Cargando…

MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics

This Minireview compares two distinct ink types, namely metal‐organic decomposition (MOD) and nanoparticle (NP) formulations, for use in the printing of some of the most conductive elements: silver, copper and aluminium. Printing of highly conductive features has found purpose across a broad array o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douglas, Samuel P., Mrig, Shreya, Knapp, Caroline E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004860
_version_ 1783716612283564032
author Douglas, Samuel P.
Mrig, Shreya
Knapp, Caroline E.
author_facet Douglas, Samuel P.
Mrig, Shreya
Knapp, Caroline E.
author_sort Douglas, Samuel P.
collection PubMed
description This Minireview compares two distinct ink types, namely metal‐organic decomposition (MOD) and nanoparticle (NP) formulations, for use in the printing of some of the most conductive elements: silver, copper and aluminium. Printing of highly conductive features has found purpose across a broad array of electronics and as processing times and temperatures reduce, the avenues of application expand to low‐cost flexible substrates, materials for wearable devices and beyond. Printing techniques such as screen, aerosol jet and inkjet printing are scalable, solution‐based processes that historically have employed NP formulations to achieve low resistivity coatings printed at high resolution. Since the turn of the century, the rise in MOD inks has vastly extended the range of potentially applicable compounds that can be printed, whilst simultaneously addressing shelf life and sintering issues. A brief introduction to the field and requirements of an ink will be presented followed by a detailed discussion of a wide array of synthetic routes to both MOD and NP inks. Unindustrialized materials will be discussed, with the challenges and outlook considered for the market leaders: silver and copper, in comparison with the emerging field of aluminium inks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82479162021-07-02 MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics Douglas, Samuel P. Mrig, Shreya Knapp, Caroline E. Chemistry Minireviews This Minireview compares two distinct ink types, namely metal‐organic decomposition (MOD) and nanoparticle (NP) formulations, for use in the printing of some of the most conductive elements: silver, copper and aluminium. Printing of highly conductive features has found purpose across a broad array of electronics and as processing times and temperatures reduce, the avenues of application expand to low‐cost flexible substrates, materials for wearable devices and beyond. Printing techniques such as screen, aerosol jet and inkjet printing are scalable, solution‐based processes that historically have employed NP formulations to achieve low resistivity coatings printed at high resolution. Since the turn of the century, the rise in MOD inks has vastly extended the range of potentially applicable compounds that can be printed, whilst simultaneously addressing shelf life and sintering issues. A brief introduction to the field and requirements of an ink will be presented followed by a detailed discussion of a wide array of synthetic routes to both MOD and NP inks. Unindustrialized materials will be discussed, with the challenges and outlook considered for the market leaders: silver and copper, in comparison with the emerging field of aluminium inks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-01 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8247916/ /pubmed/33464657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004860 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Minireviews
Douglas, Samuel P.
Mrig, Shreya
Knapp, Caroline E.
MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
title MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
title_full MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
title_fullStr MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
title_full_unstemmed MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
title_short MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
title_sort mods vs. nps: vying for the future of printed electronics
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004860
work_keys_str_mv AT douglassamuelp modsvsnpsvyingforthefutureofprintedelectronics
AT mrigshreya modsvsnpsvyingforthefutureofprintedelectronics
AT knappcarolinee modsvsnpsvyingforthefutureofprintedelectronics