Cargando…
Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices
Driveline infections (DLI) are common adverse events in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), leading to severe complications and readmissions. The study aims to characterize risk factors for DLI readmission 2 years postimplant. This single‐center study included 183 LVAD patients (43 HeartMate II...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33052592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.13843 |
_version_ | 1783716493223002112 |
---|---|
author | Schlöglhofer, Thomas Michalovics, Peter Riebandt, Julia Angleitner, Philipp Stoiber, Martin Laufer, Günther Schima, Heinrich Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Moscato, Francesco |
author_facet | Schlöglhofer, Thomas Michalovics, Peter Riebandt, Julia Angleitner, Philipp Stoiber, Martin Laufer, Günther Schima, Heinrich Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Moscato, Francesco |
author_sort | Schlöglhofer, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Driveline infections (DLI) are common adverse events in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), leading to severe complications and readmissions. The study aims to characterize risk factors for DLI readmission 2 years postimplant. This single‐center study included 183 LVAD patients (43 HeartMate II [HMII], 29 HeartMate 3 [HM3], 111 HVAD) following hospital discharge between 2013 and 2017. Demographics, clinical parameters, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed and 12.6% of patients were readmitted for DLI, 14.8% experienced DLI but were treated in the outpatient setting, and 72.7% had no DLI. Mean C‐reactive protein (CRP), leukocytes and fibrinogen were higher in patients with DLI readmission (P < .02) than in outpatient DLI and patients without DLI, as early as 60 days before readmission. Freedom from DLI readmission was comparable for HMII and HVAD (98% vs. 87%; HR, 4.52; 95% CI, 0.58‐35.02; P = .15) but significantly lower for HM3 (72%; HR, 10.82; 95% CI, 1.26‐92.68; P = .03). DLI (HR, 1.001; 95% CI, 0.999‐1.002; P = .16) or device type had no effect on mortality. DLI readmission remains a serious problem following LVAD implantation, where CRP, leukocytes, and fibrinogen might serve as risk factors already 60 days before. HM3 patients had a higher risk for DLI readmissions compared to HVAD or HMII, possibly because of device‐specific driveline differences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82473012021-07-02 Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices Schlöglhofer, Thomas Michalovics, Peter Riebandt, Julia Angleitner, Philipp Stoiber, Martin Laufer, Günther Schima, Heinrich Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Moscato, Francesco Artif Organs Main Text Articles Driveline infections (DLI) are common adverse events in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), leading to severe complications and readmissions. The study aims to characterize risk factors for DLI readmission 2 years postimplant. This single‐center study included 183 LVAD patients (43 HeartMate II [HMII], 29 HeartMate 3 [HM3], 111 HVAD) following hospital discharge between 2013 and 2017. Demographics, clinical parameters, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed and 12.6% of patients were readmitted for DLI, 14.8% experienced DLI but were treated in the outpatient setting, and 72.7% had no DLI. Mean C‐reactive protein (CRP), leukocytes and fibrinogen were higher in patients with DLI readmission (P < .02) than in outpatient DLI and patients without DLI, as early as 60 days before readmission. Freedom from DLI readmission was comparable for HMII and HVAD (98% vs. 87%; HR, 4.52; 95% CI, 0.58‐35.02; P = .15) but significantly lower for HM3 (72%; HR, 10.82; 95% CI, 1.26‐92.68; P = .03). DLI (HR, 1.001; 95% CI, 0.999‐1.002; P = .16) or device type had no effect on mortality. DLI readmission remains a serious problem following LVAD implantation, where CRP, leukocytes, and fibrinogen might serve as risk factors already 60 days before. HM3 patients had a higher risk for DLI readmissions compared to HVAD or HMII, possibly because of device‐specific driveline differences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-28 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8247301/ /pubmed/33052592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.13843 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Main Text Articles Schlöglhofer, Thomas Michalovics, Peter Riebandt, Julia Angleitner, Philipp Stoiber, Martin Laufer, Günther Schima, Heinrich Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Moscato, Francesco Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
title | Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
title_full | Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
title_fullStr | Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
title_short | Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
title_sort | left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices |
topic | Main Text Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33052592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.13843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schloglhoferthomas leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT michalovicspeter leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT riebandtjulia leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT angleitnerphilipp leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT stoibermartin leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT laufergunther leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT schimaheinrich leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT wiedemanndominik leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT zimpferdaniel leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices AT moscatofrancesco leftventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfectionsinthreecontemporarydevices |