Cargando…

A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting

PURPOSE: To share better practice in establishing data monitoring committees (DMCs) for observational, retrospective safety studies with joint‐industry sponsorship. METHODS: A DMC model was created to monitor data from an observational, retrospective, post‐authorization safety study investigating ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Major‐Pedersen, Atheline, McCullen, Mary Kate, Sabol, Mary Elizabeth, Adetunji, Omolara, Massaro, Joseph, Neugut, Alfred I., Sosa, Julie Ann, Hollenberg, Anthony N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5172
_version_ 1783716503065985024
author Major‐Pedersen, Atheline
McCullen, Mary Kate
Sabol, Mary Elizabeth
Adetunji, Omolara
Massaro, Joseph
Neugut, Alfred I.
Sosa, Julie Ann
Hollenberg, Anthony N.
author_facet Major‐Pedersen, Atheline
McCullen, Mary Kate
Sabol, Mary Elizabeth
Adetunji, Omolara
Massaro, Joseph
Neugut, Alfred I.
Sosa, Julie Ann
Hollenberg, Anthony N.
author_sort Major‐Pedersen, Atheline
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To share better practice in establishing data monitoring committees (DMCs) for observational, retrospective safety studies with joint‐industry sponsorship. METHODS: A DMC model was created to monitor data from an observational, retrospective, post‐authorization safety study investigating risk of medullary thyroid cancer in patients treated with long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (LA GLP‐1RAs) (NCT01511393). Sponsors reviewed regulatory guidelines, best practice and sponsors' standard operation procedures on DMCs. Discussions were held within the four‐member consortium, assessing applicability to observational, retrospective, real‐world studies. A DMC charter was drafted based on a sponsor‐proposed, adapted DMC model. Thereafter, a kick‐off meeting between sponsors and DMC members was held to receive DMC input and finalize the charter. RESULTS: Due to this study's observational, retrospective nature, assuring participant safety – central for traditional explanatory clinical trial models – was not applicable to our DMC model. The overall strategy and key indication for our real‐world model included preserving study integrity and credibility. Therefore, DMC member independence and their contribution of expert knowledge were essential. To ensure between‐sponsor data confidentiality, all study committees/corporations and sponsors, besides the DMC, received blinded data only (adapted to refer to data blinding that revealed the specific marketed LA GLP‐1RA/sponsor). Communication and blinding/unblinding of these data were facilitated by the contract research organization, which also provided crucial operational oversight. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we have established the first DMC model for joint industry‐sponsored, observational, retrospective safety studies. This model could serve as a precedent for others performing similar post‐marketing, joint industry‐sponsored pharmacovigilance activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82473412021-07-02 A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting Major‐Pedersen, Atheline McCullen, Mary Kate Sabol, Mary Elizabeth Adetunji, Omolara Massaro, Joseph Neugut, Alfred I. Sosa, Julie Ann Hollenberg, Anthony N. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Article PURPOSE: To share better practice in establishing data monitoring committees (DMCs) for observational, retrospective safety studies with joint‐industry sponsorship. METHODS: A DMC model was created to monitor data from an observational, retrospective, post‐authorization safety study investigating risk of medullary thyroid cancer in patients treated with long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (LA GLP‐1RAs) (NCT01511393). Sponsors reviewed regulatory guidelines, best practice and sponsors' standard operation procedures on DMCs. Discussions were held within the four‐member consortium, assessing applicability to observational, retrospective, real‐world studies. A DMC charter was drafted based on a sponsor‐proposed, adapted DMC model. Thereafter, a kick‐off meeting between sponsors and DMC members was held to receive DMC input and finalize the charter. RESULTS: Due to this study's observational, retrospective nature, assuring participant safety – central for traditional explanatory clinical trial models – was not applicable to our DMC model. The overall strategy and key indication for our real‐world model included preserving study integrity and credibility. Therefore, DMC member independence and their contribution of expert knowledge were essential. To ensure between‐sponsor data confidentiality, all study committees/corporations and sponsors, besides the DMC, received blinded data only (adapted to refer to data blinding that revealed the specific marketed LA GLP‐1RA/sponsor). Communication and blinding/unblinding of these data were facilitated by the contract research organization, which also provided crucial operational oversight. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we have established the first DMC model for joint industry‐sponsored, observational, retrospective safety studies. This model could serve as a precedent for others performing similar post‐marketing, joint industry‐sponsored pharmacovigilance activities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-11-24 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8247341/ /pubmed/33179845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5172 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Major‐Pedersen, Atheline
McCullen, Mary Kate
Sabol, Mary Elizabeth
Adetunji, Omolara
Massaro, Joseph
Neugut, Alfred I.
Sosa, Julie Ann
Hollenberg, Anthony N.
A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
title A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
title_full A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
title_fullStr A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
title_full_unstemmed A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
title_short A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
title_sort joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5172
work_keys_str_mv AT majorpedersenatheline ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT mccullenmarykate ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT sabolmaryelizabeth ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT adetunjiomolara ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT massarojoseph ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT neugutalfredi ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT sosajulieann ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT hollenberganthonyn ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT majorpedersenatheline jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT mccullenmarykate jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT sabolmaryelizabeth jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT adetunjiomolara jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT massarojoseph jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT neugutalfredi jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT sosajulieann jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting
AT hollenberganthonyn jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting