Cargando…

Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: High‐risk neuroblastoma (HR‐NB) has a variable response to preoperative chemotherapy. It is not possible to differentiate viable vs. nonviable residual tumor before surgery. PURPOSE: To explore the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from diffusion‐weighted ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Privitera, Laura, Hales, Patrick W., Musleh, Layla, Morris, Elizabeth, Sizer, Natalie, Barone, Giuseppe, Humphries, Paul, Cross, Kate, Biassoni, Lorenzo, Giuliani, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27458
_version_ 1783716406257254400
author Privitera, Laura
Hales, Patrick W.
Musleh, Layla
Morris, Elizabeth
Sizer, Natalie
Barone, Giuseppe
Humphries, Paul
Cross, Kate
Biassoni, Lorenzo
Giuliani, Stefano
author_facet Privitera, Laura
Hales, Patrick W.
Musleh, Layla
Morris, Elizabeth
Sizer, Natalie
Barone, Giuseppe
Humphries, Paul
Cross, Kate
Biassoni, Lorenzo
Giuliani, Stefano
author_sort Privitera, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High‐risk neuroblastoma (HR‐NB) has a variable response to preoperative chemotherapy. It is not possible to differentiate viable vs. nonviable residual tumor before surgery. PURPOSE: To explore the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW‐MRI), (123)I‐meta‐iodobenzyl‐guanidine ((123)I‐mIBG) uptake, and histology before and after chemotherapy. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Forty patients with HR‐NB. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T axial DW‐MRI (b = 0,1000 s/mm(2)) and T(2)‐weighted sequences. (123)I‐mIBG scintigraphy planar imaging (all patients), with additional (123)I‐mIBG single‐photon emission computed tomography / computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging (15 patients). ASSESSMENT: ADC maps and (123)I‐mIBG SPECT/CT images were coregistered to the T(2)‐weighted images. (123)I‐mIBG uptake was normalized with a tumor‐to‐liver count ratio (TLCR). Regions of interest (ROIs) for primary tumor volume and different intratumor subregions were drawn. The lower quartile ADC value (ADC(25prc)) was used over the entire tumor volume and the overall level of (123)I‐mIBG uptake was graded into avidity groups. STATISTICAL TESTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression were used to compare ADC and MIBG values before and after treatment. Threshold values to classify tumors as viable/necrotic were obtained using ROC analysis of ADC and TLCR values. RESULTS: No significant difference in whole‐tumor ADC(25prc) values were found between different (123)I‐mIBG avidity groups pre‐ (P = 0.31) or postchemotherapy (P = 0.35). In the “intratumor” analysis, 5/15 patients (prechemotherapy) and 0/14 patients (postchemotherapy) showed a significant correlation between ADC and TLCR values (P < 0.05). Increased tumor shrinkage was associated with lower pretreatment tumor ADC(25prc) values (P < 0.001); no association was found with pretreatment (123)I‐mIBG avidity (P = 0.17). Completely nonviable tumors had significantly lower postchemotherapy ADC(25prc) values than tumors with >10% viable tumor (P < 0.05). Both pre‐ and posttreatment TLCR values were significantly higher in patients with >50% viable tumor than those with 10–50% viable tumor (P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: (123)I‐mIBG avidity and ADC values are complementary noninvasive biomarkers of therapeutic response in HR‐NB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82468922021-07-02 Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma Privitera, Laura Hales, Patrick W. Musleh, Layla Morris, Elizabeth Sizer, Natalie Barone, Giuseppe Humphries, Paul Cross, Kate Biassoni, Lorenzo Giuliani, Stefano J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: High‐risk neuroblastoma (HR‐NB) has a variable response to preoperative chemotherapy. It is not possible to differentiate viable vs. nonviable residual tumor before surgery. PURPOSE: To explore the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW‐MRI), (123)I‐meta‐iodobenzyl‐guanidine ((123)I‐mIBG) uptake, and histology before and after chemotherapy. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Forty patients with HR‐NB. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T axial DW‐MRI (b = 0,1000 s/mm(2)) and T(2)‐weighted sequences. (123)I‐mIBG scintigraphy planar imaging (all patients), with additional (123)I‐mIBG single‐photon emission computed tomography / computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging (15 patients). ASSESSMENT: ADC maps and (123)I‐mIBG SPECT/CT images were coregistered to the T(2)‐weighted images. (123)I‐mIBG uptake was normalized with a tumor‐to‐liver count ratio (TLCR). Regions of interest (ROIs) for primary tumor volume and different intratumor subregions were drawn. The lower quartile ADC value (ADC(25prc)) was used over the entire tumor volume and the overall level of (123)I‐mIBG uptake was graded into avidity groups. STATISTICAL TESTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression were used to compare ADC and MIBG values before and after treatment. Threshold values to classify tumors as viable/necrotic were obtained using ROC analysis of ADC and TLCR values. RESULTS: No significant difference in whole‐tumor ADC(25prc) values were found between different (123)I‐mIBG avidity groups pre‐ (P = 0.31) or postchemotherapy (P = 0.35). In the “intratumor” analysis, 5/15 patients (prechemotherapy) and 0/14 patients (postchemotherapy) showed a significant correlation between ADC and TLCR values (P < 0.05). Increased tumor shrinkage was associated with lower pretreatment tumor ADC(25prc) values (P < 0.001); no association was found with pretreatment (123)I‐mIBG avidity (P = 0.17). Completely nonviable tumors had significantly lower postchemotherapy ADC(25prc) values than tumors with >10% viable tumor (P < 0.05). Both pre‐ and posttreatment TLCR values were significantly higher in patients with >50% viable tumor than those with 10–50% viable tumor (P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: (123)I‐mIBG avidity and ADC values are complementary noninvasive biomarkers of therapeutic response in HR‐NB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-12-06 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246892/ /pubmed/33283381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27458 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Privitera, Laura
Hales, Patrick W.
Musleh, Layla
Morris, Elizabeth
Sizer, Natalie
Barone, Giuseppe
Humphries, Paul
Cross, Kate
Biassoni, Lorenzo
Giuliani, Stefano
Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma
title Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma
title_full Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma
title_fullStr Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma
title_short Comparison Between Diffusion‐Weighted MRI and (123)I‐mIBG Uptake in Primary High‐Risk Neuroblastoma
title_sort comparison between diffusion‐weighted mri and (123)i‐mibg uptake in primary high‐risk neuroblastoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27458
work_keys_str_mv AT priviteralaura comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT halespatrickw comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT muslehlayla comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT morriselizabeth comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT sizernatalie comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT baronegiuseppe comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT humphriespaul comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT crosskate comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT biassonilorenzo comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma
AT giulianistefano comparisonbetweendiffusionweightedmriand123imibguptakeinprimaryhighriskneuroblastoma