Cargando…

Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar

OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital. METHODS: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Meij, Elleke, Herklots, Tanneke, Yussuf, Suhaila, Meguid, Tarek, Franx, Arie, Payne, Beth A., Jacod, Benoit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13493
_version_ 1783716414415175680
author van der Meij, Elleke
Herklots, Tanneke
Yussuf, Suhaila
Meguid, Tarek
Franx, Arie
Payne, Beth A.
Jacod, Benoit
author_facet van der Meij, Elleke
Herklots, Tanneke
Yussuf, Suhaila
Meguid, Tarek
Franx, Arie
Payne, Beth A.
Jacod, Benoit
author_sort van der Meij, Elleke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital. METHODS: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of miniPIERS by examining measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratification accuracy. The secondary outcome was the applicability of miniPIERS within the referral hospital setting. RESULTS: During this period, 2218 of 13 395 (21%) patients were identified with HDP, of whom 594 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty per cent of patients with adverse outcomes were excluded because they had experienced one of the adverse outcomes before admission. The discriminative ability of miniPIERS was inaccurate. It was not likely to aid risk stratification because of low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The model showed fair discrimination in HDP before 34 weeks of gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63–0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of miniPIERS appeared to be limited, although clinical conditions make any validation challenging. Its application for risk stratification in preterm pregnancies should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8246929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82469292021-07-02 Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar van der Meij, Elleke Herklots, Tanneke Yussuf, Suhaila Meguid, Tarek Franx, Arie Payne, Beth A. Jacod, Benoit Int J Gynaecol Obstet Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital. METHODS: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of miniPIERS by examining measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratification accuracy. The secondary outcome was the applicability of miniPIERS within the referral hospital setting. RESULTS: During this period, 2218 of 13 395 (21%) patients were identified with HDP, of whom 594 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty per cent of patients with adverse outcomes were excluded because they had experienced one of the adverse outcomes before admission. The discriminative ability of miniPIERS was inaccurate. It was not likely to aid risk stratification because of low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The model showed fair discrimination in HDP before 34 weeks of gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63–0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of miniPIERS appeared to be limited, although clinical conditions make any validation challenging. Its application for risk stratification in preterm pregnancies should be further investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-22 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8246929/ /pubmed/33222177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13493 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
van der Meij, Elleke
Herklots, Tanneke
Yussuf, Suhaila
Meguid, Tarek
Franx, Arie
Payne, Beth A.
Jacod, Benoit
Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
title Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
title_full Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
title_fullStr Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
title_short Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
title_sort retrospective validation study of minipiers prediction model in zanzibar
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13493
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermeijelleke retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar
AT herklotstanneke retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar
AT yussufsuhaila retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar
AT meguidtarek retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar
AT franxarie retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar
AT paynebetha retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar
AT jacodbenoit retrospectivevalidationstudyofminipierspredictionmodelinzanzibar