Cargando…
Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length
A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon in chemistry is the contraction of both C−H and C−C bonds as the carbon atoms involved vary, in s–p hybridization, along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. Our quantum chemical bonding analyses based on Kohn–Sham molecular orbital theory show that the generally accepted ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33513281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004653 |
_version_ | 1783716696744263680 |
---|---|
author | Vermeeren, Pascal van Zeist, Willem‐Jan Hamlin, Trevor A. Fonseca Guerra, Célia Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias |
author_facet | Vermeeren, Pascal van Zeist, Willem‐Jan Hamlin, Trevor A. Fonseca Guerra, Célia Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias |
author_sort | Vermeeren, Pascal |
collection | PubMed |
description | A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon in chemistry is the contraction of both C−H and C−C bonds as the carbon atoms involved vary, in s–p hybridization, along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. Our quantum chemical bonding analyses based on Kohn–Sham molecular orbital theory show that the generally accepted rationale behind this trend is incorrect. Inspection of the molecular orbitals and their corresponding orbital overlaps reveals that the above‐mentioned shortening in C−H and C−C bonds is not determined by an increasing amount of s‐character at the carbon atom in these bonds. Instead, we establish that this structural trend is caused by a diminishing steric (Pauli) repulsion between substituents around the pertinent carbon atom, as the coordination number decreases along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8248318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82483182021-07-06 Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length Vermeeren, Pascal van Zeist, Willem‐Jan Hamlin, Trevor A. Fonseca Guerra, Célia Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Chemistry Communications A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon in chemistry is the contraction of both C−H and C−C bonds as the carbon atoms involved vary, in s–p hybridization, along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. Our quantum chemical bonding analyses based on Kohn–Sham molecular orbital theory show that the generally accepted rationale behind this trend is incorrect. Inspection of the molecular orbitals and their corresponding orbital overlaps reveals that the above‐mentioned shortening in C−H and C−C bonds is not determined by an increasing amount of s‐character at the carbon atom in these bonds. Instead, we establish that this structural trend is caused by a diminishing steric (Pauli) repulsion between substituents around the pertinent carbon atom, as the coordination number decreases along sp(3) to sp(2) to sp. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-03 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8248318/ /pubmed/33513281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004653 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Communications Vermeeren, Pascal van Zeist, Willem‐Jan Hamlin, Trevor A. Fonseca Guerra, Célia Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length |
title | Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length |
title_full | Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length |
title_fullStr | Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length |
title_full_unstemmed | Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length |
title_short | Not Carbon s–p Hybridization, but Coordination Number Determines C−H and C−C Bond Length |
title_sort | not carbon s–p hybridization, but coordination number determines c−h and c−c bond length |
topic | Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33513281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermeerenpascal notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength AT vanzeistwillemjan notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength AT hamlintrevora notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength AT fonsecaguerracelia notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength AT bickelhauptfmatthias notcarbonsphybridizationbutcoordinationnumberdetermineschandccbondlength |