Cargando…
Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33012083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13663 |
_version_ | 1783716508626583552 |
---|---|
author | Garming Legert, Karin Ringdén, Olle Remberger, Mats Törlén, Johan Mattsson, Jonas Dahllöf, Göran |
author_facet | Garming Legert, Karin Ringdén, Olle Remberger, Mats Törlén, Johan Mattsson, Jonas Dahllöf, Göran |
author_sort | Garming Legert, Karin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 141 patients: 73 randomized to receive Tac/Sir and 68 to receive CsA/Mtx. The oral mucositis assessment scale and toxicity grading according to WHO were used to assess the severity, peak and duration of oral mucositis from the day −3 to day 24 post‐transplant. RESULTS: Eighty‐seven patients developed oral mucositis in the first 24 days post‐transplant. No significant difference in oral mucositis severity between the Tac/Sir and CsA/Mtx groups was observed. The peak oral mucositis score occurred on day 10 in both groups. Although oral mucositis scores had returned to baseline in the CsA/Mtx group on day 24 post‐transplant, no significant difference compared with the Tac/Sir group was found. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tacrolimus/sirolimus as a graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation increased neither the incidence nor severity of oral mucositis compared with cyclosporine/methotrexate. Furthermore, oral mucositis healing was not prolonged and followed the same time pattern as cyclosporine/methotrexate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82473642021-07-02 Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis Garming Legert, Karin Ringdén, Olle Remberger, Mats Törlén, Johan Mattsson, Jonas Dahllöf, Göran Oral Dis Oral Mucosa OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 141 patients: 73 randomized to receive Tac/Sir and 68 to receive CsA/Mtx. The oral mucositis assessment scale and toxicity grading according to WHO were used to assess the severity, peak and duration of oral mucositis from the day −3 to day 24 post‐transplant. RESULTS: Eighty‐seven patients developed oral mucositis in the first 24 days post‐transplant. No significant difference in oral mucositis severity between the Tac/Sir and CsA/Mtx groups was observed. The peak oral mucositis score occurred on day 10 in both groups. Although oral mucositis scores had returned to baseline in the CsA/Mtx group on day 24 post‐transplant, no significant difference compared with the Tac/Sir group was found. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tacrolimus/sirolimus as a graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation increased neither the incidence nor severity of oral mucositis compared with cyclosporine/methotrexate. Furthermore, oral mucositis healing was not prolonged and followed the same time pattern as cyclosporine/methotrexate. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-27 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8247364/ /pubmed/33012083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13663 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oral Mucosa Garming Legert, Karin Ringdén, Olle Remberger, Mats Törlén, Johan Mattsson, Jonas Dahllöf, Göran Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
title | Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
title_full | Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
title_short | Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
title_sort | oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis |
topic | Oral Mucosa |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33012083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garminglegertkarin oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis AT ringdenolle oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis AT rembergermats oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis AT torlenjohan oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis AT mattssonjonas oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis AT dahllofgoran oralmucositisaftertacrolimussirolimusorcyclosporinemethotrexateasgraftversushostdiseaseprophylaxis |