Cargando…
Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: For maintenance of anesthesia for intracranial aneurysmal neck clipping, both intravenous and inhalational anesthetics are in vogue. We aimed to evaluate the superiority of one agent over the other for long-term neurological outcomes in these patients. METHODS: This prospective assessor-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221630 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_342_2021 |
_version_ | 1783716568646025216 |
---|---|
author | Bhagat, Hemant Sharma, Tanavi Mahajan, Shalvi Kumar, Munish Saharan, Poonam Bhardwaj, Avanish Sachdeva, Naresh Gandhi, Komal Jangra, Kiran Panda, Nidhi Bidyut Singla, Navneet Kishore, Kamal Singh, Nidhi |
author_facet | Bhagat, Hemant Sharma, Tanavi Mahajan, Shalvi Kumar, Munish Saharan, Poonam Bhardwaj, Avanish Sachdeva, Naresh Gandhi, Komal Jangra, Kiran Panda, Nidhi Bidyut Singla, Navneet Kishore, Kamal Singh, Nidhi |
author_sort | Bhagat, Hemant |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For maintenance of anesthesia for intracranial aneurysmal neck clipping, both intravenous and inhalational anesthetics are in vogue. We aimed to evaluate the superiority of one agent over the other for long-term neurological outcomes in these patients. METHODS: This prospective assessor-blind randomized study was conducted in 106 patients of 18–65 years of age with World Federation of Neurosurgeons Grade I-II of subarachnoid hemorrhage. After written informed consent, the patients were randomized into – intravenous group (Propofol) and inhalational group (Desflurane). The primary outcome was to study neurological outcome using Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at 3 months following discharge while secondary outcomes included intraoperative brain condition, intraoperative hemodynamics, duration of hospital stay, Modified Rankin Score (MRS) at discharge, MRS, and Barthel’s index at 3 months following discharge and estimation of perioperative biomarkers of brain injury. RESULTS: The GOS at 3 months was 5 (5.00–5.00) in the propofol group and 5 (4.00–5.00) in the desflurane group (P = 0.24). Both the anesthetics were similar in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, brain relaxation, duration of hospital stay, MRS at discharge and 3 months, and Barthel Index at 3 months (P > 0.05). The perioperative serum interleukin-6 and S100B were comparable among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The long-term neurological outcome of good grade aneurysm patients undergoing craniotomy and clipping remains comparable with the use of either propofol or desflurane. The effect of the two anesthetic agents on the various clinical parameters and the biomarkers of brain injury is also similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82476872021-07-02 Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study Bhagat, Hemant Sharma, Tanavi Mahajan, Shalvi Kumar, Munish Saharan, Poonam Bhardwaj, Avanish Sachdeva, Naresh Gandhi, Komal Jangra, Kiran Panda, Nidhi Bidyut Singla, Navneet Kishore, Kamal Singh, Nidhi Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: For maintenance of anesthesia for intracranial aneurysmal neck clipping, both intravenous and inhalational anesthetics are in vogue. We aimed to evaluate the superiority of one agent over the other for long-term neurological outcomes in these patients. METHODS: This prospective assessor-blind randomized study was conducted in 106 patients of 18–65 years of age with World Federation of Neurosurgeons Grade I-II of subarachnoid hemorrhage. After written informed consent, the patients were randomized into – intravenous group (Propofol) and inhalational group (Desflurane). The primary outcome was to study neurological outcome using Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at 3 months following discharge while secondary outcomes included intraoperative brain condition, intraoperative hemodynamics, duration of hospital stay, Modified Rankin Score (MRS) at discharge, MRS, and Barthel’s index at 3 months following discharge and estimation of perioperative biomarkers of brain injury. RESULTS: The GOS at 3 months was 5 (5.00–5.00) in the propofol group and 5 (4.00–5.00) in the desflurane group (P = 0.24). Both the anesthetics were similar in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, brain relaxation, duration of hospital stay, MRS at discharge and 3 months, and Barthel Index at 3 months (P > 0.05). The perioperative serum interleukin-6 and S100B were comparable among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The long-term neurological outcome of good grade aneurysm patients undergoing craniotomy and clipping remains comparable with the use of either propofol or desflurane. The effect of the two anesthetic agents on the various clinical parameters and the biomarkers of brain injury is also similar. Scientific Scholar 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8247687/ /pubmed/34221630 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_342_2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhagat, Hemant Sharma, Tanavi Mahajan, Shalvi Kumar, Munish Saharan, Poonam Bhardwaj, Avanish Sachdeva, Naresh Gandhi, Komal Jangra, Kiran Panda, Nidhi Bidyut Singla, Navneet Kishore, Kamal Singh, Nidhi Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title | Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_full | Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_short | Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study |
title_sort | intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221630 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_342_2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhagathemant intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sharmatanavi intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT mahajanshalvi intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kumarmunish intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT saharanpoonam intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT bhardwajavanish intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sachdevanaresh intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT gandhikomal intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT jangrakiran intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT pandanidhibidyut intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT singlanavneet intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kishorekamal intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT singhnidhi intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |