Cargando…

Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length

A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon in chemistry is the contraction of both C−H and C−C bonds as the carbon atoms involved vary, in s–p hybridization, along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. Our quantum chemical bonding analyses based on Kohn–Sham molecular orbital theory show that the generally accepted ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vermeeren, Pascal, van Zeist, Willem‐Jan, Hamlin, Trevor A., Fonseca Guerra, Célia, Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33513281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004653
_version_ 1783716696744263680
author Vermeeren, Pascal
van Zeist, Willem‐Jan
Hamlin, Trevor A.
Fonseca Guerra, Célia
Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
author_facet Vermeeren, Pascal
van Zeist, Willem‐Jan
Hamlin, Trevor A.
Fonseca Guerra, Célia
Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
author_sort Vermeeren, Pascal
collection PubMed
description A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon in chemistry is the contraction of both C−H and C−C bonds as the carbon atoms involved vary, in s–p hybridization, along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. Our quantum chemical bonding analyses based on Kohn–Sham molecular orbital theory show that the generally accepted rationale behind this trend is incorrect. Inspection of the molecular orbitals and their corresponding orbital overlaps reveals that the above‐mentioned shortening in C−H and C−C bonds is not determined by an increasing amount of s‐character at the carbon atom in these bonds. Instead, we establish that this structural trend is caused by a diminishing steric (Pauli) repulsion between substituents around the pertinent carbon atom, as the coordination number decreases along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82483182021-07-06 Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length Vermeeren, Pascal van Zeist, Willem‐Jan Hamlin, Trevor A. Fonseca Guerra, Célia Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Chemistry Communications A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon in chemistry is the contraction of both C−H and C−C bonds as the carbon atoms involved vary, in s–p hybridization, along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. Our quantum chemical bonding analyses based on Kohn–Sham molecular orbital theory show that the generally accepted rationale behind this trend is incorrect. Inspection of the molecular orbitals and their corresponding orbital overlaps reveals that the above‐mentioned shortening in C−H and C−C bonds is not determined by an increasing amount of s‐character at the carbon atom in these bonds. Instead, we establish that this structural trend is caused by a diminishing steric (Pauli) repulsion between substituents around the pertinent carbon atom, as the coordination number decreases along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-03 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8248318/ /pubmed/33513281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004653 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Communications
Vermeeren, Pascal
van Zeist, Willem‐Jan
Hamlin, Trevor A.
Fonseca Guerra, Célia
Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
title Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
title_full Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
title_fullStr Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
title_full_unstemmed Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
title_short Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
title_sort not carbon s–p hybridization, but coordination number determines c−h and c−c bond length
topic Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33513281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004653
work_keys_str_mv AT vermeerenpascal notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength
AT vanzeistwillemjan notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength
AT hamlintrevora notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength
AT fonsecaguerracelia notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength
AT bickelhauptfmatthias notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength