Cargando…

Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation

BACKGROUND: Although effective treatments are available to address the cognitive deficits experienced by individuals with first-episode psychosis, provision of such treatments within Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs is rare. One factor that may contribute to this is uncertainty about the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breitborde, Nicholas J. K., Bell, Emily K., Woolverton, Cindy, Pine, Jacob G., Waslter, Heather, Moe, Aubrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00292-6
_version_ 1783716466732826624
author Breitborde, Nicholas J. K.
Bell, Emily K.
Woolverton, Cindy
Pine, Jacob G.
Waslter, Heather
Moe, Aubrey M.
author_facet Breitborde, Nicholas J. K.
Bell, Emily K.
Woolverton, Cindy
Pine, Jacob G.
Waslter, Heather
Moe, Aubrey M.
author_sort Breitborde, Nicholas J. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although effective treatments are available to address the cognitive deficits experienced by individuals with first-episode psychosis, provision of such treatments within Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs is rare. One factor that may contribute to this is uncertainty about the cost implications of providing cognitive-enhancing treatments within the American mental healthcare system. The aim of this study is to complete a naturalistic evaluation of the cost utility of incorporating two different cognitive-enhancing interventions within an American CSC program. METHODS: Participants included 66, predominately white (75.38%), individuals with first-episode psychosis (19 women and 47 men) with a mean age of 22.71 years. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost of care were tracked among these individuals during their participation in a CSC program. These data were compared among three groups of participants during their first six months of care: (i) individuals who participated in metacognitive remediation therapy (MCR), (ii) individuals who participated in computerized cognitive remediation (CCR), and (iii) individuals who participated in no cognitive-enhancing intervention. RESULTS: Participation in MCR, but not CCR, was associated with larger gains in QALYs than participation in no cognitive-enhancing intervention within a CSC program. Moreover, data support the cost utility of MCR as compared to CCR or no-cognitive enhancing intervention within a CSC program. Conversely, CCR did not appear to be a cost-effective addition to CSC services. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential cost utility of incorporating MCR within CSC programs for individuals with first-episode psychosis. However, given study limitations, these results should be interpreted cautiously until replicated by large, randomized controlled trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01570972, registered April 4, 2012, Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01570972?term=breitborde&draw=2&rank=6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82471782021-07-06 Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation Breitborde, Nicholas J. K. Bell, Emily K. Woolverton, Cindy Pine, Jacob G. Waslter, Heather Moe, Aubrey M. Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Although effective treatments are available to address the cognitive deficits experienced by individuals with first-episode psychosis, provision of such treatments within Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs is rare. One factor that may contribute to this is uncertainty about the cost implications of providing cognitive-enhancing treatments within the American mental healthcare system. The aim of this study is to complete a naturalistic evaluation of the cost utility of incorporating two different cognitive-enhancing interventions within an American CSC program. METHODS: Participants included 66, predominately white (75.38%), individuals with first-episode psychosis (19 women and 47 men) with a mean age of 22.71 years. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost of care were tracked among these individuals during their participation in a CSC program. These data were compared among three groups of participants during their first six months of care: (i) individuals who participated in metacognitive remediation therapy (MCR), (ii) individuals who participated in computerized cognitive remediation (CCR), and (iii) individuals who participated in no cognitive-enhancing intervention. RESULTS: Participation in MCR, but not CCR, was associated with larger gains in QALYs than participation in no cognitive-enhancing intervention within a CSC program. Moreover, data support the cost utility of MCR as compared to CCR or no-cognitive enhancing intervention within a CSC program. Conversely, CCR did not appear to be a cost-effective addition to CSC services. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential cost utility of incorporating MCR within CSC programs for individuals with first-episode psychosis. However, given study limitations, these results should be interpreted cautiously until replicated by large, randomized controlled trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01570972, registered April 4, 2012, Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01570972?term=breitborde&draw=2&rank=6. BioMed Central 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8247178/ /pubmed/34210341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00292-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Breitborde, Nicholas J. K.
Bell, Emily K.
Woolverton, Cindy
Pine, Jacob G.
Waslter, Heather
Moe, Aubrey M.
Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
title Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
title_full Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
title_fullStr Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
title_short Cost Utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
title_sort cost utility of cognition-enhancing interventions for individuals with first-episode psychosis: a naturalistic evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00292-6
work_keys_str_mv AT breitbordenicholasjk costutilityofcognitionenhancinginterventionsforindividualswithfirstepisodepsychosisanaturalisticevaluation
AT bellemilyk costutilityofcognitionenhancinginterventionsforindividualswithfirstepisodepsychosisanaturalisticevaluation
AT woolvertoncindy costutilityofcognitionenhancinginterventionsforindividualswithfirstepisodepsychosisanaturalisticevaluation
AT pinejacobg costutilityofcognitionenhancinginterventionsforindividualswithfirstepisodepsychosisanaturalisticevaluation
AT waslterheather costutilityofcognitionenhancinginterventionsforindividualswithfirstepisodepsychosisanaturalisticevaluation
AT moeaubreym costutilityofcognitionenhancinginterventionsforindividualswithfirstepisodepsychosisanaturalisticevaluation