Cargando…

A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management

OBJECTIVE: The patient dose monitoring systems DoseWatch and DoseWise were compared to evaluate their reported patient Peak Skin Dose. METHODS: 20 patients with the highest Peak Skin Dose on DoseWise were obtained; the values were converted to a Reference Point Air Kerma (RPAK) value and used for co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coates, Alisha, Rogers, Andy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200924
_version_ 1783716678000967680
author Coates, Alisha
Rogers, Andy
author_facet Coates, Alisha
Rogers, Andy
author_sort Coates, Alisha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The patient dose monitoring systems DoseWatch and DoseWise were compared to evaluate their reported patient Peak Skin Dose. METHODS: 20 patients with the highest Peak Skin Dose on DoseWise were obtained; the values were converted to a Reference Point Air Kerma (RPAK) value and used for comparison. These patients were accessed in DoseWatch to obtain the recorded Worst Case RPAK. The co-ordinates for the position were obtained for each patient to find a primary and secondary angular position for the peak skin dose. The two positions produced by the two softwares were compared. RESULTS: There is a mean deviation of over 0.5 Gy between the two software packages when comparing the calculated maximum skin air kerma Peak skin dose from DoseWise and the Worst Case RPAK from DoseWatch. CONCLUSION: We have shown mean deviations between these two systems. This difference is enough, for higher peak skin absorbed dose patients, to change the management of patients, so local services must understand their models to properly implement patient management. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Neither system is incorrect, but these differences show that a deeper understanding of the analysis limitations is required to properly inform post-procedural high-skin dose follow-up procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82482022021-10-18 A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management Coates, Alisha Rogers, Andy Br J Radiol Short Communication OBJECTIVE: The patient dose monitoring systems DoseWatch and DoseWise were compared to evaluate their reported patient Peak Skin Dose. METHODS: 20 patients with the highest Peak Skin Dose on DoseWise were obtained; the values were converted to a Reference Point Air Kerma (RPAK) value and used for comparison. These patients were accessed in DoseWatch to obtain the recorded Worst Case RPAK. The co-ordinates for the position were obtained for each patient to find a primary and secondary angular position for the peak skin dose. The two positions produced by the two softwares were compared. RESULTS: There is a mean deviation of over 0.5 Gy between the two software packages when comparing the calculated maximum skin air kerma Peak skin dose from DoseWise and the Worst Case RPAK from DoseWatch. CONCLUSION: We have shown mean deviations between these two systems. This difference is enough, for higher peak skin absorbed dose patients, to change the management of patients, so local services must understand their models to properly implement patient management. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Neither system is incorrect, but these differences show that a deeper understanding of the analysis limitations is required to properly inform post-procedural high-skin dose follow-up procedures. The British Institute of Radiology. 2021-07-01 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8248202/ /pubmed/33983040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200924 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Coates, Alisha
Rogers, Andy
A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
title A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
title_full A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
title_fullStr A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
title_short A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
title_sort comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200924
work_keys_str_mv AT coatesalisha acomparisonoftwopeakskindosemetricscalculatedbypatientdosemanagementsystemsimplicationsforclinicalmanagement
AT rogersandy acomparisonoftwopeakskindosemetricscalculatedbypatientdosemanagementsystemsimplicationsforclinicalmanagement
AT coatesalisha comparisonoftwopeakskindosemetricscalculatedbypatientdosemanagementsystemsimplicationsforclinicalmanagement
AT rogersandy comparisonoftwopeakskindosemetricscalculatedbypatientdosemanagementsystemsimplicationsforclinicalmanagement