Cargando…

A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing

There is a growing application of integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) for manufacturing recombinant protein therapeutics produced from mammalian cells. At first glance, the newly evolved ICB has created a vast diversity of platforms. A closer inspection reveals convergent evolution: nearly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coffman, Jonathan, Brower, Mark, Connell‐Crowley, Lisa, Deldari, Sevda, Farid, Suzanne S., Horowski, Brian, Patil, Ujwal, Pollard, David, Qadan, Maen, Rose, Steven, Schaefer, Eugene, Shultz, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27690
_version_ 1783716715237998592
author Coffman, Jonathan
Brower, Mark
Connell‐Crowley, Lisa
Deldari, Sevda
Farid, Suzanne S.
Horowski, Brian
Patil, Ujwal
Pollard, David
Qadan, Maen
Rose, Steven
Schaefer, Eugene
Shultz, Joseph
author_facet Coffman, Jonathan
Brower, Mark
Connell‐Crowley, Lisa
Deldari, Sevda
Farid, Suzanne S.
Horowski, Brian
Patil, Ujwal
Pollard, David
Qadan, Maen
Rose, Steven
Schaefer, Eugene
Shultz, Joseph
author_sort Coffman, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description There is a growing application of integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) for manufacturing recombinant protein therapeutics produced from mammalian cells. At first glance, the newly evolved ICB has created a vast diversity of platforms. A closer inspection reveals convergent evolution: nearly all of the major ICB methods have a common framework that could allow manufacturing across a global ecosystem of manufacturers using simple, yet effective, equipment designs. The framework is capable of supporting the manufacturing of most major biopharmaceutical ICB and legacy processes without major changes in the regulatory license. This article reviews the ICB that are being used, or are soon to be used, in a GMP manufacturing setting for recombinant protein production from mammalian cells. The adaptation of the various ICB modes to the common ICB framework will be discussed, along with the pros and cons of such adaptation. The equipment used in the common framework is generally described. This review is presented in sufficient detail to enable discussions of IBC implementation strategy in biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturers, and to provide a road map for vendors equipment design. An example plant built on the common framework will be discussed. The flexibility of the plant is demonstrated with batches as small as 0.5 kg or as large as 500 kg. The yearly output of the plant is as much as 8 tons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82483972021-07-06 A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing Coffman, Jonathan Brower, Mark Connell‐Crowley, Lisa Deldari, Sevda Farid, Suzanne S. Horowski, Brian Patil, Ujwal Pollard, David Qadan, Maen Rose, Steven Schaefer, Eugene Shultz, Joseph Biotechnol Bioeng REVIEW There is a growing application of integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) for manufacturing recombinant protein therapeutics produced from mammalian cells. At first glance, the newly evolved ICB has created a vast diversity of platforms. A closer inspection reveals convergent evolution: nearly all of the major ICB methods have a common framework that could allow manufacturing across a global ecosystem of manufacturers using simple, yet effective, equipment designs. The framework is capable of supporting the manufacturing of most major biopharmaceutical ICB and legacy processes without major changes in the regulatory license. This article reviews the ICB that are being used, or are soon to be used, in a GMP manufacturing setting for recombinant protein production from mammalian cells. The adaptation of the various ICB modes to the common ICB framework will be discussed, along with the pros and cons of such adaptation. The equipment used in the common framework is generally described. This review is presented in sufficient detail to enable discussions of IBC implementation strategy in biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturers, and to provide a road map for vendors equipment design. An example plant built on the common framework will be discussed. The flexibility of the plant is demonstrated with batches as small as 0.5 kg or as large as 500 kg. The yearly output of the plant is as much as 8 tons. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-01 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8248397/ /pubmed/33491769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27690 Text en © 2021 AstraZeneca. Biotechnology and Bioengineering published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle REVIEW
Coffman, Jonathan
Brower, Mark
Connell‐Crowley, Lisa
Deldari, Sevda
Farid, Suzanne S.
Horowski, Brian
Patil, Ujwal
Pollard, David
Qadan, Maen
Rose, Steven
Schaefer, Eugene
Shultz, Joseph
A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
title A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
title_full A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
title_fullStr A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
title_full_unstemmed A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
title_short A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
title_sort common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing
topic REVIEW
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27690
work_keys_str_mv AT coffmanjonathan acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT browermark acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT connellcrowleylisa acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT deldarisevda acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT faridsuzannes acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT horowskibrian acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT patilujwal acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT pollarddavid acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT qadanmaen acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT rosesteven acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT schaefereugene acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT shultzjoseph acommonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT coffmanjonathan commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT browermark commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT connellcrowleylisa commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT deldarisevda commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT faridsuzannes commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT horowskibrian commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT patilujwal commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT pollarddavid commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT qadanmaen commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT rosesteven commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT schaefereugene commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing
AT shultzjoseph commonframeworkforintegratedandcontinuousbiomanufacturing