Cargando…

Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the agreement between a new rebound tonometer, IC200, and IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. We measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 145 eyes of 145 glaucoma patients in the sitting posit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakakura, Shunsuke, Asaoka, Ryo, Terao, Etsuko, Nagata, Yuki, Fukuma, Yasuko, Oogi, Satomi, Shiraishi, Miku, Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z
_version_ 1783716466492702720
author Nakakura, Shunsuke
Asaoka, Ryo
Terao, Etsuko
Nagata, Yuki
Fukuma, Yasuko
Oogi, Satomi
Shiraishi, Miku
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
author_facet Nakakura, Shunsuke
Asaoka, Ryo
Terao, Etsuko
Nagata, Yuki
Fukuma, Yasuko
Oogi, Satomi
Shiraishi, Miku
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
author_sort Nakakura, Shunsuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated the agreement between a new rebound tonometer, IC200, and IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. We measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 145 eyes of 145 glaucoma patients in the sitting position using GAT, IcarePRO, and IC200. IcarePRO and IC200 measurements were also obtained in the supine position. IC200 measurement was performed using two modes: single six (IC200-single) and automatic (IC200-continuous) six-measurements mode. RESULTS: All tonometers provided high reproducibility in both positions (all intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90), although it was highest with GAT, followed by IC200-continuous and IC200-single and then IcarePRO. In the sitting position, the mean (± SD) IOPs of GAT, IcarePRO, IC200-single, and IC200-continuous were 14.5 ± 2.9 mmHg, 13.3 ± 3.2 mmHg, 11.6 ± 3.2 mmHg, and 11.5 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively. IOPs measured with IcarePRO or IC200 were significantly lower than those with GAT, particularly in patients with low IOP. IOPs measured with all tonometers were significantly elevated in the supine position as compared with the sitting position, but this difference was significantly greater with IC200-single and IC200-continuous compared with IcarePRO. IOP elevation was significant in eyes without bleb versus those with bleb, but this finding was not observed when IOP was measured with IcarePRO. The IOPs of the single and continuous modes of IC200 were interchangeable in both positions. CONCLUSIONS: GAT, IcarePRO, and IC200 had sufficiently high reproducibility, but measurements with IcarePRO may not be accurate in the supine position. Elevation of IOP in the supine position, especially in eyes with bleb, was more sensitively captured with IC200 than with IcarePRO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Clinical Trials Register, No. UMIN000039982. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82471772021-07-06 Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma Nakakura, Shunsuke Asaoka, Ryo Terao, Etsuko Nagata, Yuki Fukuma, Yasuko Oogi, Satomi Shiraishi, Miku Kiuchi, Yoshiaki Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated the agreement between a new rebound tonometer, IC200, and IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. We measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 145 eyes of 145 glaucoma patients in the sitting position using GAT, IcarePRO, and IC200. IcarePRO and IC200 measurements were also obtained in the supine position. IC200 measurement was performed using two modes: single six (IC200-single) and automatic (IC200-continuous) six-measurements mode. RESULTS: All tonometers provided high reproducibility in both positions (all intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90), although it was highest with GAT, followed by IC200-continuous and IC200-single and then IcarePRO. In the sitting position, the mean (± SD) IOPs of GAT, IcarePRO, IC200-single, and IC200-continuous were 14.5 ± 2.9 mmHg, 13.3 ± 3.2 mmHg, 11.6 ± 3.2 mmHg, and 11.5 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively. IOPs measured with IcarePRO or IC200 were significantly lower than those with GAT, particularly in patients with low IOP. IOPs measured with all tonometers were significantly elevated in the supine position as compared with the sitting position, but this difference was significantly greater with IC200-single and IC200-continuous compared with IcarePRO. IOP elevation was significant in eyes without bleb versus those with bleb, but this finding was not observed when IOP was measured with IcarePRO. The IOPs of the single and continuous modes of IC200 were interchangeable in both positions. CONCLUSIONS: GAT, IcarePRO, and IC200 had sufficiently high reproducibility, but measurements with IcarePRO may not be accurate in the supine position. Elevation of IOP in the supine position, especially in eyes with bleb, was more sensitively captured with IC200 than with IcarePRO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Clinical Trials Register, No. UMIN000039982. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z. BioMed Central 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8247177/ /pubmed/34193284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nakakura, Shunsuke
Asaoka, Ryo
Terao, Etsuko
Nagata, Yuki
Fukuma, Yasuko
Oogi, Satomi
Shiraishi, Miku
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
title Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
title_full Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
title_fullStr Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
title_short Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
title_sort evaluation of rebound tonometer icare ic200 as compared with icarepro and goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34193284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z
work_keys_str_mv AT nakakurashunsuke evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT asaokaryo evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT teraoetsuko evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT nagatayuki evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT fukumayasuko evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT oogisatomi evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT shiraishimiku evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma
AT kiuchiyoshiaki evaluationofreboundtonometericareic200ascomparedwithicareproandgoldmannapplanationtonometerinpatientswithglaucoma