Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study
INTRODUCTION: The EMBRACE study (Clinical Trials No. NCT02462759) evaluated nusinersen in infants/children with infantile‐ or later‐onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) who were ineligible for the ENDEAR and CHERISH studies. METHODS: Participants were randomized to intrathecal nusinersen (12‐mg scale...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.27187 |
_version_ | 1783716645733138432 |
---|---|
author | Acsadi, Gyula Crawford, Thomas O. Müller‐Felber, Wolfgang Shieh, Perry B. Richardson, Randal Natarajan, Niranjana Castro, Diana Ramirez‐Schrempp, Daniela Gambino, Giulia Sun, Peng Farwell, Wildon |
author_facet | Acsadi, Gyula Crawford, Thomas O. Müller‐Felber, Wolfgang Shieh, Perry B. Richardson, Randal Natarajan, Niranjana Castro, Diana Ramirez‐Schrempp, Daniela Gambino, Giulia Sun, Peng Farwell, Wildon |
author_sort | Acsadi, Gyula |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The EMBRACE study (Clinical Trials No. NCT02462759) evaluated nusinersen in infants/children with infantile‐ or later‐onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) who were ineligible for the ENDEAR and CHERISH studies. METHODS: Participants were randomized to intrathecal nusinersen (12‐mg scaled equivalent dose; n = 14) or sham procedure (n = 7) in part 1 (~14 months) and subsequently received open‐label nusinersen for ~24 months in part 2 of the study. RESULTS: Part 1 was stopped early after the demonstration of motor function benefit with nusinersen in ENDEAR. There were no nusinersen‐related adverse events (AEs) and no study discontinuations due to nusinersen‐related AEs. The most common AEs included pyrexia, cough, pneumonia, and upper respiratory tract infections. Motor milestone responder rates were higher in those receiving nusinersen at last available assessment (93%) than in those receiving sham procedure in part 1 (29%) or transitioned from sham to nusinersen in part 2 (83%). This functional improvement was observed despite the small sample size and shortened part 1 trial duration that undermined the power of the study to demonstrate such treatment effects at a significant level. DISCUSSION: Nusinersen demonstrated a favorable long‐term benefit‐risk profile in this broad population of individuals with infantile‐ or later‐onset SMA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8248061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82480612021-07-02 Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study Acsadi, Gyula Crawford, Thomas O. Müller‐Felber, Wolfgang Shieh, Perry B. Richardson, Randal Natarajan, Niranjana Castro, Diana Ramirez‐Schrempp, Daniela Gambino, Giulia Sun, Peng Farwell, Wildon Muscle Nerve Clinical Research Articles INTRODUCTION: The EMBRACE study (Clinical Trials No. NCT02462759) evaluated nusinersen in infants/children with infantile‐ or later‐onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) who were ineligible for the ENDEAR and CHERISH studies. METHODS: Participants were randomized to intrathecal nusinersen (12‐mg scaled equivalent dose; n = 14) or sham procedure (n = 7) in part 1 (~14 months) and subsequently received open‐label nusinersen for ~24 months in part 2 of the study. RESULTS: Part 1 was stopped early after the demonstration of motor function benefit with nusinersen in ENDEAR. There were no nusinersen‐related adverse events (AEs) and no study discontinuations due to nusinersen‐related AEs. The most common AEs included pyrexia, cough, pneumonia, and upper respiratory tract infections. Motor milestone responder rates were higher in those receiving nusinersen at last available assessment (93%) than in those receiving sham procedure in part 1 (29%) or transitioned from sham to nusinersen in part 2 (83%). This functional improvement was observed despite the small sample size and shortened part 1 trial duration that undermined the power of the study to demonstrate such treatment effects at a significant level. DISCUSSION: Nusinersen demonstrated a favorable long‐term benefit‐risk profile in this broad population of individuals with infantile‐ or later‐onset SMA. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-02-16 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8248061/ /pubmed/33501671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.27187 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Articles Acsadi, Gyula Crawford, Thomas O. Müller‐Felber, Wolfgang Shieh, Perry B. Richardson, Randal Natarajan, Niranjana Castro, Diana Ramirez‐Schrempp, Daniela Gambino, Giulia Sun, Peng Farwell, Wildon Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study |
title | Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: The EMBRACE study |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy: the embrace study |
topic | Clinical Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.27187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acsadigyula safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT crawfordthomaso safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT mullerfelberwolfgang safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT shiehperryb safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT richardsonrandal safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT natarajanniranjana safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT castrodiana safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT ramirezschremppdaniela safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT gambinogiulia safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT sunpeng safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy AT farwellwildon safetyandefficacyofnusinerseninspinalmuscularatrophytheembracestudy |