Cargando…

A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Common sinonasal disorders include chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and a deviated nasal septum (DNS), which often coexist with shared common symptoms including nasal obstruction, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea. Various objective outcome measures and patient‐r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ta, Ngan Hong, Gao, Jack, Philpott, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22744
_version_ 1783716640609796096
author Ta, Ngan Hong
Gao, Jack
Philpott, Carl
author_facet Ta, Ngan Hong
Gao, Jack
Philpott, Carl
author_sort Ta, Ngan Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Common sinonasal disorders include chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and a deviated nasal septum (DNS), which often coexist with shared common symptoms including nasal obstruction, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea. Various objective outcome measures and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to assess disease severity; however, there is limited evidence in the literature on the correlation between them. This systematic review aims to examine the relationship between them and provide recommendations. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified studies quantifying correlations between objective outcome measures and PROMs for the sinonasal conditions using a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: In total, 59 studies met inclusion criteria. For nasal obstruction, rhinomanometry shows a lack of correlation whereas peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) shows the strongest correlation with PROMs (r > 0.5). The Sniffin’ Stick test shows a stronger correlation with PROMs (r > 0.5) than the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) (r < 0.5). Computed tomography (CT) sinus scores show little evidence of correlation with PROMs and nasal endoscopic ratings (weak correlation, r < 0.5). CONCLUSION: Overall, objective outcome measures and PROMs assessing sinonasal symptoms are poorly correlated, and we recommend that objective outcome measures be used with validated PROMs depending on the setting. PNIF should be used in routine clinical practice for nasal obstruction; rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry may be useful in research. The Sniffin’ Sticks test is recommended for olfactory dysfunction with UPSIT as an alternative. CT scores should be excluded as a routine CRS outcome measure, and endoscopic scores should be used in combination with PROMs until further research is conducted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82480362021-07-02 A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice Ta, Ngan Hong Gao, Jack Philpott, Carl Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Review Articles BACKGROUND: Common sinonasal disorders include chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and a deviated nasal septum (DNS), which often coexist with shared common symptoms including nasal obstruction, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea. Various objective outcome measures and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to assess disease severity; however, there is limited evidence in the literature on the correlation between them. This systematic review aims to examine the relationship between them and provide recommendations. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified studies quantifying correlations between objective outcome measures and PROMs for the sinonasal conditions using a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: In total, 59 studies met inclusion criteria. For nasal obstruction, rhinomanometry shows a lack of correlation whereas peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) shows the strongest correlation with PROMs (r > 0.5). The Sniffin’ Stick test shows a stronger correlation with PROMs (r > 0.5) than the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) (r < 0.5). Computed tomography (CT) sinus scores show little evidence of correlation with PROMs and nasal endoscopic ratings (weak correlation, r < 0.5). CONCLUSION: Overall, objective outcome measures and PROMs assessing sinonasal symptoms are poorly correlated, and we recommend that objective outcome measures be used with validated PROMs depending on the setting. PNIF should be used in routine clinical practice for nasal obstruction; rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry may be useful in research. The Sniffin’ Sticks test is recommended for olfactory dysfunction with UPSIT as an alternative. CT scores should be excluded as a routine CRS outcome measure, and endoscopic scores should be used in combination with PROMs until further research is conducted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-08 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8248036/ /pubmed/33417297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22744 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Ta, Ngan Hong
Gao, Jack
Philpott, Carl
A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
title A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
title_full A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
title_fullStr A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
title_short A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
title_sort systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient‐reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22744
work_keys_str_mv AT tanganhong asystematicreviewtoexaminetherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinsinonasaldisordersrecommendationsforuseinresearchandclinicalpractice
AT gaojack asystematicreviewtoexaminetherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinsinonasaldisordersrecommendationsforuseinresearchandclinicalpractice
AT philpottcarl asystematicreviewtoexaminetherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinsinonasaldisordersrecommendationsforuseinresearchandclinicalpractice
AT tanganhong systematicreviewtoexaminetherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinsinonasaldisordersrecommendationsforuseinresearchandclinicalpractice
AT gaojack systematicreviewtoexaminetherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinsinonasaldisordersrecommendationsforuseinresearchandclinicalpractice
AT philpottcarl systematicreviewtoexaminetherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinsinonasaldisordersrecommendationsforuseinresearchandclinicalpractice