Cargando…

A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents

BACKGROUND: Microbial biological control agents (MBCA) are biopesticides based on living microbes. They have huge potential for the control of pests and diseases, but have trouble reaching the European Union (EU) market. According to several authors, this is caused by the regulatory regime, which is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frederiks, Coen, Wesseler, Justus HH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5133
_version_ 1783716395660345344
author Frederiks, Coen
Wesseler, Justus HH
author_facet Frederiks, Coen
Wesseler, Justus HH
author_sort Frederiks, Coen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbial biological control agents (MBCA) are biopesticides based on living microbes. They have huge potential for the control of pests and diseases, but have trouble reaching the European Union (EU) market. According to several authors, this is caused by the regulatory regime, which is less supportive compared with that in the USA. The main objective of this paper is to present regulatory differences between the USA and the EU, and the resulting effects and developments of registration in both regions. RESULTS: Results show that EU registration is more complex due to differences between EU‐ and Member State (MS)‐level processes, large actor heterogeneity and low flexibility. As a result, EU registration takes, on average, ∼ 1.6 years longer than US registration. Regulatory amendments have improved EU‐level processes and led to a significant contraction of procedural time spans, but processes at the MS level have not improved and have become a larger procedural obstacle. CONCLUSION: The results correspond with the idea that EU registration is complex and lengthy compared with that in the USA. To improve regulation, national‐level processes should be targeted for amendment. To that end, the authors suggest various ways of expanding the registration capacity of MS. © 2018 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82468472021-07-02 A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents Frederiks, Coen Wesseler, Justus HH Pest Manag Sci Research Articles BACKGROUND: Microbial biological control agents (MBCA) are biopesticides based on living microbes. They have huge potential for the control of pests and diseases, but have trouble reaching the European Union (EU) market. According to several authors, this is caused by the regulatory regime, which is less supportive compared with that in the USA. The main objective of this paper is to present regulatory differences between the USA and the EU, and the resulting effects and developments of registration in both regions. RESULTS: Results show that EU registration is more complex due to differences between EU‐ and Member State (MS)‐level processes, large actor heterogeneity and low flexibility. As a result, EU registration takes, on average, ∼ 1.6 years longer than US registration. Regulatory amendments have improved EU‐level processes and led to a significant contraction of procedural time spans, but processes at the MS level have not improved and have become a larger procedural obstacle. CONCLUSION: The results correspond with the idea that EU registration is complex and lengthy compared with that in the USA. To improve regulation, national‐level processes should be targeted for amendment. To that end, the authors suggest various ways of expanding the registration capacity of MS. © 2018 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-08-27 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8246847/ /pubmed/29962019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5133 Text en Pest Management Science© 2018 The Authors Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Frederiks, Coen
Wesseler, Justus HH
A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
title A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
title_full A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
title_fullStr A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
title_short A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
title_sort comparison of the eu and us regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5133
work_keys_str_mv AT frederikscoen acomparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents
AT wesselerjustushh acomparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents
AT frederikscoen comparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents
AT wesselerjustushh comparisonoftheeuandusregulatoryframeworksfortheactivesubstanceregistrationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagents