Cargando…
A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
OBJECTIVE: Current type 2 diabetes (T2D) management contraindicates intensive glycemia treatment in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and is partially motivated by evidence of harms in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Heterogeneity in response...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2700 |
_version_ | 1783716535466983424 |
---|---|
author | Mariam, Arshiya Miller-Atkins, Galen Pantalone, Kevin M. Zimmerman, Robert S. Barnard, John Kattan, Michael W. Shah, Hetal McLeod, Howard L. Doria, Alessandro Wagner, Michael J. Buse, John B. Motsinger-Reif, Alison A. Rotroff, Daniel M. |
author_facet | Mariam, Arshiya Miller-Atkins, Galen Pantalone, Kevin M. Zimmerman, Robert S. Barnard, John Kattan, Michael W. Shah, Hetal McLeod, Howard L. Doria, Alessandro Wagner, Michael J. Buse, John B. Motsinger-Reif, Alison A. Rotroff, Daniel M. |
author_sort | Mariam, Arshiya |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Current type 2 diabetes (T2D) management contraindicates intensive glycemia treatment in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and is partially motivated by evidence of harms in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Heterogeneity in response to intensive glycemia treatment has been observed, suggesting potential benefit for some individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ACCORD was a randomized controlled trial that investigated whether intensively treating glycemia in individuals with T2D would reduce CVD outcomes. Using a novel approach to cluster HbA(1c) trajectories, we identified groups in the intensive glycemia arm with modified CVD risk. Genome-wide analysis and polygenic score (PS) were developed to predict group membership. Mendelian randomization was performed to infer causality. RESULTS: We identified four clinical groupings in the intensive glycemia arm, and clinical group 4 (C4) displayed fewer CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; P = 2.01 × 10(−3)) and microvascular outcomes (HR 0.86; P = 0.015) than those receiving standard treatment. A single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs220721, in MAS1 reached suggestive significance in C4 (P = 4.34 × 10(−7)). PS predicted C4 with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.98), and this predicted C4 displayed reduced CVD risk with intensive versus standard glycemia treatment (HR 0.53; P = 4.02 × 10(−6)), but not reduced risk of microvascular outcomes (P < 0.05). Mendelian randomization indicated causality between PS, on-trial HbA(1c), and reduction in CVD outcomes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a T2D clinical group in ACCORD that benefited from intensive glycemia treatment, and membership in this group could be predicted using genetic variants. This study generates new hypotheses with implications for precision medicine in T2D and represents an important development in this landmark clinical trial warranting further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82474982021-10-24 A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment Mariam, Arshiya Miller-Atkins, Galen Pantalone, Kevin M. Zimmerman, Robert S. Barnard, John Kattan, Michael W. Shah, Hetal McLeod, Howard L. Doria, Alessandro Wagner, Michael J. Buse, John B. Motsinger-Reif, Alison A. Rotroff, Daniel M. Diabetes Care Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk OBJECTIVE: Current type 2 diabetes (T2D) management contraindicates intensive glycemia treatment in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and is partially motivated by evidence of harms in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Heterogeneity in response to intensive glycemia treatment has been observed, suggesting potential benefit for some individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ACCORD was a randomized controlled trial that investigated whether intensively treating glycemia in individuals with T2D would reduce CVD outcomes. Using a novel approach to cluster HbA(1c) trajectories, we identified groups in the intensive glycemia arm with modified CVD risk. Genome-wide analysis and polygenic score (PS) were developed to predict group membership. Mendelian randomization was performed to infer causality. RESULTS: We identified four clinical groupings in the intensive glycemia arm, and clinical group 4 (C4) displayed fewer CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; P = 2.01 × 10(−3)) and microvascular outcomes (HR 0.86; P = 0.015) than those receiving standard treatment. A single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs220721, in MAS1 reached suggestive significance in C4 (P = 4.34 × 10(−7)). PS predicted C4 with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.98), and this predicted C4 displayed reduced CVD risk with intensive versus standard glycemia treatment (HR 0.53; P = 4.02 × 10(−6)), but not reduced risk of microvascular outcomes (P < 0.05). Mendelian randomization indicated causality between PS, on-trial HbA(1c), and reduction in CVD outcomes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a T2D clinical group in ACCORD that benefited from intensive glycemia treatment, and membership in this group could be predicted using genetic variants. This study generates new hypotheses with implications for precision medicine in T2D and represents an important development in this landmark clinical trial warranting further investigation. American Diabetes Association 2021-06 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8247498/ /pubmed/33863751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2700 Text en © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Mariam, Arshiya Miller-Atkins, Galen Pantalone, Kevin M. Zimmerman, Robert S. Barnard, John Kattan, Michael W. Shah, Hetal McLeod, Howard L. Doria, Alessandro Wagner, Michael J. Buse, John B. Motsinger-Reif, Alison A. Rotroff, Daniel M. A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment |
title | A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment |
title_full | A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment |
title_fullStr | A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment |
title_short | A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment |
title_sort | type 2 diabetes subtype responsive to accord intensive glycemia treatment |
topic | Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mariamarshiya atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT milleratkinsgalen atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT pantalonekevinm atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT zimmermanroberts atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT barnardjohn atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT kattanmichaelw atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT shahhetal atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT mcleodhowardl atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT doriaalessandro atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT wagnermichaelj atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT busejohnb atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT motsingerreifalisona atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT rotroffdanielm atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT mariamarshiya type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT milleratkinsgalen type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT pantalonekevinm type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT zimmermanroberts type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT barnardjohn type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT kattanmichaelw type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT shahhetal type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT mcleodhowardl type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT doriaalessandro type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT wagnermichaelj type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT busejohnb type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT motsingerreifalisona type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment AT rotroffdanielm type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment |