Cargando…
A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
There is a growing application of integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) for manufacturing recombinant protein therapeutics produced from mammalian cells. At first glance, the newly evolved ICB has created a vast diversity of platforms. A closer inspection reveals convergent evolution: nearly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27690 |
_version_ | 1783716715237998592 |
---|---|
author | Coffman, Jonathan Brower, Mark Connell‐Crowley, Lisa Deldari, Sevda Farid, Suzanne S. Horowski, Brian Patil, Ujwal Pollard, David Qadan, Maen Rose, Steven Schaefer, Eugene Shultz, Joseph |
author_facet | Coffman, Jonathan Brower, Mark Connell‐Crowley, Lisa Deldari, Sevda Farid, Suzanne S. Horowski, Brian Patil, Ujwal Pollard, David Qadan, Maen Rose, Steven Schaefer, Eugene Shultz, Joseph |
author_sort | Coffman, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a growing application of integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) for manufacturing recombinant protein therapeutics produced from mammalian cells. At first glance, the newly evolved ICB has created a vast diversity of platforms. A closer inspection reveals convergent evolution: nearly all of the major ICB methods have a common framework that could allow manufacturing across a global ecosystem of manufacturers using simple, yet effective, equipment designs. The framework is capable of supporting the manufacturing of most major biopharmaceutical ICB and legacy processes without major changes in the regulatory license. This article reviews the ICB that are being used, or are soon to be used, in a GMP manufacturing setting for recombinant protein production from mammalian cells. The adaptation of the various ICB modes to the common ICB framework will be discussed, along with the pros and cons of such adaptation. The equipment used in the common framework is generally described. This review is presented in sufficient detail to enable discussions of IBC implementation strategy in biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturers, and to provide a road map for vendors equipment design. An example plant built on the common framework will be discussed. The flexibility of the plant is demonstrated with batches as small as 0.5 kg or as large as 500 kg. The yearly output of the plant is as much as 8 tons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8248397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82483972021-07-06 A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing Coffman, Jonathan Brower, Mark Connell‐Crowley, Lisa Deldari, Sevda Farid, Suzanne S. Horowski, Brian Patil, Ujwal Pollard, David Qadan, Maen Rose, Steven Schaefer, Eugene Shultz, Joseph Biotechnol Bioeng REVIEW There is a growing application of integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) for manufacturing recombinant protein therapeutics produced from mammalian cells. At first glance, the newly evolved ICB has created a vast diversity of platforms. A closer inspection reveals convergent evolution: nearly all of the major ICB methods have a common framework that could allow manufacturing across a global ecosystem of manufacturers using simple, yet effective, equipment designs. The framework is capable of supporting the manufacturing of most major biopharmaceutical ICB and legacy processes without major changes in the regulatory license. This article reviews the ICB that are being used, or are soon to be used, in a GMP manufacturing setting for recombinant protein production from mammalian cells. The adaptation of the various ICB modes to the common ICB framework will be discussed, along with the pros and cons of such adaptation. The equipment used in the common framework is generally described. This review is presented in sufficient detail to enable discussions of IBC implementation strategy in biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturers, and to provide a road map for vendors equipment design. An example plant built on the common framework will be discussed. The flexibility of the plant is demonstrated with batches as small as 0.5 kg or as large as 500 kg. The yearly output of the plant is as much as 8 tons. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-01 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8248397/ /pubmed/33491769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27690 Text en © 2021 AstraZeneca. Biotechnology and Bioengineering published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | REVIEW Coffman, Jonathan Brower, Mark Connell‐Crowley, Lisa Deldari, Sevda Farid, Suzanne S. Horowski, Brian Patil, Ujwal Pollard, David Qadan, Maen Rose, Steven Schaefer, Eugene Shultz, Joseph A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
title | A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
title_full | A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
title_fullStr | A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
title_full_unstemmed | A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
title_short | A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
title_sort | common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing |
topic | REVIEW |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coffmanjonathan acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT browermark acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT connellcrowleylisa acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT deldarisevda acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT faridsuzannes acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT horowskibrian acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT patilujwal acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT pollarddavid acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT qadanmaen acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT rosesteven acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT schaefereugene acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT shultzjoseph acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT coffmanjonathan commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT browermark commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT connellcrowleylisa commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT deldarisevda commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT faridsuzannes commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT horowskibrian commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT patilujwal commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT pollarddavid commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT qadanmaen commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT rosesteven commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT schaefereugene commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing AT shultzjoseph commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing |