Cargando…

Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Early detection of skin cancer is still a major challenge in dermatology practice today. While surveillance programs are offered to high‐risk patients, systematic total‐body examination (TBE) in the general population is not cost‐effective. In the past, we demonstrated that a lesion‐dire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mylle, S., Verhaeghe, E., Van Coile, L., Van de Maele, B., Hoorens, I., Brochez, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17129
_version_ 1783716642242428928
author Mylle, S.
Verhaeghe, E.
Van Coile, L.
Van de Maele, B.
Hoorens, I.
Brochez, L.
author_facet Mylle, S.
Verhaeghe, E.
Van Coile, L.
Van de Maele, B.
Hoorens, I.
Brochez, L.
author_sort Mylle, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early detection of skin cancer is still a major challenge in dermatology practice today. While surveillance programs are offered to high‐risk patients, systematic total‐body examination (TBE) in the general population is not cost‐effective. In the past, we demonstrated that a lesion‐directed screening (LDS) in the general population delivered similar detection rates to TBE and was less time‐consuming. OBJECTIVES: To study whether a lesion‐directed early‐access consultation can optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice. METHODS: In this observational study, we offered an early‐access consultation in patients contacting the dermatology department concerning 1 or 2 lesions of concern meeting predefined criteria. RESULTS: 342 persons were seen at the dermatology department after triage by phone. Skin cancer detection rate was 13.2% (4.1% for melanoma). If advised/referred by a doctor skin cancer detection rate was 23.6% (9% for melanoma). With a history of skin cancer, detection rate was 24.3% (4.3% for melanoma). In patients with no referral and a negative history of skin cancer, detection rate was 7.7% (1.7% for melanoma), which is at least triple the rates reported by population‐based screening programs. In patients in whom the index lesion was benign, worry of having skin cancer had decreased significantly by the end of the consultation. Additional total‐body examination in these patients had low additional detection rate (0.5%) and a high number of unnecessary excisions (number needed to excise 13). CONCLUSIONS: An early‐access dermatology consultation for LDS after triage by phone resulted in high overall skin cancer and melanoma detection rates. Our data indicate that performing TBE is especially useful if the index lesion is suspicious. In addition to surveillance programs in high‐risk patients, LDS may be a way to optimize skin cancer detection in the general population and use available time more efficiently in daily dermatology practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82480462021-07-02 Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study Mylle, S. Verhaeghe, E. Van Coile, L. Van de Maele, B. Hoorens, I. Brochez, L. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology BACKGROUND: Early detection of skin cancer is still a major challenge in dermatology practice today. While surveillance programs are offered to high‐risk patients, systematic total‐body examination (TBE) in the general population is not cost‐effective. In the past, we demonstrated that a lesion‐directed screening (LDS) in the general population delivered similar detection rates to TBE and was less time‐consuming. OBJECTIVES: To study whether a lesion‐directed early‐access consultation can optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice. METHODS: In this observational study, we offered an early‐access consultation in patients contacting the dermatology department concerning 1 or 2 lesions of concern meeting predefined criteria. RESULTS: 342 persons were seen at the dermatology department after triage by phone. Skin cancer detection rate was 13.2% (4.1% for melanoma). If advised/referred by a doctor skin cancer detection rate was 23.6% (9% for melanoma). With a history of skin cancer, detection rate was 24.3% (4.3% for melanoma). In patients with no referral and a negative history of skin cancer, detection rate was 7.7% (1.7% for melanoma), which is at least triple the rates reported by population‐based screening programs. In patients in whom the index lesion was benign, worry of having skin cancer had decreased significantly by the end of the consultation. Additional total‐body examination in these patients had low additional detection rate (0.5%) and a high number of unnecessary excisions (number needed to excise 13). CONCLUSIONS: An early‐access dermatology consultation for LDS after triage by phone resulted in high overall skin cancer and melanoma detection rates. Our data indicate that performing TBE is especially useful if the index lesion is suspicious. In addition to surveillance programs in high‐risk patients, LDS may be a way to optimize skin cancer detection in the general population and use available time more efficiently in daily dermatology practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-12 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8248046/ /pubmed/33480073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17129 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology
Mylle, S.
Verhaeghe, E.
Van Coile, L.
Van de Maele, B.
Hoorens, I.
Brochez, L.
Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
title Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
title_full Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
title_fullStr Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
title_short Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
title_sort lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study
topic Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17129
work_keys_str_mv AT mylles lesiondirectedscreeningtooptimizeskincancerdetectionindermatologypracticeanobservationalstudy
AT verhaeghee lesiondirectedscreeningtooptimizeskincancerdetectionindermatologypracticeanobservationalstudy
AT vancoilel lesiondirectedscreeningtooptimizeskincancerdetectionindermatologypracticeanobservationalstudy
AT vandemaeleb lesiondirectedscreeningtooptimizeskincancerdetectionindermatologypracticeanobservationalstudy
AT hoorensi lesiondirectedscreeningtooptimizeskincancerdetectionindermatologypracticeanobservationalstudy
AT brochezl lesiondirectedscreeningtooptimizeskincancerdetectionindermatologypracticeanobservationalstudy