Cargando…
A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
BACKGROUND: Microbial biological control agents (MBCA) are biopesticides based on living microbes. They have huge potential for the control of pests and diseases, but have trouble reaching the European Union (EU) market. According to several authors, this is caused by the regulatory regime, which is...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5133 |
_version_ | 1783716395660345344 |
---|---|
author | Frederiks, Coen Wesseler, Justus HH |
author_facet | Frederiks, Coen Wesseler, Justus HH |
author_sort | Frederiks, Coen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microbial biological control agents (MBCA) are biopesticides based on living microbes. They have huge potential for the control of pests and diseases, but have trouble reaching the European Union (EU) market. According to several authors, this is caused by the regulatory regime, which is less supportive compared with that in the USA. The main objective of this paper is to present regulatory differences between the USA and the EU, and the resulting effects and developments of registration in both regions. RESULTS: Results show that EU registration is more complex due to differences between EU‐ and Member State (MS)‐level processes, large actor heterogeneity and low flexibility. As a result, EU registration takes, on average, ∼ 1.6 years longer than US registration. Regulatory amendments have improved EU‐level processes and led to a significant contraction of procedural time spans, but processes at the MS level have not improved and have become a larger procedural obstacle. CONCLUSION: The results correspond with the idea that EU registration is complex and lengthy compared with that in the USA. To improve regulation, national‐level processes should be targeted for amendment. To that end, the authors suggest various ways of expanding the registration capacity of MS. © 2018 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8246847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82468472021-07-02 A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents Frederiks, Coen Wesseler, Justus HH Pest Manag Sci Research Articles BACKGROUND: Microbial biological control agents (MBCA) are biopesticides based on living microbes. They have huge potential for the control of pests and diseases, but have trouble reaching the European Union (EU) market. According to several authors, this is caused by the regulatory regime, which is less supportive compared with that in the USA. The main objective of this paper is to present regulatory differences between the USA and the EU, and the resulting effects and developments of registration in both regions. RESULTS: Results show that EU registration is more complex due to differences between EU‐ and Member State (MS)‐level processes, large actor heterogeneity and low flexibility. As a result, EU registration takes, on average, ∼ 1.6 years longer than US registration. Regulatory amendments have improved EU‐level processes and led to a significant contraction of procedural time spans, but processes at the MS level have not improved and have become a larger procedural obstacle. CONCLUSION: The results correspond with the idea that EU registration is complex and lengthy compared with that in the USA. To improve regulation, national‐level processes should be targeted for amendment. To that end, the authors suggest various ways of expanding the registration capacity of MS. © 2018 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-08-27 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8246847/ /pubmed/29962019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5133 Text en Pest Management Science© 2018 The Authors Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Frederiks, Coen Wesseler, Justus HH A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
title | A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
title_full | A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
title_short | A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
title_sort | comparison of the eu and us regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frederikscoen acomparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents AT wesselerjustushh acomparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents AT frederikscoen comparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents AT wesselerjustushh comparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents |