseries
AT bendallsarah traumafocusedimaginalexposureforauditoryhallucinationsacaseseries
AT hardyamy traumafocusedimaginalexposureforauditoryhallucinationsacaseseries
AT rossellsusanl traumafocusedimaginalexposureforauditoryhallucinationsacaseseries
AT thomasneil traumafocusedimaginalexposureforauditoryhallucinationsacaseseries