Cargando…

Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garming Legert, Karin, Ringdén, Olle, Remberger, Mats, Törlén, Johan, Mattsson, Jonas, Dahllöf, Göran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33012083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13663
_version_ 1783716508626583552
author Garming Legert, Karin
Ringdén, Olle
Remberger, Mats
Törlén, Johan
Mattsson, Jonas
Dahllöf, Göran
author_facet Garming Legert, Karin
Ringdén, Olle
Remberger, Mats
Törlén, Johan
Mattsson, Jonas
Dahllöf, Göran
author_sort Garming Legert, Karin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 141 patients: 73 randomized to receive Tac/Sir and 68 to receive CsA/Mtx. The oral mucositis assessment scale and toxicity grading according to WHO were used to assess the severity, peak and duration of oral mucositis from the day −3 to day 24 post‐transplant. RESULTS: Eighty‐seven patients developed oral mucositis in the first 24 days post‐transplant. No significant difference in oral mucositis severity between the Tac/Sir and CsA/Mtx groups was observed. The peak oral mucositis score occurred on day 10 in both groups. Although oral mucositis scores had returned to baseline in the CsA/Mtx group on day 24 post‐transplant, no significant difference compared with the Tac/Sir group was found. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tacrolimus/sirolimus as a graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation increased neither the incidence nor severity of oral mucositis compared with cyclosporine/methotrexate. Furthermore, oral mucositis healing was not prolonged and followed the same time pattern as cyclosporine/methotrexate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82473642021-07-02 Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis Garming Legert, Karin Ringdén, Olle Remberger, Mats Törlén, Johan Mattsson, Jonas Dahllöf, Göran Oral Dis Oral Mucosa OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 141 patients: 73 randomized to receive Tac/Sir and 68 to receive CsA/Mtx. The oral mucositis assessment scale and toxicity grading according to WHO were used to assess the severity, peak and duration of oral mucositis from the day −3 to day 24 post‐transplant. RESULTS: Eighty‐seven patients developed oral mucositis in the first 24 days post‐transplant. No significant difference in oral mucositis severity between the Tac/Sir and CsA/Mtx groups was observed. The peak oral mucositis score occurred on day 10 in both groups. Although oral mucositis scores had returned to baseline in the CsA/Mtx group on day 24 post‐transplant, no significant difference compared with the Tac/Sir group was found. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tacrolimus/sirolimus as a graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation increased neither the incidence nor severity of oral mucositis compared with cyclosporine/methotrexate. Furthermore, oral mucositis healing was not prolonged and followed the same time pattern as cyclosporine/methotrexate. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-27 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8247364/ /pubmed/33012083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13663 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Mucosa
Garming Legert, Karin
Ringdén, Olle
Remberger, Mats
Törlén, Johan
Mattsson, Jonas
Dahllöf, Göran
Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
title Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
title_full Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
title_fullStr Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
title_short Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
title_sort oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
topic Oral Mucosa
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33012083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13663
work_keys_str_mv AT garminglegertkarin oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis
AT ringdenolle oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis
AT rembergermats oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis
AT torlenjohan oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis
AT mattssonjonas oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis
AT dahllofgoran oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis