Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobbezoo, Frank, Ahlberg, Jari, Aarab, Ghizlane, Manfredini, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13063
_version_ 1783716496690642944
author Lobbezoo, Frank
Ahlberg, Jari
Aarab, Ghizlane
Manfredini, Daniele
author_facet Lobbezoo, Frank
Ahlberg, Jari
Aarab, Ghizlane
Manfredini, Daniele
author_sort Lobbezoo, Frank
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82473152021-07-02 Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option Lobbezoo, Frank Ahlberg, Jari Aarab, Ghizlane Manfredini, Daniele J Oral Rehabil Letter to the Editor John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-19 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8247315/ /pubmed/32812239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13063 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Lobbezoo, Frank
Ahlberg, Jari
Aarab, Ghizlane
Manfredini, Daniele
Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
title Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
title_full Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
title_fullStr Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
title_full_unstemmed Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
title_short Why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
title_sort why using ‘harmless behaviour’, ‘risk factor’ and ‘protective factor’ as terms describing the various possible consequences of bruxism is still the best option
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13063
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbezoofrank whyusingharmlessbehaviourriskfactorandprotectivefactorastermsdescribingthevariouspossibleconsequencesofbruxismisstillthebestoption
AT ahlbergjari whyusingharmlessbehaviourriskfactorandprotectivefactorastermsdescribingthevariouspossibleconsequencesofbruxismisstillthebestoption
AT aarabghizlane whyusingharmlessbehaviourriskfactorandprotectivefactorastermsdescribingthevariouspossibleconsequencesofbruxismisstillthebestoption
AT manfredinidaniele whyusingharmlessbehaviourriskfactorandprotectivefactorastermsdescribingthevariouspossibleconsequencesofbruxismisstillthebestoption

Ejemplares similares