Cargando…

Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure monitoring is increasingly used for pregnant individuals; however, there are no guidelines on such monitoring in this population. We assessed current practices in the prescription and use of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a systemat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Karen, Padwal, Raj, Khan, Nadia, Wright, Mary-Doug, Chan, Wee Shian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Joule Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131027
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200099
_version_ 1783716748662407168
author Tran, Karen
Padwal, Raj
Khan, Nadia
Wright, Mary-Doug
Chan, Wee Shian
author_facet Tran, Karen
Padwal, Raj
Khan, Nadia
Wright, Mary-Doug
Chan, Wee Shian
author_sort Tran, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure monitoring is increasingly used for pregnant individuals; however, there are no guidelines on such monitoring in this population. We assessed current practices in the prescription and use of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a structured search through the MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974) and CENTRAL (from 2018) databases up to Oct. 19, 2020. We included trials comparing office and home blood pressure monitoring in pregnant people. Outcomes included patient education, home blood pressure device, monitoring schedule, adherence, diagnostic thresholds for home blood pressure, and comparison between home and office measurements of blood pressure. RESULTS: We included in our review 21 articles on 19 individual studies (1 RCT, 18 observational) that assessed home and office blood pressure in pregnant individuals (n = 2843). We observed variation in practice patterns in terms of how home monitoring was prescribed. Eight (42%) of the studies used validated home blood pressure devices. Across all studies, measurements were taken 3 to 36 times per week. Third-trimester home blood pressure corresponding to office blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg after application of a conversion factor ranged from 118 to 143 mm Hg (systolic) and from 76 to 92 mm Hg (diastolic), depending on the patient population and methodology. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values measured at home were lower than office values by 4 (95% confidence interval [CI] −6 to −3) mm Hg and 3 (95% CI −4 to −2) mm Hg, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Many issues related to home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy are currently unresolved, including technique, monitoring schedule and target values. Future studies should prioritize the use of validated home measuring devices and standardized measurement schedules and should establish treatment targets. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020147352
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher CMA Joule Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82485642021-07-02 Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Tran, Karen Padwal, Raj Khan, Nadia Wright, Mary-Doug Chan, Wee Shian CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure monitoring is increasingly used for pregnant individuals; however, there are no guidelines on such monitoring in this population. We assessed current practices in the prescription and use of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a structured search through the MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974) and CENTRAL (from 2018) databases up to Oct. 19, 2020. We included trials comparing office and home blood pressure monitoring in pregnant people. Outcomes included patient education, home blood pressure device, monitoring schedule, adherence, diagnostic thresholds for home blood pressure, and comparison between home and office measurements of blood pressure. RESULTS: We included in our review 21 articles on 19 individual studies (1 RCT, 18 observational) that assessed home and office blood pressure in pregnant individuals (n = 2843). We observed variation in practice patterns in terms of how home monitoring was prescribed. Eight (42%) of the studies used validated home blood pressure devices. Across all studies, measurements were taken 3 to 36 times per week. Third-trimester home blood pressure corresponding to office blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg after application of a conversion factor ranged from 118 to 143 mm Hg (systolic) and from 76 to 92 mm Hg (diastolic), depending on the patient population and methodology. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values measured at home were lower than office values by 4 (95% confidence interval [CI] −6 to −3) mm Hg and 3 (95% CI −4 to −2) mm Hg, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Many issues related to home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy are currently unresolved, including technique, monitoring schedule and target values. Future studies should prioritize the use of validated home measuring devices and standardized measurement schedules and should establish treatment targets. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020147352 CMA Joule Inc. 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8248564/ /pubmed/34131027 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200099 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Tran, Karen
Padwal, Raj
Khan, Nadia
Wright, Mary-Doug
Chan, Wee Shian
Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131027
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200099
work_keys_str_mv AT trankaren homebloodpressuremonitoringinthediagnosisandtreatmentofhypertensioninpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT padwalraj homebloodpressuremonitoringinthediagnosisandtreatmentofhypertensioninpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khannadia homebloodpressuremonitoringinthediagnosisandtreatmentofhypertensioninpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wrightmarydoug homebloodpressuremonitoringinthediagnosisandtreatmentofhypertensioninpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chanweeshian homebloodpressuremonitoringinthediagnosisandtreatmentofhypertensioninpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis