Cargando…
Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital. METHODS: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13493 |
_version_ | 1783716414415175680 |
---|---|
author | van der Meij, Elleke Herklots, Tanneke Yussuf, Suhaila Meguid, Tarek Franx, Arie Payne, Beth A. Jacod, Benoit |
author_facet | van der Meij, Elleke Herklots, Tanneke Yussuf, Suhaila Meguid, Tarek Franx, Arie Payne, Beth A. Jacod, Benoit |
author_sort | van der Meij, Elleke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital. METHODS: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of miniPIERS by examining measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratification accuracy. The secondary outcome was the applicability of miniPIERS within the referral hospital setting. RESULTS: During this period, 2218 of 13 395 (21%) patients were identified with HDP, of whom 594 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty per cent of patients with adverse outcomes were excluded because they had experienced one of the adverse outcomes before admission. The discriminative ability of miniPIERS was inaccurate. It was not likely to aid risk stratification because of low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The model showed fair discrimination in HDP before 34 weeks of gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63–0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of miniPIERS appeared to be limited, although clinical conditions make any validation challenging. Its application for risk stratification in preterm pregnancies should be further investigated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8246929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82469292021-07-02 Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar van der Meij, Elleke Herklots, Tanneke Yussuf, Suhaila Meguid, Tarek Franx, Arie Payne, Beth A. Jacod, Benoit Int J Gynaecol Obstet Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital. METHODS: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of miniPIERS by examining measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratification accuracy. The secondary outcome was the applicability of miniPIERS within the referral hospital setting. RESULTS: During this period, 2218 of 13 395 (21%) patients were identified with HDP, of whom 594 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty per cent of patients with adverse outcomes were excluded because they had experienced one of the adverse outcomes before admission. The discriminative ability of miniPIERS was inaccurate. It was not likely to aid risk stratification because of low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The model showed fair discrimination in HDP before 34 weeks of gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63–0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of miniPIERS appeared to be limited, although clinical conditions make any validation challenging. Its application for risk stratification in preterm pregnancies should be further investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-22 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246929/ /pubmed/33222177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13493 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Articles van der Meij, Elleke Herklots, Tanneke Yussuf, Suhaila Meguid, Tarek Franx, Arie Payne, Beth A. Jacod, Benoit Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar |
title | Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar |
title_full | Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar |
title_fullStr | Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar |
title_short | Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar |
title_sort | retrospective validation study of minipiers prediction model in zanzibar |
topic | Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandermeijelleke retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar AT herklotstanneke retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar AT yussufsuhaila retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar AT meguidtarek retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar AT franxarie retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar AT paynebetha retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar AT jacodbenoit retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar |