Cargando…

Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises

This study was to investigate whether human listeners are able to detect a binaurally uncorrelated arbitrary-noise fragment embedded in binaurally identical arbitrary-noise markers [a break in correlation, break in interaural correlation (BIAC)] in either frequency-constant (frequency-steady) or fre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Langchen, Kong, Lingzhi, Li, Liang, Qu, Tianshu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692785
_version_ 1783716561489494016
author Fan, Langchen
Kong, Lingzhi
Li, Liang
Qu, Tianshu
author_facet Fan, Langchen
Kong, Lingzhi
Li, Liang
Qu, Tianshu
author_sort Fan, Langchen
collection PubMed
description This study was to investigate whether human listeners are able to detect a binaurally uncorrelated arbitrary-noise fragment embedded in binaurally identical arbitrary-noise markers [a break in correlation, break in interaural correlation (BIAC)] in either frequency-constant (frequency-steady) or frequency-varied (unidirectionally frequency gliding) noise. Ten participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 1 for up-gliding, down-gliding, and frequency-steady noises. Twenty-one participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 2a for both up-gliding and frequency-steady noises. Another nineteen participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 2b for both down-gliding and frequency-steady noises. Listeners were able to detect a BIAC in the frequency-steady noise (center frequency = 400 Hz) and two types of frequency-gliding noises (center frequency: between 100 and 1,600 Hz). The duration threshold for detecting the BIAC in frequency-gliding noises was significantly longer than that in the frequency-steady noise (Experiment 1), and the longest interaural delay at which a duration-fixed BIAC (200 ms) in frequency-gliding noises could be detected was significantly shorter than that in the frequency-steady noise (Experiment 2). Although human listeners can detect a BIAC in frequency-gliding noises, their sensitivity to a BIAC in frequency-gliding noises is much lower than that in frequency-steady noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82476552021-07-02 Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises Fan, Langchen Kong, Lingzhi Li, Liang Qu, Tianshu Front Psychol Psychology This study was to investigate whether human listeners are able to detect a binaurally uncorrelated arbitrary-noise fragment embedded in binaurally identical arbitrary-noise markers [a break in correlation, break in interaural correlation (BIAC)] in either frequency-constant (frequency-steady) or frequency-varied (unidirectionally frequency gliding) noise. Ten participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 1 for up-gliding, down-gliding, and frequency-steady noises. Twenty-one participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 2a for both up-gliding and frequency-steady noises. Another nineteen participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 2b for both down-gliding and frequency-steady noises. Listeners were able to detect a BIAC in the frequency-steady noise (center frequency = 400 Hz) and two types of frequency-gliding noises (center frequency: between 100 and 1,600 Hz). The duration threshold for detecting the BIAC in frequency-gliding noises was significantly longer than that in the frequency-steady noise (Experiment 1), and the longest interaural delay at which a duration-fixed BIAC (200 ms) in frequency-gliding noises could be detected was significantly shorter than that in the frequency-steady noise (Experiment 2). Although human listeners can detect a BIAC in frequency-gliding noises, their sensitivity to a BIAC in frequency-gliding noises is much lower than that in frequency-steady noise. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8247655/ /pubmed/34220654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692785 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fan, Kong, Li and Qu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Fan, Langchen
Kong, Lingzhi
Li, Liang
Qu, Tianshu
Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises
title Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises
title_full Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises
title_fullStr Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises
title_short Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises
title_sort sensitivity to a break in interaural correlation in frequency-gliding noises
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692785
work_keys_str_mv AT fanlangchen sensitivitytoabreakininterauralcorrelationinfrequencyglidingnoises
AT konglingzhi sensitivitytoabreakininterauralcorrelationinfrequencyglidingnoises
AT liliang sensitivitytoabreakininterauralcorrelationinfrequencyglidingnoises
AT qutianshu sensitivitytoabreakininterauralcorrelationinfrequencyglidingnoises