Cargando…

Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most hematological malignancy, has high incidence and remains incurable till now. The pathogenesis of MM is poorly understood. This study aimed to identify novel prognostic model for MM on gene expression profiles. METHODS: Gene expression datas of MM (G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Ying, Meng, Ye, Zhai, Zhimin, Xiong, Shudao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249481
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11320
_version_ 1783716572648439808
author Pan, Ying
Meng, Ye
Zhai, Zhimin
Xiong, Shudao
author_facet Pan, Ying
Meng, Ye
Zhai, Zhimin
Xiong, Shudao
author_sort Pan, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most hematological malignancy, has high incidence and remains incurable till now. The pathogenesis of MM is poorly understood. This study aimed to identify novel prognostic model for MM on gene expression profiles. METHODS: Gene expression datas of MM (GSE6477, GSE136337) were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in GSE6477 between case samples and normal control samples were screened by the limma package. Meanwhile, enrichment analysis was conducted, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of these DEGs was established by STRING and cytoscape software. Co-expression modules of genes were built by Weighted Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA). Key genes were identified both from hub genes and the DEGs. Univariate and multivariate Cox congression were performed to screen independent prognostic genes to construct a predictive model. The predictive power of the model was evaluated by Kaplan–Meier curve and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Finally, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyse were used to investigate whether the prognostic model could be independent of other clinical parameters. RESULTS: GSE6477, including 101 case and 15 normal control, were screened as the datasets. A total of 178 DEGs were identified, including 59 up-regulated and 119 down-regulated genes. In WGCNA analysis, module black and module purple were the most relevant modules with cancer traits, and 92 hub genes in these two modules were selected for further analysis. Next, 47 genes were chosen both from the DEGs and hub genes as key genes. Three genes (LYVE1, RNASE1, and RNASE2) were finally screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and used to construct a risk model. In addition, the three-gene prognostic model revealed independent and accurate prognostic capacity in relation to other clinical parameters for MM patients. CONCLUSION: In summary, we identified and constructed a three-gene-based prognostic model that could be used to predict overall survival of MM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82477042021-07-08 Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis Pan, Ying Meng, Ye Zhai, Zhimin Xiong, Shudao PeerJ Bioinformatics BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most hematological malignancy, has high incidence and remains incurable till now. The pathogenesis of MM is poorly understood. This study aimed to identify novel prognostic model for MM on gene expression profiles. METHODS: Gene expression datas of MM (GSE6477, GSE136337) were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in GSE6477 between case samples and normal control samples were screened by the limma package. Meanwhile, enrichment analysis was conducted, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of these DEGs was established by STRING and cytoscape software. Co-expression modules of genes were built by Weighted Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA). Key genes were identified both from hub genes and the DEGs. Univariate and multivariate Cox congression were performed to screen independent prognostic genes to construct a predictive model. The predictive power of the model was evaluated by Kaplan–Meier curve and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Finally, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyse were used to investigate whether the prognostic model could be independent of other clinical parameters. RESULTS: GSE6477, including 101 case and 15 normal control, were screened as the datasets. A total of 178 DEGs were identified, including 59 up-regulated and 119 down-regulated genes. In WGCNA analysis, module black and module purple were the most relevant modules with cancer traits, and 92 hub genes in these two modules were selected for further analysis. Next, 47 genes were chosen both from the DEGs and hub genes as key genes. Three genes (LYVE1, RNASE1, and RNASE2) were finally screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and used to construct a risk model. In addition, the three-gene prognostic model revealed independent and accurate prognostic capacity in relation to other clinical parameters for MM patients. CONCLUSION: In summary, we identified and constructed a three-gene-based prognostic model that could be used to predict overall survival of MM patients. PeerJ Inc. 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8247704/ /pubmed/34249481 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11320 Text en © 2021 Pan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioinformatics
Pan, Ying
Meng, Ye
Zhai, Zhimin
Xiong, Shudao
Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
title Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
title_full Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
title_fullStr Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
title_short Identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
title_sort identification of a three-gene-based prognostic model in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis
topic Bioinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249481
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11320
work_keys_str_mv AT panying identificationofathreegenebasedprognosticmodelinmultiplemyelomausingbioinformaticsanalysis
AT mengye identificationofathreegenebasedprognosticmodelinmultiplemyelomausingbioinformaticsanalysis
AT zhaizhimin identificationofathreegenebasedprognosticmodelinmultiplemyelomausingbioinformaticsanalysis
AT xiongshudao identificationofathreegenebasedprognosticmodelinmultiplemyelomausingbioinformaticsanalysis