Cargando…
A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting
PURPOSE: To share better practice in establishing data monitoring committees (DMCs) for observational, retrospective safety studies with joint‐industry sponsorship. METHODS: A DMC model was created to monitor data from an observational, retrospective, post‐authorization safety study investigating ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5172 |
_version_ | 1783716503065985024 |
---|---|
author | Major‐Pedersen, Atheline McCullen, Mary Kate Sabol, Mary Elizabeth Adetunji, Omolara Massaro, Joseph Neugut, Alfred I. Sosa, Julie Ann Hollenberg, Anthony N. |
author_facet | Major‐Pedersen, Atheline McCullen, Mary Kate Sabol, Mary Elizabeth Adetunji, Omolara Massaro, Joseph Neugut, Alfred I. Sosa, Julie Ann Hollenberg, Anthony N. |
author_sort | Major‐Pedersen, Atheline |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To share better practice in establishing data monitoring committees (DMCs) for observational, retrospective safety studies with joint‐industry sponsorship. METHODS: A DMC model was created to monitor data from an observational, retrospective, post‐authorization safety study investigating risk of medullary thyroid cancer in patients treated with long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (LA GLP‐1RAs) (NCT01511393). Sponsors reviewed regulatory guidelines, best practice and sponsors' standard operation procedures on DMCs. Discussions were held within the four‐member consortium, assessing applicability to observational, retrospective, real‐world studies. A DMC charter was drafted based on a sponsor‐proposed, adapted DMC model. Thereafter, a kick‐off meeting between sponsors and DMC members was held to receive DMC input and finalize the charter. RESULTS: Due to this study's observational, retrospective nature, assuring participant safety – central for traditional explanatory clinical trial models – was not applicable to our DMC model. The overall strategy and key indication for our real‐world model included preserving study integrity and credibility. Therefore, DMC member independence and their contribution of expert knowledge were essential. To ensure between‐sponsor data confidentiality, all study committees/corporations and sponsors, besides the DMC, received blinded data only (adapted to refer to data blinding that revealed the specific marketed LA GLP‐1RA/sponsor). Communication and blinding/unblinding of these data were facilitated by the contract research organization, which also provided crucial operational oversight. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we have established the first DMC model for joint industry‐sponsored, observational, retrospective safety studies. This model could serve as a precedent for others performing similar post‐marketing, joint industry‐sponsored pharmacovigilance activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82473412021-07-02 A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting Major‐Pedersen, Atheline McCullen, Mary Kate Sabol, Mary Elizabeth Adetunji, Omolara Massaro, Joseph Neugut, Alfred I. Sosa, Julie Ann Hollenberg, Anthony N. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Article PURPOSE: To share better practice in establishing data monitoring committees (DMCs) for observational, retrospective safety studies with joint‐industry sponsorship. METHODS: A DMC model was created to monitor data from an observational, retrospective, post‐authorization safety study investigating risk of medullary thyroid cancer in patients treated with long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (LA GLP‐1RAs) (NCT01511393). Sponsors reviewed regulatory guidelines, best practice and sponsors' standard operation procedures on DMCs. Discussions were held within the four‐member consortium, assessing applicability to observational, retrospective, real‐world studies. A DMC charter was drafted based on a sponsor‐proposed, adapted DMC model. Thereafter, a kick‐off meeting between sponsors and DMC members was held to receive DMC input and finalize the charter. RESULTS: Due to this study's observational, retrospective nature, assuring participant safety – central for traditional explanatory clinical trial models – was not applicable to our DMC model. The overall strategy and key indication for our real‐world model included preserving study integrity and credibility. Therefore, DMC member independence and their contribution of expert knowledge were essential. To ensure between‐sponsor data confidentiality, all study committees/corporations and sponsors, besides the DMC, received blinded data only (adapted to refer to data blinding that revealed the specific marketed LA GLP‐1RA/sponsor). Communication and blinding/unblinding of these data were facilitated by the contract research organization, which also provided crucial operational oversight. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we have established the first DMC model for joint industry‐sponsored, observational, retrospective safety studies. This model could serve as a precedent for others performing similar post‐marketing, joint industry‐sponsored pharmacovigilance activities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-11-24 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8247341/ /pubmed/33179845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5172 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Major‐Pedersen, Atheline McCullen, Mary Kate Sabol, Mary Elizabeth Adetunji, Omolara Massaro, Joseph Neugut, Alfred I. Sosa, Julie Ann Hollenberg, Anthony N. A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
title | A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
title_full | A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
title_fullStr | A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
title_full_unstemmed | A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
title_short | A joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
title_sort | joint industry‐sponsored data monitoring committee model for observational, retrospective drug safety studies in the real‐world setting |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majorpedersenatheline ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT mccullenmarykate ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT sabolmaryelizabeth ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT adetunjiomolara ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT massarojoseph ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT neugutalfredi ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT sosajulieann ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT hollenberganthonyn ajointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT majorpedersenatheline jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT mccullenmarykate jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT sabolmaryelizabeth jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT adetunjiomolara jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT massarojoseph jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT neugutalfredi jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT sosajulieann jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting AT hollenberganthonyn jointindustrysponsoreddatamonitoringcommitteemodelforobservationalretrospectivedrugsafetystudiesintherealworldsetting |