Cargando…

A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment

OBJECTIVE: Current type 2 diabetes (T2D) management contraindicates intensive glycemia treatment in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and is partially motivated by evidence of harms in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Heterogeneity in response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariam, Arshiya, Miller-Atkins, Galen, Pantalone, Kevin M., Zimmerman, Robert S., Barnard, John, Kattan, Michael W., Shah, Hetal, McLeod, Howard L., Doria, Alessandro, Wagner, Michael J., Buse, John B., Motsinger-Reif, Alison A., Rotroff, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863751
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2700
_version_ 1783716535466983424
author Mariam, Arshiya
Miller-Atkins, Galen
Pantalone, Kevin M.
Zimmerman, Robert S.
Barnard, John
Kattan, Michael W.
Shah, Hetal
McLeod, Howard L.
Doria, Alessandro
Wagner, Michael J.
Buse, John B.
Motsinger-Reif, Alison A.
Rotroff, Daniel M.
author_facet Mariam, Arshiya
Miller-Atkins, Galen
Pantalone, Kevin M.
Zimmerman, Robert S.
Barnard, John
Kattan, Michael W.
Shah, Hetal
McLeod, Howard L.
Doria, Alessandro
Wagner, Michael J.
Buse, John B.
Motsinger-Reif, Alison A.
Rotroff, Daniel M.
author_sort Mariam, Arshiya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Current type 2 diabetes (T2D) management contraindicates intensive glycemia treatment in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and is partially motivated by evidence of harms in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Heterogeneity in response to intensive glycemia treatment has been observed, suggesting potential benefit for some individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ACCORD was a randomized controlled trial that investigated whether intensively treating glycemia in individuals with T2D would reduce CVD outcomes. Using a novel approach to cluster HbA(1c) trajectories, we identified groups in the intensive glycemia arm with modified CVD risk. Genome-wide analysis and polygenic score (PS) were developed to predict group membership. Mendelian randomization was performed to infer causality. RESULTS: We identified four clinical groupings in the intensive glycemia arm, and clinical group 4 (C4) displayed fewer CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; P = 2.01 × 10(−3)) and microvascular outcomes (HR 0.86; P = 0.015) than those receiving standard treatment. A single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs220721, in MAS1 reached suggestive significance in C4 (P = 4.34 × 10(−7)). PS predicted C4 with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.98), and this predicted C4 displayed reduced CVD risk with intensive versus standard glycemia treatment (HR 0.53; P = 4.02 × 10(−6)), but not reduced risk of microvascular outcomes (P < 0.05). Mendelian randomization indicated causality between PS, on-trial HbA(1c), and reduction in CVD outcomes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a T2D clinical group in ACCORD that benefited from intensive glycemia treatment, and membership in this group could be predicted using genetic variants. This study generates new hypotheses with implications for precision medicine in T2D and represents an important development in this landmark clinical trial warranting further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82474982021-10-24 A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment Mariam, Arshiya Miller-Atkins, Galen Pantalone, Kevin M. Zimmerman, Robert S. Barnard, John Kattan, Michael W. Shah, Hetal McLeod, Howard L. Doria, Alessandro Wagner, Michael J. Buse, John B. Motsinger-Reif, Alison A. Rotroff, Daniel M. Diabetes Care Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk OBJECTIVE: Current type 2 diabetes (T2D) management contraindicates intensive glycemia treatment in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and is partially motivated by evidence of harms in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Heterogeneity in response to intensive glycemia treatment has been observed, suggesting potential benefit for some individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ACCORD was a randomized controlled trial that investigated whether intensively treating glycemia in individuals with T2D would reduce CVD outcomes. Using a novel approach to cluster HbA(1c) trajectories, we identified groups in the intensive glycemia arm with modified CVD risk. Genome-wide analysis and polygenic score (PS) were developed to predict group membership. Mendelian randomization was performed to infer causality. RESULTS: We identified four clinical groupings in the intensive glycemia arm, and clinical group 4 (C4) displayed fewer CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; P = 2.01 × 10(−3)) and microvascular outcomes (HR 0.86; P = 0.015) than those receiving standard treatment. A single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs220721, in MAS1 reached suggestive significance in C4 (P = 4.34 × 10(−7)). PS predicted C4 with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.98), and this predicted C4 displayed reduced CVD risk with intensive versus standard glycemia treatment (HR 0.53; P = 4.02 × 10(−6)), but not reduced risk of microvascular outcomes (P < 0.05). Mendelian randomization indicated causality between PS, on-trial HbA(1c), and reduction in CVD outcomes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a T2D clinical group in ACCORD that benefited from intensive glycemia treatment, and membership in this group could be predicted using genetic variants. This study generates new hypotheses with implications for precision medicine in T2D and represents an important development in this landmark clinical trial warranting further investigation. American Diabetes Association 2021-06 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8247498/ /pubmed/33863751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2700 Text en © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk
Mariam, Arshiya
Miller-Atkins, Galen
Pantalone, Kevin M.
Zimmerman, Robert S.
Barnard, John
Kattan, Michael W.
Shah, Hetal
McLeod, Howard L.
Doria, Alessandro
Wagner, Michael J.
Buse, John B.
Motsinger-Reif, Alison A.
Rotroff, Daniel M.
A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
title A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
title_full A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
title_fullStr A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
title_full_unstemmed A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
title_short A Type 2 Diabetes Subtype Responsive to ACCORD Intensive Glycemia Treatment
title_sort type 2 diabetes subtype responsive to accord intensive glycemia treatment
topic Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863751
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2700
work_keys_str_mv AT mariamarshiya atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT milleratkinsgalen atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT pantalonekevinm atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT zimmermanroberts atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT barnardjohn atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT kattanmichaelw atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT shahhetal atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT mcleodhowardl atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT doriaalessandro atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT wagnermichaelj atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT busejohnb atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT motsingerreifalisona atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT rotroffdanielm atype2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT mariamarshiya type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT milleratkinsgalen type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT pantalonekevinm type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT zimmermanroberts type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT barnardjohn type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT kattanmichaelw type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT shahhetal type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT mcleodhowardl type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT doriaalessandro type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT wagnermichaelj type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT busejohnb type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT motsingerreifalisona type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment
AT rotroffdanielm type2diabetessubtyperesponsivetoaccordintensiveglycemiatreatment