Cargando…

Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Implant‐supported overdentures represent a successful treatment for edentulous patients. As early diagnosis, detection and supportive care are considered key factors for the prevention of peri‐implant diseases, consistent maintenance of these implants is becoming increasingly relevant. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Moolen, Pieter Leo, Post, Ben Jeroen, Slot, Dagmar Else, van der Weijden, Fridus August
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12963
_version_ 1783716621305511936
author van der Moolen, Pieter Leo
Post, Ben Jeroen
Slot, Dagmar Else
van der Weijden, Fridus August
author_facet van der Moolen, Pieter Leo
Post, Ben Jeroen
Slot, Dagmar Else
van der Weijden, Fridus August
author_sort van der Moolen, Pieter Leo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implant‐supported overdentures represent a successful treatment for edentulous patients. As early diagnosis, detection and supportive care are considered key factors for the prevention of peri‐implant diseases, consistent maintenance of these implants is becoming increasingly relevant. PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis evaluated a cohort of edentulous patients with a mandibular implant‐supported overdenture over a period of 3.5 years during which the peri‐implant tissues were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 patients that had consistently adhered to the annual maintenance appointments was selected. The clinical peri‐implant pocket probing depth (PiPPD) and peri‐implant bleeding on probing score (PiBOP) were investigated. Data from the 3.5‐year follow‐up were compared to data from the baseline assessment. RESULTS: A 100% implant survival was reported after 3.5 years. The mean PiBOP showed a significant decrease over time (P = .028). The mean PiPPD was found significantly deeper for male patients both at baseline (P = .004) and 3.5‐year follow‐up (P < .001). Besides, the PiPPD for locator anchorages was found significantly deeper compared to ball anchorages at the 3.5‐year follow‐up (P = .026). CONCLUSION: In those patients that adhered to the annual maintenance visits during the 3.5 years after implant surgery a stable peri‐implant condition was observed. As future consideration, the comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients participating in the maintenance program with those that did not would make this observation even more meaningful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8247953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82479532021-07-02 Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis van der Moolen, Pieter Leo Post, Ben Jeroen Slot, Dagmar Else van der Weijden, Fridus August Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Implant‐supported overdentures represent a successful treatment for edentulous patients. As early diagnosis, detection and supportive care are considered key factors for the prevention of peri‐implant diseases, consistent maintenance of these implants is becoming increasingly relevant. PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis evaluated a cohort of edentulous patients with a mandibular implant‐supported overdenture over a period of 3.5 years during which the peri‐implant tissues were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 patients that had consistently adhered to the annual maintenance appointments was selected. The clinical peri‐implant pocket probing depth (PiPPD) and peri‐implant bleeding on probing score (PiBOP) were investigated. Data from the 3.5‐year follow‐up were compared to data from the baseline assessment. RESULTS: A 100% implant survival was reported after 3.5 years. The mean PiBOP showed a significant decrease over time (P = .028). The mean PiPPD was found significantly deeper for male patients both at baseline (P = .004) and 3.5‐year follow‐up (P < .001). Besides, the PiPPD for locator anchorages was found significantly deeper compared to ball anchorages at the 3.5‐year follow‐up (P = .026). CONCLUSION: In those patients that adhered to the annual maintenance visits during the 3.5 years after implant surgery a stable peri‐implant condition was observed. As future consideration, the comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients participating in the maintenance program with those that did not would make this observation even more meaningful. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-01-18 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8247953/ /pubmed/33463040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12963 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van der Moolen, Pieter Leo
Post, Ben Jeroen
Slot, Dagmar Else
van der Weijden, Fridus August
Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
title Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
title_full Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
title_short Outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—A 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
title_sort outcome of peri‐implant maintenance care in patients with an implant‐supported lower denture—a 3.5‐year retrospective analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12963
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermoolenpieterleo outcomeofperiimplantmaintenancecareinpatientswithanimplantsupportedlowerdenturea35yearretrospectiveanalysis
AT postbenjeroen outcomeofperiimplantmaintenancecareinpatientswithanimplantsupportedlowerdenturea35yearretrospectiveanalysis
AT slotdagmarelse outcomeofperiimplantmaintenancecareinpatientswithanimplantsupportedlowerdenturea35yearretrospectiveanalysis
AT vanderweijdenfridusaugust outcomeofperiimplantmaintenancecareinpatientswithanimplantsupportedlowerdenturea35yearretrospectiveanalysis