Cargando…

Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured search strategy consisting of “metagenomics”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ya, Qi, Yinliang, Lo, Edward C. M., McGrath, Colman, Mei, May Lei, Dai, Ruoxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13405
_version_ 1783716485119606784
author Zhang, Ya
Qi, Yinliang
Lo, Edward C. M.
McGrath, Colman
Mei, May Lei
Dai, Ruoxi
author_facet Zhang, Ya
Qi, Yinliang
Lo, Edward C. M.
McGrath, Colman
Mei, May Lei
Dai, Ruoxi
author_sort Zhang, Ya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured search strategy consisting of “metagenomics” and “oral diseases” was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify effective papers. The included studies were original studies published in English, using metagenomic approach to analyze the effectiveness of periodontal intervention on oral microbiome among systematically healthy human subjects with periodontitis. RESULTS: A total of 12 papers were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of selected study, quantitative analysis was not performed. The findings as to how alpha diversity changed after interventions were not consistent across studies. Six studies illustrated clear separation of microbial composition between dental plaque samples collected before and after intervention using principal coordinates/component analysis. The most commonly detected genera before intervention were Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella, and Prevotella, while Streptococcus and Actinomyces usually increased and became the dominant genera after intervention. Correlation network analysis revealed that after intervention, the topology of network was different compared to the corresponding pre‐interventional samples. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence of metagenomic studies depicts a complex change in oral microbiome after periodontal intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82472662021-07-02 Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review Zhang, Ya Qi, Yinliang Lo, Edward C. M. McGrath, Colman Mei, May Lei Dai, Ruoxi Oral Dis Review Articles OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured search strategy consisting of “metagenomics” and “oral diseases” was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify effective papers. The included studies were original studies published in English, using metagenomic approach to analyze the effectiveness of periodontal intervention on oral microbiome among systematically healthy human subjects with periodontitis. RESULTS: A total of 12 papers were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of selected study, quantitative analysis was not performed. The findings as to how alpha diversity changed after interventions were not consistent across studies. Six studies illustrated clear separation of microbial composition between dental plaque samples collected before and after intervention using principal coordinates/component analysis. The most commonly detected genera before intervention were Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella, and Prevotella, while Streptococcus and Actinomyces usually increased and became the dominant genera after intervention. Correlation network analysis revealed that after intervention, the topology of network was different compared to the corresponding pre‐interventional samples. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence of metagenomic studies depicts a complex change in oral microbiome after periodontal intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-26 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8247266/ /pubmed/32390250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13405 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Zhang, Ya
Qi, Yinliang
Lo, Edward C. M.
McGrath, Colman
Mei, May Lei
Dai, Ruoxi
Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
title Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
title_full Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
title_fullStr Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
title_short Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
title_sort using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13405
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangya usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT qiyinliang usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT loedwardcm usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT mcgrathcolman usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT meimaylei usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT dairuoxi usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview