Cargando…
Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured search strategy consisting of “metagenomics”...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13405 |
_version_ | 1783716485119606784 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ya Qi, Yinliang Lo, Edward C. M. McGrath, Colman Mei, May Lei Dai, Ruoxi |
author_facet | Zhang, Ya Qi, Yinliang Lo, Edward C. M. McGrath, Colman Mei, May Lei Dai, Ruoxi |
author_sort | Zhang, Ya |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured search strategy consisting of “metagenomics” and “oral diseases” was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify effective papers. The included studies were original studies published in English, using metagenomic approach to analyze the effectiveness of periodontal intervention on oral microbiome among systematically healthy human subjects with periodontitis. RESULTS: A total of 12 papers were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of selected study, quantitative analysis was not performed. The findings as to how alpha diversity changed after interventions were not consistent across studies. Six studies illustrated clear separation of microbial composition between dental plaque samples collected before and after intervention using principal coordinates/component analysis. The most commonly detected genera before intervention were Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella, and Prevotella, while Streptococcus and Actinomyces usually increased and became the dominant genera after intervention. Correlation network analysis revealed that after intervention, the topology of network was different compared to the corresponding pre‐interventional samples. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence of metagenomic studies depicts a complex change in oral microbiome after periodontal intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82472662021-07-02 Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review Zhang, Ya Qi, Yinliang Lo, Edward C. M. McGrath, Colman Mei, May Lei Dai, Ruoxi Oral Dis Review Articles OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured search strategy consisting of “metagenomics” and “oral diseases” was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify effective papers. The included studies were original studies published in English, using metagenomic approach to analyze the effectiveness of periodontal intervention on oral microbiome among systematically healthy human subjects with periodontitis. RESULTS: A total of 12 papers were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of selected study, quantitative analysis was not performed. The findings as to how alpha diversity changed after interventions were not consistent across studies. Six studies illustrated clear separation of microbial composition between dental plaque samples collected before and after intervention using principal coordinates/component analysis. The most commonly detected genera before intervention were Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella, and Prevotella, while Streptococcus and Actinomyces usually increased and became the dominant genera after intervention. Correlation network analysis revealed that after intervention, the topology of network was different compared to the corresponding pre‐interventional samples. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence of metagenomic studies depicts a complex change in oral microbiome after periodontal intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-26 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8247266/ /pubmed/32390250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13405 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Zhang, Ya Qi, Yinliang Lo, Edward C. M. McGrath, Colman Mei, May Lei Dai, Ruoxi Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review |
title | Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review |
title_full | Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review |
title_short | Using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review |
title_sort | using next‐generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: a systematic review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangya usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview AT qiyinliang usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview AT loedwardcm usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview AT mcgrathcolman usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview AT meimaylei usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview AT dairuoxi usingnextgenerationsequencingtodetectoralmicrobiomechangefollowingperiodontalinterventionsasystematicreview |