Cargando…
MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics
This Minireview compares two distinct ink types, namely metal‐organic decomposition (MOD) and nanoparticle (NP) formulations, for use in the printing of some of the most conductive elements: silver, copper and aluminium. Printing of highly conductive features has found purpose across a broad array o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004860 |
_version_ | 1783716612283564032 |
---|---|
author | Douglas, Samuel P. Mrig, Shreya Knapp, Caroline E. |
author_facet | Douglas, Samuel P. Mrig, Shreya Knapp, Caroline E. |
author_sort | Douglas, Samuel P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This Minireview compares two distinct ink types, namely metal‐organic decomposition (MOD) and nanoparticle (NP) formulations, for use in the printing of some of the most conductive elements: silver, copper and aluminium. Printing of highly conductive features has found purpose across a broad array of electronics and as processing times and temperatures reduce, the avenues of application expand to low‐cost flexible substrates, materials for wearable devices and beyond. Printing techniques such as screen, aerosol jet and inkjet printing are scalable, solution‐based processes that historically have employed NP formulations to achieve low resistivity coatings printed at high resolution. Since the turn of the century, the rise in MOD inks has vastly extended the range of potentially applicable compounds that can be printed, whilst simultaneously addressing shelf life and sintering issues. A brief introduction to the field and requirements of an ink will be presented followed by a detailed discussion of a wide array of synthetic routes to both MOD and NP inks. Unindustrialized materials will be discussed, with the challenges and outlook considered for the market leaders: silver and copper, in comparison with the emerging field of aluminium inks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8247916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82479162021-07-02 MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics Douglas, Samuel P. Mrig, Shreya Knapp, Caroline E. Chemistry Minireviews This Minireview compares two distinct ink types, namely metal‐organic decomposition (MOD) and nanoparticle (NP) formulations, for use in the printing of some of the most conductive elements: silver, copper and aluminium. Printing of highly conductive features has found purpose across a broad array of electronics and as processing times and temperatures reduce, the avenues of application expand to low‐cost flexible substrates, materials for wearable devices and beyond. Printing techniques such as screen, aerosol jet and inkjet printing are scalable, solution‐based processes that historically have employed NP formulations to achieve low resistivity coatings printed at high resolution. Since the turn of the century, the rise in MOD inks has vastly extended the range of potentially applicable compounds that can be printed, whilst simultaneously addressing shelf life and sintering issues. A brief introduction to the field and requirements of an ink will be presented followed by a detailed discussion of a wide array of synthetic routes to both MOD and NP inks. Unindustrialized materials will be discussed, with the challenges and outlook considered for the market leaders: silver and copper, in comparison with the emerging field of aluminium inks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-01 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8247916/ /pubmed/33464657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004860 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Douglas, Samuel P. Mrig, Shreya Knapp, Caroline E. MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics |
title | MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics |
title_full | MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics |
title_fullStr | MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics |
title_full_unstemmed | MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics |
title_short | MODs vs. NPs: Vying for the Future of Printed Electronics |
title_sort | mods vs. nps: vying for the future of printed electronics |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglassamuelp modsvsnpsvyingforthefutureofprintedelectronics AT mrigshreya modsvsnpsvyingforthefutureofprintedelectronics AT knappcarolinee modsvsnpsvyingforthefutureofprintedelectronics |