Cargando…
Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review
Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare the clinical value of the peak time point and area under the curve (AUC) of miRNAs and conventional biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane systematicall...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.668324 |
_version_ | 1783716743160528896 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Baofu Li, Yang Hao, Xuezeng Yang, Jingjing Han, Xiaowan Li, Haiyan Li, Tong Wang, Dayang Teng, Yu Ma, Liang Li, Yao Zhao, Mingjing Wang, Xian |
author_facet | Wang, Baofu Li, Yang Hao, Xuezeng Yang, Jingjing Han, Xiaowan Li, Haiyan Li, Tong Wang, Dayang Teng, Yu Ma, Liang Li, Yao Zhao, Mingjing Wang, Xian |
author_sort | Wang, Baofu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare the clinical value of the peak time point and area under the curve (AUC) of miRNAs and conventional biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane systematically. Screening studies, extracting data, and assessing article quality were performed independently by two researchers. Also, the names of miRNAs in the included studies were standardized by the miRBase database. Results: A total of 40 studies, encompassing 6,960 participants, were included in this systematic review. The samples of circulating miRNAs were mainly from the plasma. The results of this systematic review displayed that miR-1-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-22-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-133a/b, miR-134-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-186-5p, miR-208a, miR-223-3p, miR-483-5p, and miR-499a-5p reached peak time earlier and showed a shorter time window than the conventional biomarkers despite the different collection times of initial blood samples. miR-1-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-133a/b, miR-208a/b, miR-223-3p, miR-483-5p, and miR-499a-5p were shown to be more valuable than classical biomarkers for the early diagnosis of AMI, and these miRNAs appeared to have the most potential biomarkers within 4 h of the onset of symptoms except miR-133a/b and miR-208b. Moreover, combined miRNAs or miRNAs combined with classical biomarkers could compensate for the deficiency of single miRNA and conventional biomarker in sensitivity or specificity for an optimal clinical value. Conclusions: miR-1-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-208a, miR-223-3p, miR-483-5p, and miR-499a-5p are promising biomarkers for AMI due to their satisfactory diagnostic accuracy and short time window (within 4 h of the onset of symptoms). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8248539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82485392021-07-02 Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review Wang, Baofu Li, Yang Hao, Xuezeng Yang, Jingjing Han, Xiaowan Li, Haiyan Li, Tong Wang, Dayang Teng, Yu Ma, Liang Li, Yao Zhao, Mingjing Wang, Xian Front Genet Genetics Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare the clinical value of the peak time point and area under the curve (AUC) of miRNAs and conventional biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane systematically. Screening studies, extracting data, and assessing article quality were performed independently by two researchers. Also, the names of miRNAs in the included studies were standardized by the miRBase database. Results: A total of 40 studies, encompassing 6,960 participants, were included in this systematic review. The samples of circulating miRNAs were mainly from the plasma. The results of this systematic review displayed that miR-1-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-22-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-133a/b, miR-134-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-186-5p, miR-208a, miR-223-3p, miR-483-5p, and miR-499a-5p reached peak time earlier and showed a shorter time window than the conventional biomarkers despite the different collection times of initial blood samples. miR-1-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-133a/b, miR-208a/b, miR-223-3p, miR-483-5p, and miR-499a-5p were shown to be more valuable than classical biomarkers for the early diagnosis of AMI, and these miRNAs appeared to have the most potential biomarkers within 4 h of the onset of symptoms except miR-133a/b and miR-208b. Moreover, combined miRNAs or miRNAs combined with classical biomarkers could compensate for the deficiency of single miRNA and conventional biomarker in sensitivity or specificity for an optimal clinical value. Conclusions: miR-1-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-208a, miR-223-3p, miR-483-5p, and miR-499a-5p are promising biomarkers for AMI due to their satisfactory diagnostic accuracy and short time window (within 4 h of the onset of symptoms). Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8248539/ /pubmed/34220945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.668324 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Li, Hao, Yang, Han, Li, Li, Wang, Teng, Ma, Li, Zhao and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Wang, Baofu Li, Yang Hao, Xuezeng Yang, Jingjing Han, Xiaowan Li, Haiyan Li, Tong Wang, Dayang Teng, Yu Ma, Liang Li, Yao Zhao, Mingjing Wang, Xian Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review |
title | Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Comparison of the Clinical Value of miRNAs and Conventional Biomarkers in AMI: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | comparison of the clinical value of mirnas and conventional biomarkers in ami: a systematic review |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.668324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbaofu comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT liyang comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT haoxuezeng comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT yangjingjing comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT hanxiaowan comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT lihaiyan comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT litong comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT wangdayang comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT tengyu comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT maliang comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT liyao comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT zhaomingjing comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview AT wangxian comparisonoftheclinicalvalueofmirnasandconventionalbiomarkersinamiasystematicreview |