Cargando…

Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: For maintenance of anesthesia for intracranial aneurysmal neck clipping, both intravenous and inhalational anesthetics are in vogue. We aimed to evaluate the superiority of one agent over the other for long-term neurological outcomes in these patients. METHODS: This prospective assessor-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhagat, Hemant, Sharma, Tanavi, Mahajan, Shalvi, Kumar, Munish, Saharan, Poonam, Bhardwaj, Avanish, Sachdeva, Naresh, Gandhi, Komal, Jangra, Kiran, Panda, Nidhi Bidyut, Singla, Navneet, Kishore, Kamal, Singh, Nidhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221630
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_342_2021
_version_ 1783716568646025216
author Bhagat, Hemant
Sharma, Tanavi
Mahajan, Shalvi
Kumar, Munish
Saharan, Poonam
Bhardwaj, Avanish
Sachdeva, Naresh
Gandhi, Komal
Jangra, Kiran
Panda, Nidhi Bidyut
Singla, Navneet
Kishore, Kamal
Singh, Nidhi
author_facet Bhagat, Hemant
Sharma, Tanavi
Mahajan, Shalvi
Kumar, Munish
Saharan, Poonam
Bhardwaj, Avanish
Sachdeva, Naresh
Gandhi, Komal
Jangra, Kiran
Panda, Nidhi Bidyut
Singla, Navneet
Kishore, Kamal
Singh, Nidhi
author_sort Bhagat, Hemant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For maintenance of anesthesia for intracranial aneurysmal neck clipping, both intravenous and inhalational anesthetics are in vogue. We aimed to evaluate the superiority of one agent over the other for long-term neurological outcomes in these patients. METHODS: This prospective assessor-blind randomized study was conducted in 106 patients of 18–65 years of age with World Federation of Neurosurgeons Grade I-II of subarachnoid hemorrhage. After written informed consent, the patients were randomized into – intravenous group (Propofol) and inhalational group (Desflurane). The primary outcome was to study neurological outcome using Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at 3 months following discharge while secondary outcomes included intraoperative brain condition, intraoperative hemodynamics, duration of hospital stay, Modified Rankin Score (MRS) at discharge, MRS, and Barthel’s index at 3 months following discharge and estimation of perioperative biomarkers of brain injury. RESULTS: The GOS at 3 months was 5 (5.00–5.00) in the propofol group and 5 (4.00–5.00) in the desflurane group (P = 0.24). Both the anesthetics were similar in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, brain relaxation, duration of hospital stay, MRS at discharge and 3 months, and Barthel Index at 3 months (P > 0.05). The perioperative serum interleukin-6 and S100B were comparable among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The long-term neurological outcome of good grade aneurysm patients undergoing craniotomy and clipping remains comparable with the use of either propofol or desflurane. The effect of the two anesthetic agents on the various clinical parameters and the biomarkers of brain injury is also similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82476872021-07-02 Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study Bhagat, Hemant Sharma, Tanavi Mahajan, Shalvi Kumar, Munish Saharan, Poonam Bhardwaj, Avanish Sachdeva, Naresh Gandhi, Komal Jangra, Kiran Panda, Nidhi Bidyut Singla, Navneet Kishore, Kamal Singh, Nidhi Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: For maintenance of anesthesia for intracranial aneurysmal neck clipping, both intravenous and inhalational anesthetics are in vogue. We aimed to evaluate the superiority of one agent over the other for long-term neurological outcomes in these patients. METHODS: This prospective assessor-blind randomized study was conducted in 106 patients of 18–65 years of age with World Federation of Neurosurgeons Grade I-II of subarachnoid hemorrhage. After written informed consent, the patients were randomized into – intravenous group (Propofol) and inhalational group (Desflurane). The primary outcome was to study neurological outcome using Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at 3 months following discharge while secondary outcomes included intraoperative brain condition, intraoperative hemodynamics, duration of hospital stay, Modified Rankin Score (MRS) at discharge, MRS, and Barthel’s index at 3 months following discharge and estimation of perioperative biomarkers of brain injury. RESULTS: The GOS at 3 months was 5 (5.00–5.00) in the propofol group and 5 (4.00–5.00) in the desflurane group (P = 0.24). Both the anesthetics were similar in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, brain relaxation, duration of hospital stay, MRS at discharge and 3 months, and Barthel Index at 3 months (P > 0.05). The perioperative serum interleukin-6 and S100B were comparable among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The long-term neurological outcome of good grade aneurysm patients undergoing craniotomy and clipping remains comparable with the use of either propofol or desflurane. The effect of the two anesthetic agents on the various clinical parameters and the biomarkers of brain injury is also similar. Scientific Scholar 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8247687/ /pubmed/34221630 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_342_2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhagat, Hemant
Sharma, Tanavi
Mahajan, Shalvi
Kumar, Munish
Saharan, Poonam
Bhardwaj, Avanish
Sachdeva, Naresh
Gandhi, Komal
Jangra, Kiran
Panda, Nidhi Bidyut
Singla, Navneet
Kishore, Kamal
Singh, Nidhi
Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
title Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_full Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_short Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221630
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_342_2021
work_keys_str_mv AT bhagathemant intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sharmatanavi intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT mahajanshalvi intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarmunish intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT saharanpoonam intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT bhardwajavanish intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sachdevanaresh intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT gandhikomal intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jangrakiran intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT pandanidhibidyut intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT singlanavneet intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kishorekamal intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT singhnidhi intravenousversusinhalationalanesthesiatrialforoutcomefollowingintracranialaneurysmsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy